Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/700,280

OPERATING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Examiner
HSU, RYAN
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
347 granted / 613 resolved
-13.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§103
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 613 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-11 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1, the limitation in line 5-6, which recites “the plurality of node mechanism sections holding one ends of at least two or more link shafts among the plurality of link shafts” renders the claim unclear as to whether “one ends” renders the claim unclear as to whether the limitation recites a grammatical error that renders the scope of the claim unclear as to whether the limitation is directed to i) “one end” of the at least two or more link shafts; or ii) the group of one end of each of the two or more link shafts connected to the nodes. For purposes of Examination, the claim has been interpreted as “holding one end of at least two or more link shafts among the plurality of link shafts”. Regarding claim 2, the limitation in lines 2-3 which recite “a magnetic field that changes according to a direction in which each of the link shafts held” renders the claim unclear as to whether “a direction” is the same and/or different “direction” as detected by the first directions means recited by Claim 1 from which it depends. Regarding claim 3, the limitations in line 3-4 which recites “and each of the node mechanism sections is provided with a first magnetic sensor that detects a magnetic field generated from the first magnet, a second magnetic sensor that detects a magnetic field from the second magnet” which renders the claim unclear as to whether the “magnetic field” of the first magnet sensor and the second magnetic sensor are the same and/or different as the “magnetic field” detected by “a magnetic sensor” of the first detection means of claim 2 from which it depends. Regarding Claim 7, the claim is rendered indefinite because the limitations in line 3 recites “between the adjacent node mechanism sections adjacent to each other” and the term “the adjacent node mechanism sections adjacent to each other” lacks antecedent basis in the claim. Regarding claim 11, the limitation in lines 4-6 which recites “the held link shaft changes due to own weight of another” renders the claim unclear because it is unclear what “another” is referencing to set forth the metes and bounds of the claimed subject matter. Dependent claims 4-6 and 8-10 are rendered unclear for substantially the same reasons as independent Claim 1 above as being dependent and incorporating the limitations of independent Claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN HSU whose telephone number is (571)272-7148. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:00-6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at (571) 272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN HSU/EXAMINER, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12567302
INDEPENDENTLY RANDOMLY DETERMINED SYMBOL PATTERN SET ASSOCIATED WITH SYMBOL DISPLAY POSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567304
ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINE HAVING A TRANSMISSIVE DISPLAY DEVICE AND REELS THAT INCLUDE SYMBOLS WITH FILLABLE SUB-SYMBOLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12539468
AI STREAMER WITH FEEDBACK TO AI STREAMER BASED ON SPECTATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12542025
MULTIPLE INSTRUMENT SHEET MUSIC EMPLOYED FOR SYMBOL GENERATION AND DISPLAY IN GAMING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12515123
GAME CONTROLLER SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+18.5%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 613 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month