Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/703,002

Metasurface optofluidics for reflective displays integrated on transparent substrate

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
373 granted / 565 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
594
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-7 are currently pending in the present application. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS dated 01 December 2025 was considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shang et. al., “Real Time Tunable Colors from Microfluidic Reconfigurable All-Dielectric Metasurfaces,” ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2151-2159, cited by applicant in IDS dated 01 December 2025. Re: claim 1, Shang discloses a transparent substrate (pg. 2152, right column, discloses ITO glass substrate, where ITO is a known transparent material), a resonant metasurface including an array of pixels (Fig. 1a discloses a single pixel; pg. 2152, right column, discloses TiO2 nanoblock array where each block in the array is a pixel; resonating in ED and MD disclosed in caption to Figure 1(b) on pg. 2152), wherein the resonant metasurface is disposed on the transparent substrate (pg. 2152, right column, discloses that TiO2 array is disposed on the ITO glass substrate); a fluidic circuit (circuit comprising a microfluidic channel disclosed in Fig. 4a & on pg. 2154; pg. 2153, left column, discloses microfluidic channel having a size smaller than 100 nm) configured to provide a per-pixel tunable index of refraction in proximity to the resonant metasurface (configuration disclosed on pg. 2155, right column: “Figure 4a shows the image of the microfluidic chip, where the solvents are mechanically injected and ejected through the pipes, and the metasurface is embedded in the fluidic channel” and “the refractive index of surrounding media (nsur) increases from 1.00 to 1.333, 1.4795, and 1.6276 with the injection of water, DMSO, and CS2…”); wherein the per-pixel resonances include at least a symmetric-mode resonance and an antisymmetric-mode resonance for each pixel (Figure 5 discloses symmetric mode where encoded information is visible and antisymmetric mode that conceals encoded information; resonating in ED and MD disclosed in caption to Figure 1(b) on pg. 2152); wherein the per-pixel resonances of the resonant metasurface are altered by changes in the per-pixel tunable index of refraction (pg. 2155, right column discloses: “Figure 4a shows the image of the microfluidic chip, where the solvents are mechanically injected and ejected through the pipes, and the metasurface is embedded in the fluidic channel” and “the refractive index of surrounding media (nsur) increases from 1.00 to 1.333, 1.4795, and 1.6276 with the injection of water, DMSO, and CS2…”); whereby at least per-pixel broadband intensity modulation in reflection is provided (Figures 4b, 4c & 4e disclose broadband capabilities; pg. 2155, right column discloses “Taking a TiO2 metasurface…its optical properties within different injected solvents have been…plotted in Figure 4b…the refractive index of the surrounding media (nsur) increases from 1.00 to 1.333, 1.4795, and 1.6276 with the injection of water, DMSSO, and CS2…the reflection peak at 530 nm shifts to 550, 570, and 610 nm”). Re: claim 2, Shang discloses the limitations of claim 1, and Shang further discloses that changes in the per-pixel tunable index of refraction also provide color modulation in reflection (Figures 4b, 4c & 4e disclose color modulation; pg. 2155, right column discloses “Taking a TiO2 metasurface…its optical properties within different injected solvents have been…plotted in Figure 4b…the refractive index of the surrounding media (nsur) increases from 1.00 to 1.333, 1.4795, and 1.6276 with the injection of water, DMSSO, and CS2…the reflection peak at 530 nm shifts to 550, 570, and 610 nm”). Re: claim 3, Shang discloses the limitations of claim 1, and Shang further discloses that metasurface features of the resonant metasurface are laterally isotropic (Fig. 1a discloses lateral isotropism). Re: claim 4, Shang discloses the limitations of claim 1, and Shang further discloses that the per-pixel resonances have fluidically tunable resonant wavelengths (Figs. 4a, 4b, 1c & pg. 2155, right column discloses: “Figure 4a shows the image of the microfluidic chip, where the solvents are mechanically injected and ejected through the pipes, and the metasurface is embedded in the fluidic channel”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 - 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA MEDICH whose telephone number is (313)446-4819. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00 AM - 7:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANGELA M. MEDICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601894
OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT WITH AN F-THETA LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599290
OPTICAL CONNECTOR AND MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596214
POLARIZING PLATE AND OPTICAL DISPLAY APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578549
OPTICAL IMAGNING LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578611
ELECTRONIC PAPER DISPLAY DEVICES AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+20.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month