Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/699,076

AUDIO AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECT PLAYBACK DEVICE AND AUDIO AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECT PLAYBACK METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Examiner
KURR, JASON R
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Maxell, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
524 granted / 697 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
720
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 697 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 9-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jarvinen et al (US 20180220250 A1). With respect to claim 1, Jarvinen discloses an audio augmented reality object playback device comprising: a microphone (fig.3 #606; fig.6 #11); an audio playback device to be worn on a left ear side and a right ear side of a listener (Par.[0084][0095] “headphones”); and a processor (fig.6 #21) connected to each of the microphone and the audio playback device, the processor being configured to (Par.[0090][0097] processor #21 of electronic device #10 may perform the processing functions of the audio signals received by microphones #11,606 and via transmission channel #503): place an audio augmented reality object in a real space (Par.[0112] first detector and separator #602 places augmented reality objects received from surround sound decoder #504 in a real space by generating parameters that describe a direction, distance and loudness of each object); acquire a stereoscopic audio signal from the audio augmented reality object to carry out control for causing the audio playback device to output a sound based on the stereoscopic audio signal (Par.[0084] binaural stereo downmixer #505 generates a stereoscopic audio signal to output to the headphones); detect a level of a sound in the real space collected by the microphone and a sound source direction of the sound in the real space and correct a placement position of the audio augmented reality object based on a result of the detection so as to separate the placement position of the audio augmented reality object from the sound source direction of the sound in the real space (Par.[0123] detector and separator of audio objects 2 #604 receives audio sounds captured in the real space via microphones #606 and generates parametric representations for determined objects within the captured sounds; Par.[0128] a level of the captured sound objects may be detected “loudness threshold check”; Par.[0133] repositioner #603 may separate a placement position of the augmented reality objects based on a loudness level of the sound objects in the real space, and based on whether the augmented reality objects are in a shadow of the sound objects in the real space, wherein a shadowing of objects is based on a determined direction of each object, as shown in figure 2); and carry out control for causing the audio playback device to output the sound based on the stereoscopic sound signal at the placement position as corrected (Par.[0142-0143]). With respect to claim 2, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to: execute audio recognition processing to recognize the sound in the real space collected by the microphone; and based on a result of the audio recognition processing, combine the sound in the real space and the stereoscopic audio signal and output the stereoscopic audio signal as combined to the audio playback device (Par.[0123] “the second detector and separator can be considered to analyse the local or environmental audio scene to determine any localised audio sources or audio objects with respect to the listener or user of the apparatus”). With respect to claim 3, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to, when a level difference between the level of the sound in the real space collected by the microphone and a level of the stereoscopic sound signal is less than a level difference threshold set to determine that the sound in the real space and the sound of the augmented reality object are confused, and also when the sound source direction of the sound in the real space and a direction of the placement position of the augmented reality object are within a same direction range set to determine that the sound in the real space and the sound of the augmented reality object are confused, correct the placement position of the augmented reality object so as to separate the placement position of the audio augmented 49 reality object from the sound source direction of the sound in the real space (Par.[0128-0134] repositioning of objects may be based on a loudness threshold and a directional shadowing effect of objects). With respect to claim 9, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, wherein the processor is provided in a mobile information terminal or a wearable terminal, the microphone and the audio playback device are provided in earphones or a headphone which is configured separately from the mobile information terminal, and the mobile information terminal and the earphones or the headphone are connected to each other by communication (Par.[0091-0096]). With respect to claim 10, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, wherein the processor is provided in a mobile information terminal, and the microphone, the audio playback device, and the processor are integrally configured with a head-mounted display (Par.[0091-0096]). With respect to claim 11, Jarvinen discloses an audio augmented reality object playback method comprising the steps of: placing an audio augmented reality object in a real space (Par.[0112] first detector and separator #602 places augmented reality objects received from surround sound decoder #504 in a real space by generating parameters that describe a direction, distance and loudness of each object); acquiring a stereoscopic audio signal from the audio augmented reality object to carry out control for causing an audio playback device to output a sound based on the stereoscopic audio signal (Par.[0084] binaural stereo downmixer #505 generates a stereoscopic audio signal to output to the headphones); detecting a level of a sound in the real space collected by a microphone and a sound source direction of the sound in the real space and correcting a placement position of the audio augmented reality object based on a result of the detection so as to separate the placement position of the audio augmented reality object from the sound source direction of the sound in the real space (Par.[0123] detector and separator of audio objects 2 #604 receives audio sounds captured in the real space via microphones #606 and generates parametric representations for determined objects within the captured sounds; Par.[0128] a level of the captured sound objects may be detected “loudness threshold check”; Par.[0133] repositioner #603 may separate a placement position of the augmented reality objects based on a loudness level of the sound objects in the real space, and based on whether the augmented reality objects are in a shadow of the sound objects in the real space, wherein a shadowing of objects is based on a determined direction of each object, as shown in figure 2); and carry out control for causing the audio playback device to output the sound based on the stereoscopic sound signal at the placement position as corrected (Par.[0142-0143]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jarvinen et al (US 20180220250 A1). With respect to claim 7, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, however does not disclose expressly wherein the audio augmented reality object is placed in a world coordinate system fixed to the real space. Official Notice is taken that the use of coordinate systems, such as a world coordinate system, is well known in the art for placing virtual sound objects within a real space. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use such a coordinate system to place the sound objects of Jarvinen at an appropriate location. The motivation for doing so would have been to use a standardized system for reproduction of virtual sound objects at desired locations. With respect to claim 8, Jarvinen discloses the audio augmented reality object playback device according to claim 1, however does not disclose expressly wherein the audio augmented reality object is placed in a local coordinate system fixed to the audio playback device. Official Notice is taken that the use of coordinate systems, such as a local coordinate system, is well known in the art for placing virtual sound objects within a real space. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use such a coordinate system to place the sound objects of Jarvinen at an appropriate location. The motivation for doing so would have been to use a standardized system for reproduction of virtual sound objects at desired locations. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lovitt (US 20120114130 A1) discloses cognitive load reduction. Laaksonen et al (US 20190394607 A1) discloses an apparatus for presentation of first and second virtual or augmented reality content. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON R KURR whose telephone number is (571)270-5981. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at (571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JASON R. KURR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2695 /JASON R KURR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603077
ACTIVE SOUND GENERATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598439
POWER FAULT RECOVERY MECHANISM FOR AN AUDIO SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598424
Zoned Audio Duck For In Car Conversation
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598414
System And Method For Generating An Audio Signal
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597411
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIRTUAL MICROPHONES IN ACTIVE NOISE CANCELLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month