Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/702,942

METHOD FOR MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF A FUEL-AIR MIXTURE OF A SYSTEM, AND AN ASSOCIATED SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Oct 20, 2021 — DE 10 2021 127 223.8 +1 more
Examiner
PEREIRO, JORGE ANDRES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ebm-Papst Landshut GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
635 granted / 992 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1013
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
88.0%
+48.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Claim 8 is interpreted as an independent Claim which incorporates the limitations of Independent Claim 1 in a shorthand fashion. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 8-10 mix statutory classes in a single claim which is impermissible because it creates ambiguity regarding when direct infringement occurs. Claims 8-10 mix structural system elements (e.g., a mixer, an actuator and a pressure differential sensor) and method steps (e.g., a method for controlling a fuel-air mixture as recited in independent Claim 1) are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). Under established Federal Circuit precedent—primarily IPXL Holdings v. Amazon.com—claims that cover both an apparatus (system) and a method of use of that apparatus are invalid. This is because it is unclear if infringement occurs when a manufacturer builds the claimed system or when an end-user actually operates the mixer, actuator and a pressure differential sensor to control the air/fuel ratio. Also, since the claim mixes the act of controlling with the apparatus that allows the controlling. Therefore, the claims are indefinite. See also MPEP § 2173.05(p)(II): “A single claim which claims both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 are allowed. Claims 8-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because the references are either in the same field of endeavor or are reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the applicant was concerned. Please see form PTO-892 (Notice of References Cited) attached to, or included with, this Office Action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JORGE A PEREIRO whose telephone number is (571)270-3932 and whose fax number is (571) 270-4932. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9:00 - 5:00 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helena Kosanovic can be reached at (571) 272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JORGE A PEREIRO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680700
HOB WITH CENTRAL DOWNWARD REMOVAL OF COOKING VAPORS THROUGH SUCTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680701
EXTRACTING DEVICE FOR REMOVING AIR, COMBINATION APPLIANCE AND SUCTION ARM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674577
Systems and Methods for Fuel Selection for Combustion Devices
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674586
SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTING AND CONTROLLING TEMPERATURE OF INTELLIGENT NEW ENERGY FARMHOUSE INTEGRATED WITH TUNNEL WIND AND SOLAR ENERGY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12656024
METHOD FOR PRODUCING PLASMONIC-NANOSTRUCTURE SPECTRALLY SELECTIVE SOLAR ABSORBER HAVING HIGH SOLAR ABSORPTANCE, LOW THERMAL EMITTANCE, AND HIGH THERMAL STABILITY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+20.5%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month