Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/702,723

NETWORK-CONTROLLED REPEATER DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED CONTROL SIGNALLING

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2021 — SE 2151396-5 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, LIEM HONG
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
178 granted / 244 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 244 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This communication is in response to applicant's response filed under 37 C.F.R. §1.111, dated June 26, 2026, in response to a non-final office action. Claims 1, 14, 34, and 50 have been amended. Claims 1-18, 34, and 50 are subject to examination and have been examined. Acknowledgement is made to the following amendments made by the Applicant: Applicant's amendment to claims 1 and 14 to obviate the previous rejection to claims 1-18 in regard to 35 U.S.C 112(b) indefiniteness. The previous rejection to the said claims is hereby withdrawn. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4-5, 13-16, 34, and 50 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et.al. (US Patent Application Publication, 20200366363, hereinafter, “Li”). Regarding claim 1, Li teaches: A method of operating a base station serving a cell of a cellular network, the method comprising (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management … [0045] … Additionally, or alternatively, the mmW repeater 140 may be a wireless transmit receive point (TRP) acting as a distributed unit (e.g., of a 5G access node) that communicates wirelessly with a base station 110 acting as a central unit or an access node controller (e.g., of the 5G access node) ... Fig. 7): - transmitting, to a wireless communication device, control data of a forward-facing control link provided by one or more network-configured repeater devices in the cell to wireless communication devices, the one or more network-configured repeater devices providing a repeater-mediated connectivity to the wireless communication devices in the cell, the forward-facing control link supporting the repeater-mediated connectivity (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management. As shown, the resource set may include a first set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to receive one or more reference signals from a first node (e.g., the base station 110 in example 700) and a second set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to relay the one or more reference signals to a second node (e.g., a UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., via forward-facing control link] … [0097] As shown by reference number 720, the base station 110 may identify a first beam pair and a second beam pair based at least in part on transmitting the configuration … As shown by reference number 730, the second beam pair may be between the millimeter wave repeater 140 and the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., forward-facing control link] … [0099] ... In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit (e.g., via the repeater 140) an instruction for the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) to perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more downlink reference signals ... Fig. 7), wherein the control data enables the wireless communication device to monitor the forward-facing control link provided by the one or more network-configured repeater devices (Li: [0099] The UE 120 may receive one or more relayed downlink reference signals from the repeater 140 and may perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more relayed downlink reference signals according to the configuration [i.e., control data] … the UE 120 may perform measurement and reporting for the reference signal(s) based at least in part on the instruction (e.g., which may include a reporting configuration). In some aspects, the instruction may be included in the configuration, which may be relayed by the repeater 140 to the UE 120. Fig. 7). Regarding claim 4, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li further teaches: wherein the control data is indicative of resources allocated to at least one of repeater reference signals transmitted by the one or more network-configured repeater devices on the control link (Li: [0099] The UE 120 may receive one or more relayed downlink reference signals from the repeater 140 and may perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more relayed downlink reference signals according to the configuration ...). Regarding claim 5, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li further teaches: wherein the control data is indicative of a type or configuration of repeater reference signals transmitted by the one or more network-configured repeater devices on the control link (Li: [0100] In some aspects, the instruction may indicate a set of resources to be monitored by the UE 120 for the reference signals. For example, the set of resources may be the second set of resources (e.g., the time resources, frequency resources, and/or beams used by the repeater 140 to relay the reference signals) …). Regarding claim 13, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li further teaches: wherein the control link is shared between multiple network-configured repeater devices, wherein the method further comprises: co-scheduling transmissions of the multiple network-configured repeater devices on the control link (Li: 0112] In some aspects, the UE 120 may transmit the one or more uplink reference signals based at least in part on an instruction received from the base station 110 (e.g., via the repeater 140) according to the configuration. For example, the base station 110 may transmit an instruction for the first node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 800) to transmit the one or more uplink reference signals. In some aspects, the instruction may be included in the configuration, which may be relayed by the repeater 140 to the UE 120. In some aspects, the instruction may indicate a set of resources to be used by the UE 120 to transmit the reference signals. For example, the set of resources may be the first set of resources (e.g., the time resources, frequency resources, and/or beams used by the repeater 140 to