Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/700,630

STIR STICK FORMING ASSEMBLY FOR A STIR STICK DISPENSER IN A BEVERAGE VENDING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Examiner
NICHOLSON III, LESLIE AUGUST
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Evoca S P A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1167 granted / 1323 resolved
+36.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1345
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1323 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Interpretation 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. 3. This application includes one or more claim limitations that use the word “means” or “step” but are nonetheless not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph because the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure, materials, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “first motorized means”, “second motorized means”, “cam driving means”. The means are further structurally limited by “a single common electric motor” and “first and second one-way angular motion transmission assemblies”. The first motorized means is further structurally limited by “one of the first gear wheels and a second gear wheel” in claim 20. The second motorized means is further structurally limited by “cam driving means” in claim 21, “one said fist gear wheel and a third gear wheel” in claim 22. The “cam driving means” is further structurally limited by an eccentric cam and at least one arm in claim 23, and two of said radial lobes in claim 25. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are not being interpreted to cover only the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant intends to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to remove the structure, materials, or acts that performs the claimed function; or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) does/do not recite sufficient structure, materials, or acts to perform the claimed function. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 5. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 14 recites a first motorized means and a separate second motorized means; however, the Specification does not recite sufficient structure for each motorized means. The Specification discloses a single electric motor; however, each means cannot be comprised of the same structural element. Claim 14 recites “command and control means”; however, the Specification does not identify the structure that makes up the command and control means. 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 7. Claims 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites a first motorized means and a separate second motorized means; however, each means cannot be comprised of the same structural element. For the purposes of this Action, the first motorized means and the second motorized means will be interpreted to be a single common electric motor. Allowable Subject Matter 8. Claims 14-26 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Sirbu Villa (USP 11,904,488) discloses A stir stick forming assembly (1) for a stir stick dispenser of a beverage vending machine (1A); the stir stick forming assembly comprising: a mounting frame to allow the stir stick forming assembly to be mounted to a fixed body (fig.1); an inlet passage (8) for a tape (3); an outlet (7) opening for the stir sticks; a tape feeding member (13) to feed the tape to the outlet opening; a tape cutting member (6) to transversally cut the tape; a motorized means (16) to drive the tape feeding member and the tape cutting member; wherein the motorized driving means include a single common electric motor (16); and command and control means are provided to cause the single common electric motor to rotate to operate the tape feeding member and to operate the tape cutting member (electronic control unit disclosed in at least C5/L23-26). However, the prior art of record does not fairly disclose or suggest The command and control means are provided to cause the single common electric motor to rotate in one direction to operate the tape feeding member and in the opposite direction to operate the tape cutting member; wherein the first motorized means and the second motorized means are arranged symmetrically on opposite sides of a vertical laying plane where an axis of a rotating shaft of the single common electric motor lays; and a mechanical transmission to direct a torque delivered by the single common electric motor along two parallel branches and, for each of the two parallel branches, to a respective support shaft and including, for each support shaft, a respective motion inlet bevel gear idly rotatably mounted on the respective support shaft; wherein a first one of the support shafts is part of the first motorized means and a second one of the support shafts is part of the second motorized means; the first and second motorized means further include, respectively, first and second one-way angular motion transmission assemblies supported, respectively, by the first support shaft and by the second support shaft and configured to drive the tape feeding member when the single common electric motor is operated to rotate in one rotation direction and to drive the tape cutting member when the electric motor is operated to rotate in the opposite rotation direction. Conclusion 9. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESLIE A. NICHOLSON III whose telephone number is (571)272-5487. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael C McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LESLIE A NICHOLSON III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653 1/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600595
MACHINE FOR PRODUCING LAMINAR PRODUCTS MADE OF PAPER MATERIAL, IN PARTICULAR PACKAGES OF NAPKINS, TISSUES OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS AND RELATED PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595148
SHEET CONVEYING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589966
SHEET POSTPROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SHEET POSTPROCESSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592114
AUTOMATED SORTATION AND DISPENSING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583200
Method for forming a creasing on a paper item and paper item provided with a creasing
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month