Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/702,440

NOISE, VIBRATION AND HARSHNESS TEST FOR AN ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATOR SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Priority
Oct 18, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2021078802
Examiner
RAEVIS, ROBERT R
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1590 granted / 1908 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1946
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1908 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-18,20-29 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claim 30, it’s unclear how “medium” comprises steps. Base claim 28 includes steps, and so must all claims that depend upon claim 28. Yet, a medium does not include steps. Use of the term “when” (line 3) cannot serve to do otherwise. Note that practitioners often claim program claims as being configured to carry out steps of a method. Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.] 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. As to claim 30, as the claim is directed to a “computer readable medium”, the claim effectively removes all of the steps of claim 28. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. As to REMARKS, consider: As claim 30, the claim is still directed to an article. The medium does not include steps. The medium may have instructions, but the medium does not include steps. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT R RAEVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2204. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon to Fri from 8am to 4pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina DeHerrera, can be reached at telephone number 303-297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /ROBERT R RAEVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680925
PNEUMATIC NEBULIZATION-PHOTOCHEMICAL VAPOR GENERATION DUAL MODE SAMPLE INTRODUCTION SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680937
CAPTURE VESSEL CARTRIDGE FOR PERMEATION TESTING OF PREFILLED PACKAGES AND CONTAINERS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680859
DETERMINING A ZERO-VERIFICATION CRITERIA FOR A ZERO VERIFICATION OF A VIBRATORY METER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674723
SENSOR ELEMENT AND GAS SENSOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669415
ODOR MEASUREMENT DEVICE, CONTROL DEVICE, AND ODOR DETERMINATION METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1908 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month