receive the reference signals). Although uplink reference signals are used as an example, if the first node is a first base station 110 and the second node is a second base station 110, then downlink reference signals may be used (e.g., SSBs, CSI-RSs, and/or the like). Additionally, or alternatively, a wideband beacon may be used (e.g., if multiple repeaters 140 are used as intermediaries between the nodes).). Regarding claim 14, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li further teaches: receiving, from the wireless communication device, a report message indicative of device-specific repeater information of at least one network-configured repeater device of the one or more network-configured repeater devices, to thereby facilitate providing a configuration to the at least one network-configured repeater device (Li: [0099] The UE 120 may receive one or more relayed downlink reference signals from the repeater 140 and may perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more relayed downlink reference signals according to the configuration. In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit (e.g., via the repeater 140) an instruction for the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) to perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more downlink reference signals. In this case, the UE 120 may perform measurement and reporting for the reference signal(s) based at least in part on the instruction (e.g., which may include a reporting configuration). In some aspects, the instruction may be included in the configuration, which may be relayed by the repeater 140 to the UE 120.). Regarding claim 15, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 14 as outlined above. Li further teaches: providing the configuration to the at least one network-configured repeater device based on the device-specific repeater information (Li: [0115] … In some aspects, the base station 110 may receive a report of the measurements (e.g., a measurement report described herein) from the second node. For example, the base station 110 may configure the second node to transmit a measurement report to the base station 110 (e.g., using a reporting configuration). The base station 110 may identify the first beam pair and the second beam pair based at least in part on the measurement report. In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit an indication of the first beam pair and/or the second beam pair to the first node, the second node, and/or the repeater 140 to assist with beam management.). Regarding claim 16, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 14 as outlined above. Li further teaches: wherein the configuration comprises at least one of adjusting one or more spatial filters of the at least one network-configured repeater device (Li: [0115] … In some aspects, the base station 110 may receive a report of the measurements (e.g., a measurement report described herein) from the second node. For example, the base station 110 may configure the second node to transmit a measurement report to the base station 110 (e.g., using a reporting configuration). The base station 110 may identify the first beam pair and the second beam pair based at least in part on the measurement report. In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit an indication of the first beam pair and/or the second beam pair [i.e., spatial filters] to … the repeater 140 to assist with beam management.). Regarding claim 34, Li teaches: A method of operating a wireless communication device connectable to a cellular network, the method comprising (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management. As shown, the resource set may include a first set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to receive one or more reference signals from a first node (e.g., the base station 110 in example 700) and a second set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to relay the one or more reference signals to a second node (e.g., a UE 120 in example 700) … [0045] … In some aspects, a millimeter wave (mmW) repeater 140 may receive a millimeter wave signal (e.g., an analog millimeter wave signal) from a base station 110, may amplify the millimeter wave signal, and may transmit the amplified millimeter wave signal to one or more UEs 120 (e.g., shown as UE 120f). In some aspects, the mmW repeater 140 may be an analog mmW repeater, sometimes also referred to as a layer 1 mmW repeater. Additionally, or alternatively, the mmW repeater 140 may be a wireless transmit receive point (TRP) acting as a distributed unit (e.g., of a 5G access node) that communicates wirelessly with a base station 110 acting as a central unit or an access node controller (e.g., of the 5G access node) ... Fig. 7): - receiving control data of a forward-facing control link provided by one or more network-configured repeater devices in a cell of the cellular network, the one or more network-configured repeater devices providing a repeater-mediated connectivity to wireless communication devices in the cell, the forward-facing control link supporting the repeater-mediated connectivity (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management. As shown, the resource set may include a first set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to receive one or more reference signals from a first node (e.g., the base station 110 in example 700) and a second set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to relay the one or more reference signals to a second node (e.g., a UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., via forward-facing control link] … [0097] As shown by reference number 720, the base station 110 may identify a first beam pair and a second beam pair based at least in part on transmitting the configuration … As shown by reference number 730, the second beam pair may be between the millimeter wave repeater 140 and the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., forward-facing control link] … [0099] ... In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit (e.g., via the repeater 140) an instruction for the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) to perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more downlink reference signals ... Fig. 7); and - monitoring the forward-facing