Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/701,433

METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA USING A DATA PROCESSING NETWORK COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF DATA PROCESSING MODULES, DATA PROCESSING MODULE AND DATA PROCESSING NETWORK

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Priority
Oct 18, 2021 — DE 10 2021 211 731.7 +1 more
Examiner
KESSLER, GREGORY AARON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
729 granted / 837 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 837 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 18-34 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 32-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. As per claim 32, the claim language recites a “data processing module.” However, it appears that the system would reasonably be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as software, per se, failing to be tangibly embodied or include any recited hardware as part of the system. Software alone is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Applicant is advised to amend the claims to include a hardware element (i.e., a processor and/or memory) in order to overcome the 101 rejection. Claim 33 does not cure the deficiencies of the claim on which they depend. As per claim 34, the claim language recites a “data processing network.” However, it appears that the system would reasonably be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art as software, per se, failing to be tangibly embodied or include any recited hardware as part of the system. Software alone is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Applicant is advised to amend the claims to include a hardware element (i.e., a processor and/or memory) in order to overcome the 101 rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 18, 20, 21, and 32-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Standley et al (WO 2016/117639 A1, 26 November 2015, hereinafter Standley). Standley was cited in the IDS filed on 04/16/2024. As per claim 18, Standley teaches the limitations as claimed, including a method for processing data using a data processing network including a plurality of data processing modules, which each include at least one data processing component, wherein each data processing component is configured for a defined data processing task for processing the data (Paragraph [0051]), wherein each data processing module receives, as input data, data from at least one data source and/or output data from further data processing modules and generates output data which are network output data of the data processing network and/or input data of further data processing modules (Figure 5D), wherein the following steps are carried out in the method for at least one data processing module: a) receiving at least one set of input data for performing the data processing task in the at least one data processing component of the data processing module (Figure 1B, input signals); b) receiving a stimulus for activating the at least one data processing component of the data processing module and assigning a pipeline stage of the at least one data processing component (Paragraphs [0056], [0063], [0064], [0138]); c) when the set of input data has been received in step a) and the stimulus has been received in step b): activating the pipeline stage of the at least one data processing component of the data processing module and performing the data processing task for which the data processing component is configured with the set of input data to generate output data (Figure 1B); and d) providing the output data for further data processing and/or as network output data (Figure 1B, outputs). As per claim 20, Standley teaches at least one timer is used to generate the stimulus used in step b), the timer specifing a time pattern for regular repetition of the execution of the data processing task with the data processing component (Paragraph [0345]). As per claim 21, Standley teaches that at least one availability signal that indicates availability of data is used to generate the stimulus used in step b) (Paragraph [0067]). As per claims 32, it is a module claim with no further limitations beyond those rejected above. Therefore, it is rejected for the same reasons. As per claim 33, Standley teaches that at least the input memory or the output memory has a plurality of stages for storing the set of input data or the output data (Figure 1B). As per claim 34, it is a network claim with no further limitations beyond those rejected above. Therefore, it is rejected for the same reasons. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 19 and 22-31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gregory Kessler whose telephone number is (571)270-7762. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30 - 5, Alternate Fridays 8:30-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bradley Teets can be reached at (571)272-3338. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY A KESSLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2197
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737234
DYNAMIC AND PERSISTENT DATA SHARING FOR CLOUD SERVICE PIPELINES
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737219
OPTIMIZING JOB PREEMPTION USING DYNAMIC AND STATIC INFORMATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737232
Multi-armed bandit improvement
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724635
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING ANDROID SYSTEM DRAWING THREAD, AND MOBILE TERMINAL AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717639
STACKING STACK TECHNIQUE FOR OPERATING SYSTEM KERNELS TO SUPPORT PRIORITIZED AND PREMPTIBLE TASKLETS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.0%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 837 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month