Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/698,880

AIRFOIL CATALYTIC REACTOR FOR ATMOSPHERIC AIR TREATMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Priority
Oct 05, 2021 — provisional 63/252,299 +1 more
Examiner
CHORBAJI, MONZER R
Art Unit
1799
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Bomvento Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
921 granted / 1205 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1223
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.4%
+23.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1205 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA This is a first action on the merits for this regular application filed on 04/05/2024 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-9, and 19-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fine et al. (US 2011/0180149 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 29-30, Fine et al. discloses an open-air catalytic reactor (Fig.1:10) used for atmospheric air treatment [0003] is capable of removing greenhouse gases and a method of that is capable of catalyzing removal of greenhouse gases from atmospheric air [0003 and 0009], comprising: an airfoil [0005]; and catalytic material on the surface of said airfoil shape (Fig.1:108), an artificial light source (page 6, claim 26) positioned to activate the catalytic material by light delivery thereto; at least one airfoil of a horizontal axis wind turbine [0025]; catalytic material on the surface of said airfoil (Fig.1:108); an artificial light source (page 6, claim 26) positioned to illuminate the at least one airfoil and activate the catalytic material by light delivery thereto; providing an airfoil [0025] coated with a catalytic material; moving said airfoil through atmospheric air [0040] as a rotating blade of a horizontal axis wind turbine; and illuminating the catalytic material (page 6, claim 26) using an artificial illumination source, while the airfoil is rotating. Regarding claim 2, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material comprises a photocatalyst [0039]. Regarding claim 3, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material fully covers the airfoil [0040]. Regarding claim 4, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material comprises a plurality of mutually distinct compositions on the same said airfoil [0040 and 0043]. Regarding claim 5, Fine et al. discloses that the plurality of mutually distinct compositions are distributed on a respective plurality of mutually distinct regions [0040]. Regarding claim 6, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material is applied to said airfoil as catalytic material upon a film substrate [0042]. Regarding claim 8, Fine et al. discloses that the artificial light source is embedded on said airfoil [0040]. Regarding claim 9, Fine et al. discloses that the artificial light source is external to said airfoil and projecting light toward said airfoil from a distance [0040]. Regarding claim 19, Fine et al. discloses a horizontal axis wind turbine; wherein the airfoil is a blade of said horizontal axis wind turbine [0025]. Regarding claim 20, the horizontal axis wind turbine in Fine et al. is capable of powering the artificial light source [0025 and 0040]. Regarding claim 21, Fine et al. open-air catalytic reactor [0009] is capable of catalyzing greenhouse gases, including N2O and CH₄. Regarding claim 22, Fine et al. discloses that the plurality of mutually distinct compositions of catalytic material [0024 and 0039] are distributed to said respective plurality of mutually distinct regions according to positions which relatively optimize reacting with a respective greenhouse gas, according to conditions of airflow near the airfoil. Regarding claim 23, Fine et al. discloses that the mutually distinct compositions are capable of being distinguished [0009 and 0039] according to which of a respective plurality of greenhouse gases they most efficiently react with. Regarding claim 24, Fine et al. discloses that the mutually distinct regions [0024] comprise at least one region on a suction surface of said airfoil. Regarding claim 25, Fine et al. discloses that the mutually distinct regions [0024] comprise at least one region on a pressure surface of said airfoil. Regarding claim 26, Fine et al. discloses that the mutually distinct regions [0024] comprise at least one region at a tip of said airfoil, and another region at a base of said airfoil. Regarding claim 27, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material comprises Ag-TiO₂ and Ag-ZnO [0039]. Regarding claim 28, Fine et al. discloses that the catalytic material comprises an electrocatalyst [0039-0040]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONZER R CHORBAJI whose telephone number is (571)272-1271. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-12:00 and 6:00-9:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jill J Warden can be reached at (571)272-1267. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONZER R CHORBAJI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678526
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISINFECTING PLUMBING FIXTURES AND ROOMS WITH PLUMBING FIXTURES
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673286
Sterilizing Cabinet Filter Assembly
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672654
Method for Controlling Microbial Growth in Sugar Processing
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673124
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PLASMA-DISINFECTING A CHANNEL BY DIRECT PLASMA
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672502
ADDITION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF REDUCING AGENT IN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 6m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1205 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month