control link based on the control data (Li: [0099] The UE 120 may receive one or more relayed downlink reference signals from the repeater 140 and may perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more relayed downlink reference signals according to the configuration [i.e., control data] … the UE 120 may perform measurement and reporting for the reference signal(s) based at least in part on the instruction (e.g., which may include a reporting configuration). In some aspects, the instruction may be included in the configuration, which may be relayed by the repeater 140 to the UE 120. Fig. 7). Regarding claim 50, Li teaches: A method of operating a network-configured repeater device in a cell of a cellular network served by a base station of the cellular network, the method comprising (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management … [0045] … Additionally, or alternatively, the mmW repeater 140 may be a wireless transmit receive point (TRP) acting as a distributed unit (e.g., of a 5G access node) that communicates wirelessly with a base station 110 acting as a central unit or an access node controller (e.g., of the 5G access node) ... Fig. 7): - obtaining, from the base station, a configuration to provide a forward-facing control link (Li: [0097] As shown by reference number 720, the base station 110 may identify a first beam pair and a second beam pair based at least in part on transmitting the configuration … As shown by reference number 730, the second beam pair may be between the millimeter wave repeater 140 and the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., forward-facing control link] ... Fig. 7), and - providing, in accordance with the configuration, the forward-facing control link to one or more wireless communication devices in the cell to support a repeater-mediated connectivity between the one or more wireless communication devices and the base station connectivity (Li: [0092] As shown by reference number 705, a base station 110 may transmit a configuration that indicates a resource set to be used by a millimeter wave repeater 140 for beam management. As shown, the resource set may include a first set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to receive one or more reference signals from a first node (e.g., the base station 110 in example 700) and a second set of resources to be used by the millimeter wave repeater 140 to relay the one or more reference signals to a second node (e.g., a UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., via forward-facing control link] … [0097] As shown by reference number 720, the base station 110 may identify a first beam pair and a second beam pair based at least in part on transmitting the configuration … As shown by reference number 730, the second beam pair may be between the millimeter wave repeater 140 and the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) [i.e., forward-facing control link] … [0099] ... In some aspects, the base station 110 may transmit (e.g., via the repeater 140) an instruction for the second node (e.g., the UE 120 in example 700) to perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more downlink reference signals ... Fig. 7), the forward-facing control link enabling the one or more wireless communication devices to monitor the forward-facing control link (Li: [0099] The UE 120 may receive one or more relayed downlink reference signals from the repeater 140 and may perform measurement and/or reporting of the one or more relayed downlink reference signals according to the configuration … the UE 120 may perform measurement and reporting for the reference signal(s) based at least in part on the instruction (e.g., which may include a reporting configuration). In some aspects, the instruction may be included in the configuration, which may be relayed by the repeater 140 to the UE 120. Fig. 7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3, 6-7 and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li in view of Abedini et.al. (US Patent Application Publication, 20220053486, hereinafter, “Abedini”). Regarding claim 2, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: wherein the control data is indicative of resources allocated to the control link. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: wherein the control data is indicative of resources allocated to the control link (Abedini: [0227] At block 2010, the repeater device may obtain a time domain resource allocation from the control information. The time domain resource allocation information may include, for example, at least one of: a slot location, and a symbol location of the traffic …). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Regarding claim 3, Li-Abedini discloses on the features with respect to claim 2 as outlined above. Abedini further teaches: wherein the resources are at least one of time-frequency resources of a time-frequency resource grid of a carrier of the cell (Abedini: [0067] The resource grid 304 may be used to schematically represent time-frequency resources for a given antenna port. That is, in a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) implementation with multiple antenna ports available, a corresponding multiple number of resource grids 304 may be available for communication. The resource grid 304 is divided into multiple resource elements (REs) 306. An RE, which is 1 subcarrier×1 symbol, is the smallest discrete part of the time-frequency grid, and contains a single complex value representing data from a physical channel or signal). The rationale and motivation for adding this teaching of Abedini is the same as the rationale and motivation for Claim 2. Regarding claim 6, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: wherein the control data comprises information associated with an identity of each one of the one or more network-configured repeater devices and used by the respective one of the one or more network-configured repeater devices for communicating on the control link. