Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/702,089

CVD SINGLE CRYSTAL DIAMOND

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 17, 2024
Priority
Oct 19, 2021 — GB 2114934.9 +1 more
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Element Six Technologies Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
732 granted / 1656 resolved
-20.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
75 currently pending
Career history
1752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1656 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of a CVD single crystal diamond (claims 1-4 and 6-12) in the reply filed on June 15, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 7, 9, and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Twitchen (WO 2010/149775, of record). Twitchen is directed to a CVD single crystal diamond having the following characteristics: NS0 is preferably less than 5 ppm (Table 5 on Page 33) and (NV0+NV-)/NS0 > 0.16 (Table 5 on Page 34) Regarding claim 3, Twitchen teaches a hue angle between 0 and 60 degrees (Table 6 on Page 36). As to claim 7, Twitchen teaches chroma values between 2 and 20 (Table 6). With respect to claim 9, Twitchen describes a 0.5 round brilliant cut diamond having a fancy pale pink grade (Page 36, Lines 1+). Regarding claim 11, Twitchen describes the presence of H3 centres (Table 2A on Page 22). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Twitchen. With respect to claims 2 and 6, a fair reading of Twitchen suggests the general manufacture of fancy colored diamonds via an irradiating and annealing method. Twitchen further states that the disclosed method provides diamond material in general, including that suitable for use in spintronic applications (Page 1, Lines 5+) and ornamental applications such as gemstones for jewelry (Page 39, Lines 30+). A fair reading of Twitchen suggests the general manufacture of fancy colored diamonds without limitation in regards to a linear dimension or a total volume. One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use any number of linear dimensions and/or total volumes that are consistent with those that are commonly used with diamonds, including the broad range of dimensions and volumes required by the claimed invention. Regarding claim 4, as detailed above, Twitchen is directed to a CVD single crystal diamond. While Twitchen fails to specifically disclose silicon vacancies (SV), the reference does state that an inventive concept focuses on maximizing production of NV centres, while minimizing other undesirable defects (Page 5, Lines 22+). One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the language of Twitchen as encompassing a CVD single crystal diamond having little or no silicon vacancies and such is seen to correspond with the claimed Si-V luminescence (e.g. zero silicon vacancies would result in a luminescence of 0 as defined by the claims). With respect to claim 8, Twitchen teaches T2 values (observed or effective time) that are preferably greater than 800 µs (Page 40, Lines 19+). It is well recognized that T2* (dephasing time) is always shorter than T2. Thus, given preferred T2 values greater than 800 µs, it reasons that T2* would be at least 5 µs. Regarding claim 10, given that the diamond material of Twitchen has applicability as gemstones for jewelry, it reasons that Twitchen would encompass the wide variety of conventional clarities required by the claimed invention. It is emphasized that the claims simply exclude diamonds that are included or slightly included, while including all diamonds that are flawless, internally flawless, very very slightly included, and very slightly included. As to claim 12, Twitchen states that NV- + NV0 is most preferably at least 0.5 times N0S (Page 34). Additionally, Twitchen states that at least one or more of the characteristics set out in Table 2A is present, such as H3 defects. This suggests that H3 defects can actually be zero or approach zero and given that NV- + NV0 is most preferably at least 0.5 times N0S, it reasons that Twitchen encompasses CVBD diamond material having a large ratio as required by the claimed invention (large value for NV- + NV0 and small value for H3). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 July 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691709
A SELF-SUPPORTING TYRE FOR AUTOMOTIVE WHEELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679144
HEAVY DUTY TIRE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668691
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654496
Run Flat System Having a Spring Suspension
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643349
PNEUMATIC TIRE
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+2.3%)
3y 4m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1656 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month