Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/703,873

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STABILIZING ONE OR MORE SENSORS ON A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Examiner
USTARIS, JOSEPH G
Art Unit
2483
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
60%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allow Rate
28 granted / 91 resolved
-27.2% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
97
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
64.6%
+24.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 91 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/08/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 3, 6, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zuckerman et al (US 20140297113 A1) (Zuckerman) in view of Nancollis et al. (US 20210190258 A1). Regarding claim 3, Zuckerman discloses a vehicle having a vehicle frame (See Fig. 10-1; 10-108), comprising: a cabin moveably attached to the vehicle frame (See Fig. 10-1; 10-104 and 10-108; para. 0065); a cabin actuator (See Fig. 10-1; 10-102), attached to the cabin and to the vehicle frame, arranged for stabilizing the cabin with respect to a gravitational reference frame (See Fig. 10-1 and para. 0068); a system comprising a second inertial measurement unit arranged to be attached to the vehicle frame and for determining a movement of the vehicle frame (See para. 0068); and wherein sensors are attached to the cabin (See para. 0068). Zuckerman does not disclose: a system comprising: a sensor frame arranged for receiving one or more sensors; a first inertial measurement unit attached to the sensor frame for determining a movement of the sensor frame; and a sensor frame actuator, attached to the sensor frame and arranged for being attached to the vehicle, and arranged for stabilizing the sensor frame with respect to the vehicle frame based on the determined movements of the sensor frame and vehicle frame, wherein the sensor frame actuator is attached to the cabin. Nancollis discloses a system for stabilizing (See Figs. 1-3) comprising: a system comprising: a sensor frame (See Fig. 3) arranged for receiving one or more sensors (See para. 0035; e.g. camera); a first inertial measurement unit attached to the sensor frame for determining a movement of the sensor frame (See para. 0043); a second inertial measurement unit arranged to be attached to the vehicle frame and for determining a movement of the vehicle frame (See para. 0043; e.g. additional sensors on vehicle); and a sensor frame actuator (See Fig. 3; 28), attached to the sensor frame and arranged for being attached to the vehicle (See Figs. 1-3), and arranged for stabilizing the sensor frame with respect to the vehicle frame based on the determined movements of the sensor frame and vehicle frame (See Figs 1-3, para. 0032 and 0042-0044 and Zuckerman Fig. 10-1; 10-108 and 10-110; para. 0063 and 0065), wherein said the sensor frame actuator is attached to the cabin (See Nancollis Figs 1-3 and Zuckerman para. 0068). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the stabilization system of Nancollis with the stabilization system as disclosed by Zuckerman in order to provide a stabilization system that supports a wider range of sensors (See Nancollis para. 0003 and 0035). Regarding claim 6, a vehicle according to claim 3, wherein the vehicle is a truck (See Zuckerman Fig. 10-1). Regarding claim 10, the system according to claim 6, further comprising one or more sensors attached to the sensor frame, wherein the one or more sensors comprise a camera (See Nancollis para. 0035; e.g. camera), a radar-device, and/or a lidar-device. Please see motivation in claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-9, filed 01/08/2026, with respect to claims 4 and 5 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejection of claims 4 and 5 has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 01/08/2026 with respect to claim 3 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues on pages 5-6 of the response with respect to claim 3, that Zuckerman and Nancollis do not disclose “the sensor frame actuator is attached to the cabin”. The examiner respectfully disagrees. Both Zuckerman and Nancollis discloses stabilizing systems used on vehicles (See Zuckerman Fig. 10-1 and Nancollis Figs. 1-3). Zuckerman discloses sensors and actuators are installed in vehicle and also states that sensors can be mounted in various location (e.g. chassis or cabin) (See Fig. 10-1; para. 0068). Nancollis also discloses a similar system. Nancollis discloses that their support stabilization system is mounted to a vehicle (See Figs 1-3, para. 0032 and 0042-0044). Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize mounting the system of Nancollis on a vehicle at various locations as suggested by Zuckerman (See Fig. 10-1; para. 0068). Therefore, the 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection of claim 3 is maintained. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Joseph G Ustaris whose telephone number is (571)272-7383. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5pm M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy C Johnson can be reached at 571-272-2238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH G USTARIS/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
May 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 22, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593025
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF REFRESHMENTS SPECIAL EFFECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587625
STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12556727
Content Generating Device, Content Distribution System, Content Generating Method, And Content Generating Program
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12501019
FLICKER-FREE DIRECTIONAL BACKLIGHT NAKED-EYE 3D DISPLAY DEVICE FOR MULTI-PERSON VIEWING
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12495066
MANAGED DETECTION AND RESPONSE SYSTEM AND METHOD BASED ON ENDPOINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
60%
With Interview (+28.7%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 91 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month