Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/699,770

RADIO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FOR NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORKS WITH MULTIPLE SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL BLOCK-BASED MEASUREMENT TIMING CONFIGURATIONS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 09, 2024
Priority
Oct 22, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021125742
Examiner
NGUYEN, THE HY
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
244 granted / 328 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
358
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 08/18/2026 with respect to claim(s) 1, 3-6, 19, 40, and 42-48 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection under 103 as being unpatentable over Tao et al. (US 2024/0406771 A1) in view of Jin et al. (US 2022/0321310 A1). Applicant’s argument: Regarding claims 1 and 40, Applicant amended the claims to include “the plurality of SMTCs are represented in the measurement object configuration using a first SMTC set for the first periodicity and a second SMTC set for a second periodicity, wherein the first SMTC set comprises first one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the first periodicity, and wherein the second SMTC set comprises second one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the second periodicity” and argues that “[b]ecause “the value for Period1 and Period2 may be the same or different” under Tao, it is clear there is no periodicity-based delineation/organization being imposed as between these SMTCs within Tao’s measurement object.” Examiner’s response: With respect to claim 1, Examiner submits that Jin discloses the limitation in [0104]: an SMTC1 and an SMTC2 are included in the MeasObjectNR IE. The SMTC1 is a primary Measurement Timing Configuration, and the SMTC2 is a secondary Measurement Timing Configuration, according to the introduction of the MeasObjectNR field description. When the signals are synchronized, the Periodicity is represented by a Periodicity in the SMTC2, and the time offset is equal to the offset indicated in the Periodicity with a periodicityAndOffset coefficient. The Periodicity in the SMTC2 can only be configured to a value strictly shorter than the Periodicity indicated by periodicityAndOffset in the SMTC1. For example, if periodicityAndOffset indicates sf10, then Periodicity can only be configured to sf5. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-6, 40, and 42-45 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tao et al. (US 2024/0406771 A1) in view of Jin et al. (US 2022/0321310 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 40, Tao discloses A method of a user equipment (UE) (claim 1) and An apparatus of a user equipment (UE), comprising one or more baseband processors configured to cause the UE to (claim 40) (Figs. 3 and 7, [0106]: UE includes a processor 720): receiving, from a base station, a measurement object configuration for a carrier used by one or more non-terrestrial network (NTN) intra-frequency neighbor cells of the UE (Fig. 3, [0031]: the network device 102 sends measurement configuration information to the user equipment. The measurement configuration information includes more than one SSB-based RRM measurement timing configuration (SMTC) corresponding to a same measurement object. [0032]: the user equipment 101 receives the measurement configuration information from the network device 102. [0034]: the measurement object is the carrier corresponding to the cell. [0035]: different SMTCs are set for different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object, allowing the user equipment to measure different neighbor cells under the same carrier. Fig. 1, [0003]-[0004]: NTN includes cells 1-3), the measurement object configuration comprising a plurality of synchronization signal block (SSB)-based measurement timing configurations (SMTCs), each of the plurality of SMTCs having periodicity information and offset information for SSB measurements on the carrier ([0031]: The measurement configuration information includes more than one SSB-based RRM measurement timing configuration (SMTC) corresponding to a same measurement object. [0035]: different SMTCs are set for different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object, allowing the user equipment to measure different neighbor cells under the same carrier. [0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}, and the SMTC configuration for cell2 is SMTC #2 {Offset2, Period2, Duration2}. Here, Offset1 and Offset2 are different, and the values for Period1 and Period2 may be the same), wherein: a first of the plurality of SMTCs indicates a first periodicity and a first offset and a second of the plurality of SMTCs indicates the first periodicity and a second offset ([0062]: in the SMTCs of different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object in the measurement configuration information, the offset values are different, and the period values are the same. [0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}, and the SMTC configuration for cell2 is SMTC #2 {Offset2, Period2, Duration2}. Here, Offset1 and Offset2 are different, and the values for Period1 and Period2 may be the same); and the plurality of SMTCs are represented in the measurement object configuration using a first SMTC set for the first periodicity and a second SMTC set for a second periodicity, wherein the first SMTC set comprises first one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the first periodicity, and wherein the second SMTC set comprises second one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the second periodicity; performing one of the SSB measurements on one of the one or more NTN intra-frequency neighbor cells according to one of the plurality of SMTCs (Fig. 3, [0033]: the user equipment 101 measures the neighbor cell to be measured corresponding to the measurement object according to the measurement configuration information. [0031]: The measurement configuration information includes more than one SSB-based RRM measurement timing configuration (SMTC) corresponding to a same measurement object. [0035]: different SMTCs are set for different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object, allowing the user equipment to measure different neighbor cells under the same carrier. Fig. 1, [0003]-[0004]: NTN includes cells 1-3). Tao does not disclose, but Jin discloses the plurality of SMTCs are represented in the measurement object configuration using a first SMTC set for the first periodicity and a second SMTC set for a second periodicity, wherein the first SMTC set comprises first one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the first periodicity, and wherein the second SMTC set comprises second one or more SMTCs of the plurality of SMTCs indicating the second periodicity ([0104]: an SMTC1 and an SMTC2 are included in the MeasObjectNR IE. The SMTC1 is a primary Measurement Timing Configuration, and the SMTC2 is a secondary Measurement Timing Configuration, according to the introduction of