Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/696,680

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LOW-COMPLEXITY QUANTUM DIRECT COMMUNICATION USING TWO-PHOTON INTERFERENCE

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTKR2021013351
Examiner
WOLDEKIDAN, HIBRET ASNAKE
Art Unit
2635
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 852 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
82.8%
+42.8% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claims 16-19 describe “a computer readable storage medium”. Further, Applicant's specification, at paragraphs 106,107,120 fails to explicitly define the scope of “a computer readable storage medium”. Thus, in giving the term its plain meaning (see MPEP 2111.01), the claimed **computer readable medium** is considered to include data signals per se. Data signals per se are not statutory as they fail to fall into one of the four statutory categories of invention. As an additional note, a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable programming instructions stored thereon is considered statutory as non-transitory computer readable media excludes transitory data signals. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1,2,16,17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Han et al.(KR 20180135780 A: Submitted as an IDS). Considering Claim 1 Han discloses a method used by a communication device in a quantum communication system, the method comprising: obtaining configuration information regarding a quantum signal used in quantum communication(See Paragraph 310, fig. 1,3 i.e. the second device(120 of fig. 1) obtaining configuration information(quantum message) regarding a quantum signal used in quantum communication(S310 of fig. 3) ); receiving a first block sequence over a quantum channel, wherein the first block sequence includes a plurality of first single photons related to the quantum signal(See Paragraph 35,52, fig. 1,3 i.e. a second communication device(120) for receiving a first block sequence(quantum signature pair) over a quantum channel, wherein the first block sequence includes a plurality of first single photons related to the quantum signal(S330 of fig. 3)); generating a plurality of second single photons based on the configuration information(See Paragraph 35, fig. 1 i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) (111) of the first communication device(110) for generating a plurality of second single photons based on the configuration information); inputting first and second single photons related to each other into a beam splitter (BS) (See Paragraph 40,57, fig. 1 i.e. inputting first and second single photons related to each other into a beam splitter (BS)(122) of the second communication device(120)); and determining whether there are errors in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS(See Paragraph 38,41,58, fig. 1 i.e. photodetectors(123,124) for determining whether there are errors(verify a quantum signature) in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS). Considering Claim 2 Han discloses 2 the method of claim 1, wherein the first single photons have N-dimensional properties, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2(See Paragraph 46,48, fig. 1 i.e. the first single photons have N-dimensional properties, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2(since the photons are rotated by three dimensional vector by polarization plates(114-1…114-3))). Claim 16 rejected for the same reason as in claim 1. Claim 17 rejected for the same reason as in claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6,7,11,12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lukens et al.(US 2020/0274703) in view of Han et al.(KR 20180135780 A: Submitted as an IDS) Considering Claim 6 Lukens discloses a communication device used in a quantum communication system, the communication device comprising: at least one transceiver(See Paragraph 56, fig. 7 i.e. at least one transceiver(Alice,Bob, Eve)); at least one processor(See Paragraph 56, fig. 7 i.e. at least one processor(712,718,714)); and at least one computer memory operably connected to the at least one processor (See Paragraph 62, fig. 9 i.e. at least one computer memory(924) operably connected to the at least one processor(922) ) and configured to, when executed, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising: obtaining configuration information regarding a quantum signal used in quantum communication(See Paragraph 64, fig. 11i.e. obtaining configuration information(listing to QKD(Quantum Key distribution) request) regarding a quantum signal used in quantum communication(1102)); receiving a first block sequence over a quantum channel(See Paragraph 56,64, fig. 7,11i.e. receiving a first block sequence over a quantum channel(1108 of fig. 11). Further shown in fig. 7, processor(712,714,718) receiving a first block sequence over a quantum channel via optical paths(704,706)), wherein the first block sequence includes a plurality of first single photons related to the quantum signal (See Paragraph 56, fig. 7 i.e. wherein the first block sequence includes a plurality of first single photons(Photon A, Photon B) related to the quantum signal); generating a plurality of second single photons based on the configuration information(See Paragraph 56, fig. 7 i.e. generating a plurality of second single photons(Photon A, Photon B) based on the configuration information) Lukens does not explicitly disclose inputting first and second single photons related to each other into a beam splitter (BS); and determining whether there are errors in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS. Han teaches generating a plurality of second single photons based on the configuration information(See Paragraph 35, fig. 1 i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) (111) of the first communication device(110) for generating a plurality of second single photons based on the configuration information); inputting first and second single photons related to each other into a beam splitter (BS)(See Paragraph 40,57, fig. 1 i.e. inputting first and second single photons related to each other into a beam splitter (BS)(122) of the second communication device(120)); and determining whether there are errors in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS(See Paragraph 38,41,58, fig. 1 i.e. photodetectors(123,124) for determining whether there are errors(verify a quantum signature) in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Lukens, and have first and second single photons related to each other to be inputted into a beam splitter (BS); and determine whether there are errors in the quantum channel based on a number of detection paths of a photon output from the BS, as taught by Han, thus improving transmission signal quality by optimizing security by creating unforgeable quantum signature pair using a splitter, as discussed by Han (Paragraph 1,57). Considering Claim 7 Lukens and Han disclose the communication device of claim 6, wherein the first single photons have N-dimensional properties, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2(See Paragraph 46,48, fig. 1 i.e. the first single photons have N-dimensional properties, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 2(since the photons are rotated by three dimensional vector by polarization plates(114-1…114-3)). Claim 11 is rejected for the same reason as in claim 6. Claim 12 is rejected for the same reason as in claim 7. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5,8-10,13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIBRET A WOLDEKIDAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5145. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID C PAYNE can be reached at (571)272-3024. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIBRET A WOLDEKIDAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683691
COHERENT OPTICS CHANNEL DISCOVERY AND PROGRAMMABILITY FOR OPTICAL NETWORKS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683705
Optical Signal Amplification Apparatus and Method
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671516
DUMMY-LIGHT GENERATION DEVICE, OPTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND DUMMY-LIGHT GENERATION METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659037
PLURALITY OF EMITTERS FOR COUPLING LASER BEAMS INTO A MULTI-MODE OPTICAL FIBER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659633
OPTICAL NETWORK UNIT, OPTICAL LINE TERMINAL AND METHOD, DEVICE AND MEDIUM FOR COMMUNICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month