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: wherein the control data comprises information associated with an identity of each one of the one or more network-configured repeater devices and used by the respective one of the one or more network-configured repeater devices for communicating on the control link (Abedini: [0181] According to one aspect, the DCI may be transmitted with a masked cyclic redundancy check (CRC). The CRC may be masked with an arithmetic value (e.g., a number) that uniquely identifies the repeater device and associates the repeater device with traffic to be relayed through the repeater device between a base station and a user equipment (UE). According to some aspects the number may be a radio network temporary identifier (RNTI). In more detail, the RNTI may be designated as a relay unit (RU)-RNTI. The repeater device may recognize its own DCI by use of the masked CRC and knowledge of its own RNTI (e.g., its own RU-RNTI). According to some aspects, the repeater device may identify a DCI (e.g., a DCI carrying control information) by demasking (descrambling) a CRC of the DCI with an RNTI (of the repeater device) …). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Regarding claim 7, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: wherein the control data is transmitted upon a request by the wireless communication device for the control data. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: wherein the control data is transmitted upon a request by the wireless communication device for the control data (Abedini: [0078] In an UL transmission, the scheduled entity may utilize one or more REs 306 to carry UL control information (UCI) including one or more UL control channels, such as a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), to the scheduling entity. UCI may include a variety of packet types and categories, including pilots, reference signals, and information configured to enable or assist in decoding uplink data transmissions. Examples of uplink reference signals may include a sounding references signal (SRS) and an uplink DMRS. In some examples, the UCI may include a scheduling request (SR), i.e., a request for the scheduling entity to schedule uplink transmissions …). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Regarding claim 10, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: synchronizing scheduling of a first transmission of data communicated between the base station and the wireless communication device and of a second transmission on the control link. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: synchronizing scheduling of a first transmission of data communicated between the base station and the wireless communication device and of a second transmission on the control link (Abedini: [0047] As illustrated in FIG. 1, a scheduling entity 108 may broadcast downlink traffic 112 to one or more scheduled entities (e.g., one or more UE 106). Broadly, the scheduling entity 108 is a node or device responsible for scheduling traffic in a wireless communication network, including the downlink traffic 112 and, in some examples, uplink traffic 116 from one or more scheduled entities (e.g., one or more UE 106) to the scheduling entity 108. On the other hand, the scheduled entity (e.g., one or more UE 106) may be a node or device that receives downlink control 114 (e.g., downlink control information), including but not limited to scheduling information (e.g., a grant), synchronization or timing information, or other control information from another entity in the wireless communication network such as the scheduling entity 108 …). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Regarding claim 11, Li-Abedini discloses on the features with respect to claim 10 as outlined above. Abedini further teaches: wherein said synchronizing comprises defining time gaps during which the first transmission is paused, to thereby facilitate monitoring of the control link by the wireless communication device during the time gaps (Abedini: [0083] Prior to conveying data in a plurality of PDSCH repetitions, for example, a gNB may convey TDRA information to the wireless communication device. The TDRA information may be conveyed in downlink control information (DCI) within a PDCCH. The TDRA information defines, among other things, where a wireless communication device should expect to locate, in a slot, valid TDRA candidate occasions in the time domain. In some examples, only a first TDRA for a PDSCH first repetition is indicated to a wireless communication device by a gNB. The wireless communication device may reuse the first TDRA for a PDSCH second repetition by shifting the first TDRA by a fixed time gap.). The rationale and motivation for adding this teaching of Abedini is the same as the rationale and motivation for Claim 10. Regarding claim 12, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: providing a configuration to the one or more network-configured repeater devices to provide the control link in accordance with the control data. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: providing a configuration to the one or more network-configured repeater devices to provide the control link in accordance with the control data (Abedini: [0219] FIG. 20 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process 2000 (e.g., a method) at a wireless repeater device controlled by a base station for receiving control signaling comprising control information and configuring a relay unit of the repeater device according to the control information in accordance with some aspects of the disclosure. The repeater device may relay traffic (e.g., user data, user signaling) and/or control (e.g., control information, control messaging) ... Figs. 2, 19A/B/C, 20). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li-Abedini in view of Keskitalo et.al. (US Patent Application Publication, 20210176670, hereinafter, “Keskitalo”). Regarding claim 8, Li-Abedini discloses on the features with respect to claim 7 as outlined above. Li-Abedini does not explicitly teach: wherein the request is associated with an information element that is indicative of the one or more network-configured repeater devices being present in the cell, the information element being transmitted by the base station. However, in the same field of endeavor, Keskitalo teaches: wherein the request is associated with an information element that is indicative of the one or more network-configured repeater devices being present in the cell, the information element being transmitted by the base station (Keskitalo: [0062] Therefore, according to an example implementation, a RN-UE part 332 may receive a CSI-RS configuration and on-demand reference signals (e.g., CSI-RS signals), from a candidate BS/candidate cell 320 during a monitoring phase and before a handover phase for the UE (e.g., before the candidate BS has sent a handover request/acknowledgement and/or before the UE has received a handover command from the serving BS with respect to the candidate BS/cell). For example, RN 330 (e.g., RN-BS part 334) may send, via Xn connection with candidate BS 320, a request for transmission of reference signals (e.g., a request for UE-specific CSI-RS signals and a request for an associated reference signal configuration) ... Fig. 