Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/699,900

MACHINE PICK, HOLDING DEVICE, EXCAVATION SYSTEM, AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 10, 2024
Priority
Oct 11, 2021 — DE 102021126279.8 +1 more
Examiner
KRECK, JANINE MUIR
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rockfeel GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1046 granted / 1339 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
63.9%
+23.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1339 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6 March 2026 has been entered. Claim 7 is allowable. The restriction requirement , as set forth in the Office action mailed on 11 October 2024 , has been reconsidered in view of the allowability of claims to the elected invention pursuant to MPEP § 821.04(a). The restriction requirement is hereby withdrawn as to any claim that requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. Claims 14,15,24,31 , directed to excavation system, are no longer withdrawn from consideration because the claim(s) requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. In view of the above noted withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant is advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once a restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 24 (as amended 10 April 2024) is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 24 recites the “signal processing device is configured to perform… excavating a material…” The original disclosure does not describe the signal processing device performing the excavating. Examiner suggests that the “excavation system” performs the recited method Claims 7-12, 14, 15, 21-23, and 25-32 allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Janine M KRECK whose telephone number is (571)272-7042. The examiner can normally be reached telework: M-F 0600-1530 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached at 5712725405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Janine M Kreck/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12618205
PAVEMENT GRINDING DRUM HAVING MODULAR BIT MOUNTINGS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611703
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DESALINATION AND SALT CONTROL OF LAKE OR RESERVOIR EMBANKMENT
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607121
STATIC CRUSHING DIRECTIONAL ANCHOR WITHDRAWAL METHOD AT END OF LARGE-MINING-HEIGHT WORKING FACE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12601259
REBUILDABLE HARD SURFACE CUTTING TIP FOR MINING BIT
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595734
CUTTING WHEEL FOR A CUTTING BORING MACHINE
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1339 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month