Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/697,034

Masterbatch, Method for Producing Masterbatch, Rubber Composition for Tires, Method for Producing Rubber Composition for Tires, and Rubber Material for Tires

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 29, 2024
Priority
Oct 01, 2021 — JP 2021-162925 +2 more
Examiner
SALAMON, PETER A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tokuyama Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
725 granted / 840 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
852
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 840 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 2 and 4 – 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP 2015183061A to Satoshi, Mihara hereinafter “Satoshi”. A machine translated copy of Satoshi is included with this action. Satoshi is directed to improving the workability of dry type (fumed) silica and the manufacturing of rubber compositions for tires. Regarding claims 1 – 2, 4 – 11 and 13, Satoshi teaches the manufacture of a masterbatch in the Table 2, Example 1, [0045] where the masterbatch comprises 30 parts of silica (fumed), 7.2 parts of silane coupling agent, 2 parts of a processing aid and 10 parts of an oil (lubricant). This corresponds to 60.97% fumed silica, 14.63% silane coupling agent, 4.06 % processing aid and 20.33% of an oil. This is listed in the pre-mixing process of Table 2. Sixty, 60 parts of this masterbatch is combined with 100 parts of (SBR/BR) rubber. SBR = styrene butadiene rubber and BR = butadiene rubber. This amounts to 36.58 phr fumed silica, 8.78 phr silane coupling agent and 12.20 phr oil. These values are all within the ranges claimed. This step is listed as the kneading process in Table 2. Satoshi teaches that the nitrogen adsorption specific surface area of the dry silica (fumed silica) is >160 and <500 m2/g (page 4, paragraph 6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2015183061A to Satoshi, Mihara hereinafter “Satoshi”. A machine translated copy of Satoshi is included with this action. Satoshi is directed to improving the workability of dry type (fumed) silica and the manufacturing of rubber compositions for tires. Regarding claim 3, Satoshi teaches that the diene rubber used may include natural rubber, isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile butadiene rubber, butyl rubber, ethylene propylene diene rubber, chloroprene rubber and the like (page 7, paragraph 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to use natural or isoprene rubber in the tire compositions using the masterbatch process to incorporate the fumed silica as this is directly taught by Satoshi. As to claim 12, Satoshi is silent as to the hardness and crosslink density of the rubber material. Both Satoshi and 18/697034 are directed to reducing the rolling resistance of a pneumatic tire (page 3, para 2, page 9, para 4) and the spec at [0002]. Satoshi teaches at (page 9, para 4) that the smaller the value of the tan δ at 60C equates to the smaller the rolling resistance and the better the fuel consumption. Therefore, as both Satoshi and the application are dedicated to reducing the rolling resistance of pneumatic tires it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill to engineer the required properties such as loss tangent tan δ at 60C, hardness and crosslink density that form the requirements for a pneumatic tire with reduced rolling resistance. Prior Art of Record JP 2015183061 A to Satoshi. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER A. SALAMON whose telephone number is 571-270-3018. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9AM - 6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAS 9/18/26 /PETER A SALAMON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735580
ANTIMICROBIAL COATINGS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735563
RESIN COMPOSITION AND PRODUCT THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729251
ALGINATE-BASED POLYMERS AND PRODUCTS, AND THEIR MANUFACTURE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729327
Aqueous Adhesive Composition
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723140
PARTICLES CONSISTING OF AN ORGANIC POLYMER CORE, A FIRST INORGANIC OXIDE SHELL INCORPORATING A MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND A MESOPOROUS SECOND INORGANIC SHELL
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 840 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month