Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/701,648

SERVICE CONTROL SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Priority
Nov 18, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021042426
Examiner
WOO, ANDREW M
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
474 granted / 573 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
585
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
79.6%
+39.6% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 573 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response the amendments filed 10/29/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because Applicant’s claimed invention falls under the “Mental Processes” subject matter grouping of abstract ideas in the 2019 Revised Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance, 84 Fed. Reg. 50 (Dep’t of Commerce Jan. 07, 2019) (“2019 PEG”). As per claim 1, the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea based on concepts that, but for the recitation of generic computer components (i.e., “at least one memory storing instructions; and at least one processor”), the steps of the invention (i.e., see claim 1, “decide whether to switch a server…” ; “decide a server of a switching destination…”; see claim 3, “evaluate the allowable delay satisfaction…”, see claim 6, “predict the delay time…”) could otherwise be performed in the human mind. Moreover, the use of generic computer components (i.e., “at least one memory storing instructions; and at least one processor”) do not add a practical application or significantly more to the judicial exception (see MPEP §2106.05(f)). Claims 4-5, do provide a little more structure, i.e., “…wherein the plurality of servers are hierarchized into a plurality of layers, each of which comprising one or more servers and each of which having a management area whose size is different from each other…”, however, the recited structure simply serves to limit the data/information used for selection/evaluation (e.g., “…select one of the plurality of layers sequentially from a layer side with a narrow management area”). Thus, similar to Electric Power Group, the structure/arrangement of the plurality of servers merely serves to indicate either a field of use or technological environment in which to apply the judicial exception, which does not amount to significantly more than the exception itself, and cannot integrate a judicial exception into a practical application (see MPEP §2106.05(h), alternatively, see also MPEP §2106.05(g), with respect to insignificant extra-solution activity, e.g., “Selecting a particular data source or type of data to be manipulated”). Claims 7 and 13 are rejected under the same rationale as claim 1, as the claim recites a slight variation of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW WOO whose telephone number is (571)270-7521. The examiner can normally be reached Telework 9:00AM-6:00PM | IFP M-F 9:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wing Chan can be reached on 5712727493. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW WOO/Examiner, Art Unit 2441 /WING F CHAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2441
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Oct 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634348
PLATFORM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED DEVICE MANAGEMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICING
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621218
AUTOMATED DEVICE OS AND APPLICATION MANAGEMENT AT THE EDGE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615203
MULTIPATH WEIGHTING USING METRICS FROM ONE OR MORE PROTOCOLS
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603923
CAPABILITY SIGNALING
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592863
DIGITAL NETWORK SIMULATION AND GRAPH DATABASE FORMULATION FOR USE WITH A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+45.0%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 573 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month