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li-Abedini to include the features as taught by Keskitalo above in order to reduce use and/or reservation of radio resources. (Keskitalo, ¶ [0086]). Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li in view of Keskitalo et.al. (US Patent Application Publication, 20210176670, hereinafter, “Keskitalo”). Regarding claim 9, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 1 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: wherein the control data is transmitted in response to a coverage scenario of the wireless communication device or the one or more network-configured repeater devices fulfilling a predefined criterion. However, in the same field of endeavor, Keskitalo teaches: wherein the control data is transmitted in response to a coverage scenario of the wireless communication device (Keskitalo: [0062] Therefore, according to an example implementation, a RN-UE part 332 may receive a CSI-RS configuration and on-demand reference signals (e.g., CSI-RS signals), from a candidate BS/candidate cell 320 during a monitoring phase and before a handover phase for the UE (e.g., before the candidate BS has sent a handover request/acknowledgement and/or before the UE has received a handover command from the serving BS with respect to the candidate BS/cell). For example, RN 330 (e.g., RN-BS part 334) may send, via Xn connection with candidate BS 320, a request for transmission of reference signals (e.g., a request for UE-specific CSI-RS signals and a request for an associated reference signal configuration) ... Fig. 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Keskitalo above in order to reduce use and/or reservation of radio resources. (Keskitalo, ¶ [0086]). Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li in view of Mcmenamy et.al. (US Patent Application Publication, 20240187085, hereinafter, “Mcmenamy”). Regarding claim 17, Li discloses on the features with respect to claim 14 as outlined above. Li does not explicitly teach: wherein the configuration comprises activating or deactivating or configuring a transmission of at least one type of repeater reference signals on the control link, wherein said configuring of the transmission of the at least one type of repeater reference signals comprises at least one of setting a frequency hopping pattern, setting a frequency range, setting a timing pattern, or setting a spatial filter for the transmission of the at least one type of repeater reference signals. However, in the same field of endeavor, Mcmenamy teaches: wherein the configuration comprises deactivating a transmission of at least one type of repeater reference signals on the control link (Mcmenamy: [0231] A Type 2A repeater may, based on the reception of a control signal, e.g., via a control channel, [0232] mute transmission of reference signals during specific time-slots/symbols on the access link ...), wherein said configuring of the transmission of the at least one type of repeater reference signals comprises at least one of setting a timing pattern for the transmission of the at least one type of repeater reference signals (Mcmenamy: [0231] A Type 2A repeater may, based on the reception of a control signal, e.g., via a control channel … [0233] change the time pattern of reference signal on the DL). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li to include the features as taught by Mcmenamy above in order to distinguish repeater-based path components from others. (Mcmenamy, ¶ [0230]). Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li-Mcmenamy in view of Abedini. Regarding claim 18, Li-Mcmenamy discloses on the features with respect to claim 17 as outlined above. Li-Mcmenamy does not explicitly teach: wherein the at least one type of repeater reference signals corresponds to demodulation repeater reference signals. However, in the same field of endeavor, Abedini teaches: wherein the at least one type of repeater reference signals corresponds to demodulation repeater reference signals (Abedini: [0075] The base station may further allocate one or more REs 306 (e.g., in the control region 314 or the data region 316) to carry other DL signals, such as a demodulation reference signal (DMRS) …). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Li-Mcmenamy to include the features as taught by Abedini above in order to remotely control the repeater device to reduce cost and complexity. (Abedini, ¶ [0038]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIEM H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (408) 918-7636. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, 8:00AM-4:30PM PT. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Noel Beharry can be reached on (571) 270-5630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIEM H. NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 26, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750722
TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY TRANSMISSION FOR WIRELESS TIME SENSITIVE NETWORKS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750689
DYNAMIC EXTENSION OF A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745232
SENSING DESIGN FOR USER EQUIPMENT (UE)
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727041
CROSS-LINK INTERFERENCE (CLI) MEASUREMENT BASED SIDELINK ESTABLISHMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726850
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC DRIVING, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+23.5%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 244 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month