Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/699,400

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HARMONIZATION OF VERTICAL PROJECTIONS FOR DISPLAYING OF GEOSPATIAL OBJECT DATA IN MEDIATED REALITY

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Priority
Oct 08, 2021 — provisional 11/836,855 +1 more
Examiner
WANG, YI
Art Unit
2619
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Vgis Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
370 granted / 483 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
507
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 483 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No.11,836,855. The claims are identical between the current application 18/699,400 and US Patent No. 11,836,855. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Table: 1 Mapping of contending claims in the patent that contains double patenting issues. Current Application (18/699,400) Patent (11,836,855) 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YI WANG whose telephone number is (571)272-6022. The examiner can normally be reached 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Chan can be reached at (571)272-3022. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YI WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12614481
PROJECTION DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614486
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614360
HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY, CONTROL METHOD OF HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12579758
DEVICES, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR INTERACTING WITH VIRTUAL OBJECTS USING HAND GESTURES
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579752
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING AND FURNISHING DIGITAL MODELS OF INDOOR SPACES
2y 12m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 483 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month