Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/696,656

Camera Module and Electronic Device

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2021 — CN 202111149178.9 +1 more
Examiner
DUNNING, RYAN S
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
329 granted / 433 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
460
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
78.1%
+38.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 433 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 19 recite the phrase: “a second light-exiting surface”. However, this phrase lacks antecedent basis because there is no earlier-recited “first light-exiting surface”. Thus, it is unclear whether this phrase is intended to be the first instance of a claimed “light-exiting surface” or is intended to refer to a different earlier-recited component or feature. For examination, this phrase will be treated as: “light-exiting surface”. Claim 20 inherits the deficiencies of Claim 19. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-18 are allowable. Claims 19 and 20 would be allowable assuming satisfactory resolution of the 35 USC 112(b) issues explained above. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. With respect to Claim 1, although the prior art discloses various camera modules, including: PNG media_image1.png 176 574 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 180 574 media_image2.png Greyscale a stabilization motor comprising: PNG media_image3.png 105 536 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 144 572 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 214 576 media_image5.png Greyscale The prior art does not appear to disclose or suggest the above features further comprising: a focusing lens and a prime lens between the first reflector and the second reflector, the lenses being arranged in the stated order from the object side to the image side With respect to Claim 18, although the prior art discloses various electronic devices, including: PNG media_image6.png 100 572 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 174 576 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 174 574 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 438 576 media_image9.png Greyscale The prior art does not appear to disclose or suggest the above features further comprising: a focusing lens and a prime lens between the first reflector and the second reflector, the lenses being arranged in the stated order from the object side to the image side With respect to Claims 2-17, these claims each depend from Claim 1, and are therefore allowable for at least the reasons stated above. With respect to Claims 19 and 20, these claims each depend from Claim 18, and are therefore allowable for at least the reasons stated above, assuming satisfactory resolution of the 35 USC 112(b) issues explained above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN S DUNNING whose telephone number is 571-272-4879. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday 11:00AM to 4:00PM Eastern Time Zone. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BUMSUK WON can be reached at 571-272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN S DUNNING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681323
LIGHT RAY MODULATION ELEMENT, GLASSES AND 3D DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674915
ELEMENT COMPRISING A TRANSPARENT SUBSTRATE AND A MULTI-LAYER WEAR PROTECTION COATING WITH ADJUSTED REFLECTANCE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669696
NIGHT VISION RECORDING AND DISPLAY MODULE FOR NIGHT VISION MONOCULAR DEVICE AND NIGHT VISION SYSTEM EMPLOYING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663637
FIBER OPTIC LENS CLEANING
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650667
DISPLAY APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND HOLOGRAPHIC 3D DISPLAY SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.4%)
2y 11m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 433 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month