Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/696,923

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCT/JP2021/036259 +1 more
Examiner
NDIAYE, CHEIKH T
Art Unit
2447
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
585 granted / 739 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant amended claims 7-10 in the amendment filed on 07/09/2026. The claims 7-10 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 7 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yuan et al (US Patent application No. 2023/0422180 A1) in view of Deghel et al (US Patent Publication No. 2024/0023026 A1). With respect to claim 7, Yuan teaches a terminal comprising: a receiver that receives a single frequency network (SFN) physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) for triggering a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) to be repetitively transmitted (paragraph 0082 discloses the base station may transmit the multiple PDCCH repetitions according to a single frequency network (SFN) configuration. For example, when the PDCCH is associated with an SFN repetition configuration, the base station transmits the DCI message in one CORESET using multiple TCI states (e.g., using different downlink beams that are associated with different antenna panels and/or different TRPs, among other examples; a PDCCH scheduling the uplink transmission is associated with a repetition configuration with multiple CORESETs and/or a CORESET associated with multiple TCI states). Yuan does not explicitly disclose a processor that determines a spatial relation or a pathloss reference signal used for the PUCCH, by using a quasi-co-location (QCL) assumption of a control resource set (CORESET) associated with two linked search spaces for the PDCCH. However, Deghel teaches a processor that determines a spatial relation or a pathloss reference signal used for the PUCCH, by using a quasi-co-location (QCL) assumption of a control resource set (CORESET) associated with two linked search spaces for the PDCCH (paragraph 0055; 0056 disclose the UE may detect the need to determine two RS resources to use for the calculation of two pathloss values to be used for PUCCH; The first RS resource may be the RS of the first TCI or QCL assumption of the CORESET with the lest index having two TCI states or QCL assumptions, and the second RS resource may be the RS of the second TCI or QCL assumption of this same CORESET) in order to efficiently perform transmission repetitions (Abstract). Therefore, based on Yuan in view of Deghel, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Deghel to the system of Yuan in order to efficiently perform transmission repetitions. The limitations of claim 8 are rejected in the analysis of claim 7 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. The limitations of claim 9 are rejected in the analysis of claim 7 above, and the claim is rejected on that basis. With respect to claim 10, Yuan teaches a system comprising a base station and a terminal ((base station 110 and terminal 120, Figs.3 and 7A), wherein the base station comprises: a transmitter that transmits a single frequency network (SFN) physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) for triggering a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) to be repetitively transmitted (paragraph 0082 disclose the base station transmitting the multiple PDCCH repetitions according to a single frequency network (SFN) configuration. For example, when the PDCCH is associated with an SFN repetition configuration, the base station transmits the DCI message in one CORESET using multiple TCI states (e.g., using different downlink beams that are associated with different antenna panels and/or different TRPs, among other examples; a PDCCH scheduling the uplink transmission is associated with a repetition configuration with multiple CORESETs and/or a CORESET associated with multiple TCI states); and the terminal (UE 120) comprises: a receiver that receives the PDCCH (paragraph 0081-0083 disclose a UE receiving multiple repetitions of a PDCCH from a base station). Yuan does not explicitly disclose a processor that determines a spatial relation or a pathloss reference signal used for the PUCCH, by using a quasi-co-location (QCL) assumption of a control resource set (CORESET) associated with two linked search spaces for the PDCCH. However, Deghel teaches a processor that determines a spatial relation or a pathloss reference signal used for the PUCCH, by using a quasi-co-location (QCL) assumption of a control resource set (CORESET) associated with two linked search spaces for the PDCCH (paragraph 0055; 0056 disclose the UE may detect the need to determine two RS resources to use for the calculation of two pathloss values to be used for PUCCH; The first RS resource may be the RS of the first TCI or QCL assumption of the CORESET with the lest index having two TCI states or QCL assumptions, and the second RS resource may be the RS of the second TCI or QCL assumption of this same CORESET) in order to efficiently perform transmission repetitions (Abstract). Therefore, based on Yuan in view of Deghel, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Deghel to the system of Yuan in order to efficiently perform transmission repetitions. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHEIKH T NDIAYE whose telephone number is (571)270-3914. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOON H HWANG can be reached at 571-272-4036. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHEIKH T NDIAYE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2447 9/14/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739886
Random Access Identifier for Reduced Capability Device
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739053
METHOD, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PERFORMING CHANNEL ENCODING, AND METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR PERFORMING CHANNEL DECODING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733057
Methods for 5G-NR RRC Connection Re-Establishment when Security is not Activated
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732459
GATEWAY CONNECTION DEVICE, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732250
CHANNEL STATE FEEDBACK METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 9m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month