Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/697,058

DEVICE FOR ILLUMINATING VALUE DOCUMENTS, SENSOR FOR TESTING VALUE DOCUMENTS, AND VALUE DOCUMENT-PROCESSING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 29, 2024
Examiner
BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
347 granted / 543 resolved
-4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
573
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 543 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 17, 18, 22, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With respect to claim 17, the limitation “a heat source and/or heat hotspot occurring or located on the carrier element” lacks antecedent basis. It is unclear if the claim is indicating a claimed structural element within the device or acknowledging an exterior characteristic. If the “heat source” is to be part of the claimed device, it needs to be positively recited as a claimed element. Otherwise, any potential “heat source and/or heat hotspot” is an intended use limitation and cannot structurally define the first portion of the row. With respect to claim 18, the limitation “panel-shaped” lacks a clear definition. There is well understood definition for “panel-shaped” in this art and generally speaking “panel-shaped” has many different definitions based upon the area of interest. For example, a panel-shaped door may be rectangular with different level insets or a “panel-shaped” skirt is made out of several triangular pieces. In its broadest sense, panel usually refers to a flat surface. It is unclear what is meant by the phrase and the specification provides no additional definition. Clarification is required. With respect to claims 22 and 23, the limitation “one or more devices for processing including separating, transporting, testing, sorting, dispending, and/or destroying” is unclear. It is unclear if the “separating, transporting, testing, sorting, dispensing, and/or destroying” are further defining “processing” or if they are in addition to any processing. In addition, the limitation “in particular banknotes” is unclear if the valuable document is optionally or required to be banknotes. Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 12-16, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Albines U.S. Patent #12,106,592. With respect to claim 12, Albines discloses a document reader comprising: A carrier element (Figure 2, 3, carrier element = light chamber 200) A plurality of radiation sources arranged on the carrier element in a row configured to emit electromagnetic radiation for illuminating a valuable document (Figure 3, plurality of radiation sources = 50, Col.6, l 53-62) Wherein a cutout is provided in the carrier element in a manner spaced apart from the radiation sources arranged in the row and extending over a first portion of the row (Figure 2, cutout = transparent platform 10c in top cover) Wherein the carrier element has a heat transfer capability in a region of the carrier element located in the first portion of the row which is reduced in relation to that in a region of the carrier element located in another portion of the row (Col.7, l 37-38, inherent that any structure placed in an open travel path of radiation will reduce the heat transfer of that radiation) With respect to claim 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23, Albines discloses all of the limitations as applied to claim 12 above. In addition, Albines discloses: 13- The row in which the radiation sources are arranged runs in a substantially straight line (Figure 3, array of LEDs 50) 14- the cutout extends substantially parallel to the row (Figure 3, the plane of the cut out is parallel to the plane of the LED array) 15- the first portion of the row, over which the cutout extends, is located at one end of the row (Figure 3, the cut out seems to extend over the entire row of LEDs which includes at least one end of the row) 16- the cutout is located at an edge of the carrier element (Figure 2, wherein the cutout = transparent platform 10c is at the top edge of the carrier element= light chamber 200) 19- the cutout is in the form of a depression, in particular a contiguous depression, in the carrier element (Col.11, l 35-46, wherein the cutout is the area without the “sticker” or coating such that it is a depression/sunken area within the surface 10d) 20- the cutout is in the form of a perforation, in particular a contiguous perforation (Figure 3, cutout is a perforation/hole in the frame filled by a transparent platform) 21- a device for detecting the radiation emanating from a valuable document irradiated with electromagnetic radiation by the illumination device (Figure 3, device for detecting = camera 40, Col.2, l 14-23) 22/23- device for processing valuable documents (Col.1, l 52-54, Col.2, l 60-61, device = kiosk) Claim(s) 12-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Takenouchi et al. U.S. Publication 2015/0036891. With respect to claim 12, Takenouchi discloses an object verification device comprising: A carrier element (Figure 4, 5, carrier element = support element 6) A plurality of radiation sources arranged on the carrier element in a row configured to emit electromagnetic radiation for illuminating a valuable document (Figure 4, 5, plurality of radiation sources = LED array 7) Wherein a cutout is provided in the carrier element in a manner spaced apart from the radiation sources arranged in the row and extending over a first portion of the row (Figure 4, 5, cutout = unlabeled rectangular notch in the side of the support 6, wherein first portion of the row = UV1-WL1 alongside the notch) Wherein the carrier element has a heat transfer capability in a region of the carrier element located in the first portion of the row which is reduced in relation to that in a region of the carrier element located in another portion of the row (inherent that having a cutout will reduce the heat transfer of the carrier element by not having structure for the heat to transfer through, more so than the side areas that have a contiguous support surface) With respect to claim 13-23, Takenouchi discloses all of the limitations as applied to claim 12 above. In addition, Takenouchi discloses: 13- The row in which the radiation sources are arranged runs in a substantially straight line (Figure 5, LED array 7) 14- the cutout extends substantially parallel to the row (Figure 5, cutout extends alongside end of one row = portion of row with UV1-WL2) 15- the first portion of the row, over which the cutout extends, is located at one end of the row (Figure 5, cutout extends alongside end of one row = portion of row with UV1-WL2) 16- the cutout is located at an edge of the carrier element (Figure 5, cutout is along edge of 6) 17- the first portion of the row has a greater distance from a heat source on the carrier element during the operation of the device than the other portion of the row (Figure 5, wherein a heat source = any light sources at the opposite end of the carrier 6 from the cutout) 18- the carrier element has a panel shaped carrier on which the radiation sources are arranged and in which the cutout is provided (Figure 5, panel is not a defined shape, could be any form, support 6 could be interpreted as a panel shape, see 112 above) 19- the cutout is in the form of a depression, in particular a contiguous depression, in the carrier element (Figure 5, the cutout is a bump in along edge of 6 = depression) 20- the cutout is in the form of a perforation, in particular a contiguous perforation (Figure 5, the cutout is an area perforated from the surface 6) 21- a device for detecting the radiation emanating from a valuable document irradiated with electromagnetic radiation by the illumination device (Figure 4, device for detecting radiation = camera 13) 22/23- device for processing valuable documents (P.0008, P.0085) Citation The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Sato et al. U.S. Publication 2024/0312280 discloses an optical sensor for bill validation Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REBECCA CAROLE BRYANT whose telephone number is (571)272-9787. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 12-4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 5712723995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REBECCA C BRYANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596064
DYNAMIC 3D LIGHT SCATTERING PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION With Offset Polarization Beams
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584840
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MEASURING FINE BUBBLE DISPERSION LIQUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578282
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING A GLASS SHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578188
CALIBRATION APPARATUS, PROCESSING SYSTEM AND CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12523588
OPTICAL FORCE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+31.7%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 543 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month