Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/697,941

MOTOR WITH INTEGRATED CONTROL AND ELECTRONIC UNIT COOLING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 02, 2024
Examiner
KENERLY, TERRANCE L
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SAFRAN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
828 granted / 1129 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1162
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 8 & 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sturm et al. (DE 102015105377). [Claim 1] Sturm et al. teach: A smart motor (1) comprising: - an electric machine (rotor 36 and stator 7, fig 2) having at least one turning part 36 mounted to a rotating shaft (12), - an electronic control unit (2) configured to drive the electric machine (rotor 36 and stator 7, fig 2), - a casing (14) comprising a first cavity (annotated fig 2 below) in which the electric machine (rotor 36 and stator 7, fig 2) is housed and a second cavity (annotated fig 2 below), adjacent to the first cavity, in which the electronic control unit (2) is housed, the first and second cavities both having the rotating shaft (12) passing therethrough, - at least one thermal partition (5) mounted at a junction between the first cavity (annotated fig 2 below) and the second cavity (annotated fig 2 below), a centrifugal pump (4) mounted to the rotating shaft (12), at the junction between the first cavity (annotated fig 2 below) and the second cavity (annotated fig 2 below) of the casing, and configured to generate circulation of an air flow from the second cavity to the first cavity of the casing (via intakes 20 & 21). PNG media_image1.png 505 788 media_image1.png Greyscale [Claim 2] Sturm et al. teach: The smart motor according to claim 1, wherein the centrifugal pump (4) comprises a plurality of rotary blades (since it is a dual-flow cooling wheel) mounted in a ring to a cylinder (since it is a dual-flow cooling wheel) integral with the rotating shaft (12), the rotary blades (since it is a dual-flow cooling wheel) generating, when rotating, a pressure difference between the first cavity (from intake 10, fig 2 above) and the second cavity (since there is flow leaving the 1st cavity into and out of the 2nd cavity). [Claim 8] Sturm et al. teach: The smart motor according to claim 1, wherein the casing (2 & 3) includes drain ports (8 &11) ensuring circulation of the air flow within said casing (see the arrows representing airflow, fig 2 above). [Claim 9] Sturm et al. teach: The smart motor according to claim 8, wherein at least one drain port (8 &11) is located in a first outer wall (24) of the second cavity (annotated fig 2 above) and at least one drain port (8 &11) is located in a circular shell (26) of the casing, at the periphery of the first cavity (between cover 24 and electronics housing part 26, fig 2 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 3-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sturm et al. in view of Bradfield (US 20150042213). [Claim 3] Sturm et al. has been discussed above, re claim 2; but does not teach that the cylinder of the centrifugal pump includes, at one end, a shoulder providing bypass of the centrifugal air flow. Bradfield teaches that the cylinder of the centrifugal pump 104 includes, at one end, a shoulder 114 (it protrudes slightly beyond the blades, fig below) providing bypass of the centrifugal air flow to improve air-exchange efficiency which prolongs the service life of the motor (Bradfield para 0006). PNG media_image2.png 435 732 media_image2.png Greyscale Consequently, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art prior to the invention of Sturm et al. being effectively filed to modify it so that the cylinder of the centrifugal pump includes, at one end, a shoulder providing bypass of the centrifugal air flow, as taught by Bradfield so as to prolong the service life of the motor. [Claim 4] Sturm et al. in view of Bradfield teach: The smart motor according to claim 3, wherein the shoulder (of Bradfield) is substantially parallel to the thermal partition (of Sturm et al. since it extends slightly radially, Bradfield fig above) so that said thermal partition channels (Sturm et al. fig above, shows outlets which are adjacent to the partition 5) the air flow. [Claim 5] Sturm et al. in view of Bradfield teach: The smart motor according to claim 2, wherein the rotary blades (110 of Bradfield) each comprise a bent shape with a convex surface (122 of Bradfield) integral with the cylinder (112 of Bradfield) (see Bradfield fig 3). [Claim 6] Sturm et al. in view of Bradfield teach: The smart motor according to claim 2, wherein the rotary blades (of Bradfield) are inclined or cambered (Bradfield annotated fig 3 below), with a shape adapted to the need for air circulation (Bradfield annotated fig 3 below), each rotary blade comprising a side surface (Bradfield annotated fig 3 below) askew relative to a plane perpendicular (Bradfield annotated fig 3 below) to a plane tangential (Bradfield annotated fig 3 below) to the cylinder (112 of Bradfield) of the centrifugal pump. PNG media_image3.png 661 789 media_image3.png Greyscale [Claim 7] Sturm et al. teach: The smart motor according to claim 2, wherein the rotary blades (Bradfield annotated fig 3 above) are planar, each rotary blade comprising a side surface (see askewed surface, Bradfield annotated fig 3 above) contained in a plane perpendicular to a plane tangential to the cylinder (Bradfield annotated fig 3 above) of the centrifugal pump (the askewed surface is contained in the plane, Bradfield annotated fig above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRANCE L KENERLY whose telephone number is (571)270-7851. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRANCE L KENERLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603539
HEAT EXCHANGER AND ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICE ASSEMBLY INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603545
AXIALLY SECURING A SHAFT COMPONENT OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597818
ROTOR FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590619
DRIVE SYSTEM COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE DRIVE UNIT, IN PARTICULAR FOR APPLICATIONS WITH HIGH ROTATIONAL SPEED, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588579
UNIVERSAL JOINT SHAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month