the MeasObjectNR field description. When the signals are synchronized, the Periodicity is represented by a Periodicity in the SMTC2, and the time offset is equal to the offset indicated in the Periodicity with a periodicityAndOffset coefficient. The Periodicity in the SMTC2 can only be configured to a value strictly shorter than the Periodicity indicated by periodicityAndOffset in the SMTC1. For example, if periodicityAndOffset indicates sf10, then Periodicity can only be configured to sf5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the measurement configuration, as taught by Tao, to include SMTC1 and SMTC2 where Periodicity in the SMTC2 can only be configured to a value strictly shorter than the Periodicity indicated by periodicityAndOffset in the SMTC1, as taught by Jin. Doing so provides SSB information for each beam cell (Jin: [0102]-[0104]). Regarding claim(s) 3 and 42, Tao in view of Jin discloses all features of claim(s) 2 and 41 as outlined above. Tao discloses wherein each of the first one or more SMTCs indicates for a use of a unique offset as among the first one or more SMTCs ([0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}). Regarding claim(s) 4 and 43, Tao in view of Jin discloses all features of claim(s) 2 and 41 as outlined above. Tao discloses wherein a number of the first one or more SMTCs in the first SMTC set is limited by a first upper bound ([0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}). Regarding claim(s) 5 and 44, Tao in view of Jin discloses all features of claim(s) 4 and 43 as outlined above. Tao discloses wherein a number of second one or more SMTCs in the second SMTC set is limited by a second upper bound ([0063]: the SMTC configuration for cell2 is SMTC #2 {Offset2, Period2, Duration2}). Regarding claim(s) 6 and 45, Tao in view of Jin discloses all features of claim(s) 1 and 40 as outlined above. Tao discloses wherein the measurement object configuration comprises a single SMTC set including the plurality of SMTCs, and wherein each of the plurality of SMTCs indicates a same periodicity ([0031]: The measurement configuration information includes more than one SSB-based RRM measurement timing configuration (SMTC) corresponding to a same measurement object. [0035]: different SMTCs are set for different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object, allowing the user equipment to measure different neighbor cells under the same carrier. [0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}, and the SMTC configuration for cell2 is SMTC #2 {Offset2, Period2, Duration2}... the values for Period1 and Period2 may be the same). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 19 and 46-48 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Applicant’s amendments, i.e., “wherein Y is less than X; indicating the number Y to the base station” (claim 19) filed 08/18/2026, in conjunction with other limitations, i.e., “wherein a total number of the plurality of SMTCs is X; determining a number Y of the plurality of SMTCs to use to perform one or more corresponding ones of the SSB measurements during a period” (claim 19) recited in the claim have overcome the previous rejection(s). An updated search has been performed and no prior art has been found that solely, or in any reasonable combination, reads on the claims as amended. The closest prior(s) art found is/are as follows: Tao et al. (US 2024/0406771 A1) (previously cited) teaches Fig. 3, [0031]: the network device 102 sends measurement configuration information to the user equipment. The measurement configuration information includes more than one SSB-based RRM measurement timing configuration (SMTC) corresponding to a same measurement object. [0032]: the user equipment 101 receives the measurement configuration information from the network device 102. [0033]: the user equipment 101 measures the neighbor cell to be measured corresponding to the measurement object according to the measurement configuration information. [0034]: the measurement object is the carrier corresponding to the cell. [0035]: different SMTCs are set for different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object, allowing the user equipment to measure different neighbor cells under the same carrier. Fig. 1, [0003]-[0004]: NTN includes cells 1-3. [0062]: in the SMTCs of different neighbor cells to be measured corresponding to the same measurement object in the measurement configuration information, the offset values are different, and the period values are the same. [0063]: The SMTC configuration for cell1 is SMTC #1 {Offset1, Period1, Duration1}, and the SMTC configuration for cell2 is SMTC #2 {Offset2, Period2, Duration2}. Here, Offset1 and Offset2 are different, and the values for Period1 and Period2 may be the same. Zhang et al. (US 2024/0260052 A1) teaches [0060]: the UE reports the capability to support simultaneous SMTC configurations; that is, the UE indicates a maximum number of SMTC configurations supported simultaneously, with different SMTC offsets (and that may further have different periodicities). The network configures and reconfigures through specific signaling messages, including Radio Resource Control (RRC), MAC control element (CE) and/or downlink control information (DCI) according to the UE capability and the estimated timing differences among serving and target cells. When the UE measures with multiple SMTC configurations, according to different UE capability/implementation, there can be scheduling restrictions on the SMTC occasions. This may avoid issues arising from large propagation delays between serving and neighbor cells for NTN UE measurements. [0065]: the number of supported SMTC configurations with different offsets may be indicated via UE capability signalling. Neither Tao nor Zhang, taken alone or in any reasonable combination, teach the claims as amended. Therefore claims 19 and 46-48 are allowed over the prior art of record. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THE HY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3813. The examiner can normally be reached on Mo-Fr: 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino, can be reached on (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THE HY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478 TheHy.Nguyen@USPTO.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2024
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 18, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12732327
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC PDCCH MONITORING GROUPS SWITCHING
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726952
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING TARGET RESOURCE TYPE, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719605
MAPPING SCHEMES FOR PARITY CODES WITH SHAPING
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707516
TRANSMITTING STATION AND RECEIVING STATION
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707392
LOW POWER WAKE-UP SIGNALING CAPABILITIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.3%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month