Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/696,524

METHOD FOR THE STABILIZATION OF MARINE CLAYS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — IT 102021000025103 +1 more
Examiner
GREEN, ANTHONY J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Eth Zurich Institute Of Geotechnical Engineering
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1377 granted / 1619 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1644
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1619 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . EXAMINER’S COMMENT Response to Preliminary Amendment The preliminary amendment submitted on 28 March 2024 has been entered. After entry of the amendment claims 1-12 are currently pending in the application. Drawings New corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in this application because according to 37 CFR 1.84(u): Where only a single view is used in an application to illustrate the claimed invention, it must not be numbered and the abbreviation "FIG." must not appear. Applicant is advised to employ the services of a competent patent draftsperson outside the Office, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office no longer prepares new drawings. The corrected drawings are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The requirement for corrected drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The disclosure is objected to because it contains an embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code. Applicant is required to delete the embedded hyperlink and/or other form of browser-executable code; references to websites should be limited to the top-level domain name without any prefix such as http:// or other browser-executable code. See MPEP § 608.01. In the specification, on page 10, lines 10, 17, and 18, the phrase “Figure 1” should be changed to “The figure” because according to 37 CFR 1.84(u): where only a single view is used in an application to illustrate the claimed invention, it must not be numbered Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 6, line 2, the term “amongst” should be changed to – from –. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, part a., the phrase “the mussel shell calcination temperature” lacks proper antecedent basis. In claim 1, part b., the phrase “up to obtaining a powder having an appropriate particles size” is confusing and therefore vague and indefinite. What is meant by “up to obtaining” and what size is an appropriate size? Clarification is requested. In claim 1, part d., the phrases “said marine clays sediments” and “the plasticity index” lack proper antecedent basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY J GREEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1367. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 6:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber R. Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY J GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731 ajg May 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679770
THERMAL INSULATION MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THERMAL INSULATION MATERIAL
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668543
DRY GRINDING OF STEEL MAKING SLAG, GROUND STEEL MAKING SLAG, AND ITS USE IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668536
HYALOCLASTITE, SIDEROMELANE OR TACHYLITE POZZOLAN-BASED GEOPOLYMER CEMENT AND CONCRETE AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668540
Compositions of Steel-microfiber Reinforced Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) using recycled glass powder and processes for making the same
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668658
BINDER COMPOSITION, EPOXY-BASED CURED PRODUCT FORMED THEREFROM, AND LIGHT EMITTING LAYER CONTAINING EPOXY-BASED CURED PRODUCT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.4%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1619 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month