Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/701,714

DRIVING DEVICE AND SPINNING TOP ACCELERATOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Examiner
NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Guangzhou Lingdong Creative Culture Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
963 granted / 1324 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1324 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Status of Claims In preliminary amendment filed 4/16/2024, Applicant amended the abstract and amended claims 1-3, 5, and 10. This amendment is acknowledged. Claims 1-10 are pending and are currently being examined. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/16/2024 was filed before the mailing date of the first office action on the merits. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “A driving device” should read “A driving device for a spinning top accelerator” to more clearly define the invention and differentiate from generic gear driving devices. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “both sides” in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Additionally, it is unclear what the limitation “both sides” is exactly defining as no sides are defined and no shape is defined for the gravity block. Claim 5 recites the limitation “the other side” in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation “the other side” in line 2, “both sides of the gravity block” in line 3, and “both sides of the case” in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Additionally, it is unclear what the limitation “both sides” is exactly defining as no sides are defined and no shape is defined for the gravity block and for the case. Therefore claims 2-4, 6-8, and 10 are rejected as they depend from a rejected claim. Potentially Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the objections and rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: in addition to the other claim limitations, the specific limitations of a driving device for a spinning top accelerator comprising:…both sides of the gravity block are provided with a first driving rack and a second driving rack opposite to each other; the acceleration gear set includes a first active gear, a first clutch gear, a second active gear, a second clutch gear and a driving gear, the second active gear and the second clutch gear are respectively arranged symmetrically with the fist active gear and the first clutch gear with respect to the driving gear, the first active gear meshes between the first driving rack and the first clutch gear, and the second active gear meshes between the second driving rack and the second clutch gear, the gravity block is able to slide back and forth between a first end and a second end, when the gravity block slides to the first end, the first clutch gear meshes with the driving gear, and when the gravity block slides away from the first end, the first clutch gear and the driving gear do not contact each other; when the gravity block slides to the second end, the second clutch gear meshes with the driving gear, and when the gravity block slides away from the second end, the second clutch gear and the driving gear do not contact each other are not anticipated by or found obvious by the cited prior art. Brief Discussion of Other Prior Art References The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See the references cited page for publications that are noted for containing similar subject matter as the applicant. For example, Xie (10,641,579), Huang (CN114832396), Zhang (CN 216456875), Wang (CN 215505465), Li (CN 211912704), Ming (CN 209997181), Choi (9,180,379), Horikoshi (8,715,032), Ujita (2011/0177750), Moomaw (4,867,728), and Gandy (2,375,986) teach similar gear driven driving devices for spinning top accelerators. Conclusion If the applicant or applicant’s representation has any questions or concerns regarding this office action or the application they are welcome to contact the examiner at the phone number listed below and schedule and interview to discuss the outstanding issues and possible amendments to expedite prosecution of this application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER R NICONOVICH whose telephone number is (571)270-7419. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Weiss can be reached at (571) 270-1775. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER R NICONOVICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599845
Piñata Structure and Method for Assembling Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589321
Hand Operated Gyroscope Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589325
TOY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12566044
CROSSBOW DE-COCKER AND RELATED METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558635
Toy
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+21.1%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1324 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month