Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/702,993

DREDGING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DREDGING

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Oct 22, 2021 — NO 20211272 +1 more
Examiner
TSUI, ALFRED H
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Granfoss AS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
33%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 33% of cases
33%
Career Allowance Rate
68 granted / 206 resolved
-19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
260
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 206 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . STATUS OF CLAIMS This Non-Final action is in reply to the application 18702993 filed on 04/19/2024 Claim 14 and 16 are objected Claims 1 - 19 are currently pending and have been examined. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/19/2024 was fully considered by the examiner. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1and 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 discloses the limitation “wherein the docking stations are attached in relation to a bottom surface thus providing a fixed and permanent location that is unaffected by elements such as waves, water current, motion, and tide” is indefinite because it is unclear how the docking stations can be unaffected by the elements of the waves water current motion and tide. Appropriate correction is requested. Claim 17 discloses the limitation of “ for a mining operation, a coastal reinforcement operation, the construction of an artificial peninsula or artificial island, the anchoring of equipment or the laying of cables or pipes, a salvage operation for releasing a stranded or sunk vessel, the removing of granular material from behind an artificial dam or from a mine or tunnel, the removing of granular material from a vessel, a container or a basin, and / or the dredging of a waterway, such as a channel, a river, a lake, a harbor, or a marine navigation channel.” is an improper use claim that lacks sufficient detail for an apparatus claim, and is indefinite because it is unclear on its usage. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 – 3, 5 – 13, 15, 17 – 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable by US PG Pub 20220145756 – Vagata et al. hereinafter as VAGATA in view of WO2017035344 – Halkyard et al. hereinafter as HALKYARD Regarding Claim 1 VAGATA discloses: A dredging system for removing submerged granular material from a bottom surface, the dredging system comprising: - at least one dredging robot for removing granular material and multiple docking stations for offloading removed granular material from the at least one dredging robot, wherein the at least one dredging robot is adapted to shuttle between the multiple docking stations and comprises a control unit configured to operate the at least one dredging robot by remote control, semi-autonomously and / or autonomously;(fig. 1 - para. 0012 – autonomous vehicles for mapping , para. 0037 – wherein collection of material by autonomous harvest vehicles and automated under water vehicles, wherein the docking stations comprises of combination of 103 and 104 wherein the pairing constitutes more than one set of docking stations.) a docking coupling configured to offload removed granular material and comprising an electrical outlet provided on each docking station;( wherein the docking station includes an off load for removing granular material ( 103) and electrical outlet (104) USH wherein this is the power and communication hub) PNG media_image1.png 482 1014 media_image1.png Greyscale VAGATA discloses of removing submerged granular material from a bottom surface, HALKYARD discloses wherein the stations are attached providing a fixed and permanent location that is unaffected by elements such as waves, water current, motion, and tide and at least one riser pipe for transporting removed granular material from the multiple docking stations to a remote location, HALKYARD further discloses: wherein the docking stations are attached in relation to a bottom surface thus providing a fixed and permanent location that is unaffected by elements such as waves, water current, motion, and tide (Fig. 7 and 14 – where in it shows an anchoring system and additionally para. 0071 – a fixed location to the seabed) wherein the at least one dredging robot includes at least one of: a coupling configured to be connected to the docking coupling provided on each docking station and a coupling on an umbilical line for coupling the docking station to a dredging robot;( para. 0067 – where in the robot can dock and undock it self and from the slurry discharge hose jumper) at least one riser pipe for transporting removed granular material from the multiple docking stations to a remote location. ( para. 0064 - wherein the 707 reads on riser pipe for removing the granular material from the multiple docking stations to a remote location) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicants invention for VAGATA method of removing submerged granular material and into multiple docking stations with robot to include the ability for the docking stations to wherein the docking stations are attached in relation to a bottom surface thus providing a fixed and permanent location that is unaffected by elements such as waves, water current, motion, and tide and at least one riser pipe for transporting removed granular material from the multiple docking stations to a remote location as taught by HALKYARD. This would allow VAGATA to pre set anchors and position the slurry pump excavators( para. 0063) Regarding Claim 2 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses: 2. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, wherein the dredging robot is a bottom crawler or a submersible drone. (fig. 1 - para. 0012 – autonomous vehicles for mapping , para. 0037 – wherein collection of material by autonomous harvest vehicles and automated under water vehicles,) Regarding Claim 3 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses: 3. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, wherein the dredging robot comprises at least one suction head for removing granular material( Fig. 7 – dredge pump 701 suction head) Regarding Claim 5 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses: 5. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, wherein the dredging robot comprises one or more shearing elements, for loosening of the submerged granular material, and wherein the one or more shearing elements comprise teeth, blades, knives, rotating blades, spiked rollers and /or nozzles for emitting high-pressure fluid jets. ( fig. 6 , para. 0100 - rotating teeth to loose the materials) Regarding Claim 6 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses: 6. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, wherein the dredging robot comprises a tank for temporary storage of removed granular material.(fig. 6 and 7 – bucket 605 - tank for materials) Regarding Claim 7 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 6: VAGATA discloses: 7. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 6, wherein the dredging Robot comprises a battery for providing power to the dredging robot.( para. 0042 – where in a battery powered robot provides power) Regarding Claim 8 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 6: VAGATA discloses dredging robot that can collect granular material HALKYARD discloses power line connected to the dredging robot, for providing power to the dredging HALKYARD further discloses : 8. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 6, further comprising a power line connected to the dredging robot, for providing power to the dredging. Para. 0067 - where in the power and data umbilical cord 904) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filling date of the applicants invention for VAGATA a dredging robot that can collect granular material to utilize a power line connected to the dredging robot for providing power to the dredging robot as taught by HALKYARD. This would allow the VAGATA to power to the robot when operating independently ( para. 0067) Regarding Claim 9 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 6: VAGATA discloses, a dredging robot that can off load removed granular material from dredging robot, HALKYARD discloses an umbilical line for off loading material, HALKYARD further discloses: 9. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, further comprising an umbilical line for offloading removed granular material from the dredging robot, wherein the umbilical line connects the dredging robot with the docking station. ( Fig. 9 – 0067 wherein it can dock and undock it self from the hose jumper 706 ) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the before the effective filling date of the applicants invention for VAGATA a dredging robot that can off load removed granular material from dredging robot to utilize an umbilical line for off loading material as taught by HALKYARD. This would allow the VAGATA to directly remove the slurry using the hose to allow vertical and horizontal positions of the dredge to change relative to the rise so it doesn’t exert undo forces on the pump system ( para. 0063) Regarding Claim 10 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 9 : HALYYARD discloses the combination as disclosed in claim 9 10. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 9, wherein the umbilical line comprises a power line for providing power to the dredging robot, and optionally one or more of an integrated communications line, a compressed-gas line, at least one hydraulic line and / or a lubrication line.( para. 0067 – wherein the umbilical cord 904 has data lines) Regarding Claim 11 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses: wherein the dredging robot comprises an underwater positioning system. ( para. 0161 – wherein the spatial self location and knowledge of position of the harvesting area) Regarding Claim 12 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses, a dredging robot that can off load removed granular material, HALKYARD discloses an riser pipe to remove granular material as taught in claim 1 12. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, further comprising conveying means- feat for conveying removed granular material through the riser pipe fat. ( para. 0067 - where in granular goes through a riser pipe) Regarding Claim 13 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 12: HALYYARD discloses the combination as disclosed in claim 12 13. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 12, wherein the conveying means- feat comprises a slurry pump, an eductor, or a compressor, and wherein the conveying means--feat optionally further comprises a booster pump.(Para. 0066 - Slurry pump) Regarding Claim 15 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses 15. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 1, comprising multiple dredging robots ( fig. 1 – AHV 102 ) Regarding Claim 17 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 1: VAGATA discloses 17. (Currently Amended) Use of a dredging system of claim 1, for a mining operation (para. 0038 - mineral exploration), Regarding Claim 18 VAGATA discloses 18. (Currently Amended) Method for dredging of submerged granular material, comprising: providing a dredging system according to claim 1 ; (fig. 1 - para. 0012 – autonomous vehicles for mapping , para. 0037 – wherein collection of material by autonomous harvest vehicles and automated under water vehicles, wherein the docking stations comprises of combination of UBS(underwater buffer stations) 103 and USH (Underwater smart hubs) 104 wherein the pairing constitutes more than one set of docking stations.) removing granular material with the dredging robot; ( para. 0037 – where in the materials are transferred from robot to UBS 103) offloading removed granular material from the dredging robot to the docking station; (para. 0037 – where in the materials are transferred from robot to UBS 103) VAGATA discloses of removing submerged granular material from a bottom surface, HALKYARD discloses transporting granular material from docking station to a remote location through the riser pipe, HALKYARD further discloses: transporting removed granular material from the docking station to a remote location through the riser pipe-fat. ( para. 0064 - wherein the 707 reads on riser pipe for removing the granular material from the multiple docking stations to a remote location) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicants invention for VAGATA method of removing submerged granular material to include the ability for transporting granular material from docking station to a remote location through the riser pipe as taught by HALKYARD. This would allow VAGATA to improve recovery process of granular and remove the elements from the seabed ( para. 0015) Regarding Claim 19 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 18: VAGATA discloses 19. (Currently Amended) Method according to claim 18, further comprising instructing the at least one dredging system to remove granular material at one or more dredging locations during one or more time-intervals. (para. 0058 - wherein the time intervals are based upon the battery consumption ) Claim(s) 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable by US PG Pub 20220145756 – Vagata et al. hereinafter as VAGATA in view of WO2017035344 – Halkyard et al. hereinafter as HALKYARD in view of US PG Pubs 20170037598 – Linner et al. hereinafter as LINNER Regarding Claim 4 VAGATA / HALKYARD discloses claim 3: VAGATA of an autonomous underwater vehicle that has a suction head , LINNER discloses of an underwater vehicle that has a suction head that comprises one or more fluidizing nozzles, LINNER further discloses: 4. (Currently Amended) The dredging system of claim 3, wherein the suction head comprises one or more fluidizing nozzles. ( para. 0031 – wherein to loosen the sludge, uses a targeted jet to liquify) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicants invention for VAGATA / HALKYARD’s underwater vehicle with a suction head to utilize a suction head that comprises one or more fluidizing nozzles as taught in LINNER. This would allow VAGATA to break up larger obstacles into smaller particles to prevent clogging or blockages. ( para. 0031 – to prevent clogging and blockages) Allowable subject matter Claim 14 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. While dredging robots and docking stations are known in the art, VAGATA / HALKYARD, does not explicitly disclose where in wherein two or more docking stations are connected with a connecting pipe to a riser pipe or at least one docking station with several docking couplings for simultaneous docking of one or more dredging robots. Such modifications would require too significant of a modification and would constitute an improper degree of hindsight reasoning. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALFRED H TSUI whose telephone number is (571)272-9511. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 5712720547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.H.T/Examiner, Art Unit 3671 /CHRISTOPHER J SEBESTA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765441
AUTONOMOUS AGRICULTURAL CARRIER VEHICLE AND AUTONOMOUS AGRICULTURAL MACHINE
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12742314
PIN FOR COUPLING BETWEEN A WEAR ELEMENT AND A SUPPORT OF AN EARTH-MOVING MACHINE AND COUPLING SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729506
IMPROVEMENTS IN & RELATING TO THE WORKING OF GROUND AND OTHER SURFACES
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716188
BORING MACHINE COMPRISING A VARIABLE-GEOMETRY CUTTING DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12674299
Modified bucket
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
33%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+32.5%)
4y 3m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 206 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month