Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/703,979

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SENSING MEASUREMENT IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Examiner
ALGAHAIM, HELAL A
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
250 granted / 330 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
335
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 330 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huang et al US 20240248167 A1. Regarding claim 1, Huang discloses a method of performing a sensing measurement by a first station (STA) in a wireless LAN system, the method comprising: receiving, from a second STA, a sensing measurement element (receiving, by a first device, a measurement configuration element from a second device, (at least see claim 1) including first information indicating at least one of a trigger-based (TB) measurement instance or a non-TB measurement instance (wherein the measurement configuration element includes a field indicating whether a trigger-based or non-trigger-based measurement instance is to be performed, (at least see [0374], [0376] and claim 6); and performing the sensing measurement in at least one of the TB measurement instance or the non-TB measurement instance (at least see [0078] and [0374]) wherein the sensing measurement element includes at least one of a parameter set for the TB measurement instance or a parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance based on the first information, (at least see fig. 11, [0239] and claim 13). Regarding claim 2, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: based on the first information indicating the TB measurement instance, the sensing measurement element includes a parameter set for the TB measurement instance (at least see claims 2 and 3), and based on the first information indicating the non-TB measurement instance, the sensing measurement element includes a parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance (at least see claims 2 and 3). Regarding claim 3, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the parameter set for the TB measurement instance includes information about a polling phase, second information about a sensing measurement phase based on a null data physical protocol data unit (NDP) announcement frame, information about a trigger frame- based sensing measurement phase, and third information related to reporting (at least [0376] and claim 6), and the parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance includes the second information and the third information (at least see [0110], [0111] and [0374]). Regarding claim 4, Huang discloses the method of claim 3, wherein: the third information includes at least one of information indicating whether delayed reporting of feedback based on the sensing measurement is allowed, information indicating whether the feedback can be aggregated, or a type of the feedback (at least see [0110], [0111] and [0374]. Regarding claim 5, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the sensing measurement element is included in a sensing measurement setup request frame and transmitted to the second STA, and the first information is included in a common information field of the sensing measurement element (at least see [0207] to [0212]). Regarding claim 7, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the sensing measurement element includes a parameter set for the TB measurement instance, and based on the first information indicating the non-TB measurement instance, information about a polling phase and information about a trigger frame-based sensing measurement phase among parameter sets for the TB measurement instance are reserved (at least see [0110], [0111] and [0272]). Regarding claim 8, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the sensing measurement element includes an termination time field that sets a specific time, and based on a frame being not exchanged within the specific time after a measurement setup phase is initiated, the measurement setup step is terminated (at least see [0080] and [0141]).. Regarding claim 9, Huang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein: the first STA is a sensing responder (at least see [0087]), and the second STA is a sensing initiator (at least see [0090]). Regarding claim 10, Huang discloses a first station (STA) for performing sensing measurement in a wireless LAN system, the first STA comprising: at least one transceiver; and at least one processor connected to the at least one transceiver (at least see claims 5 and 7), wherein the at least one processor is configured to: receive, from the second STA through the at least one transceiver, a sensing measurement (receiving, by a first station, a measurement configuration element from a second station, at least see claim 1) element including first information indicating at least one of a trigger-based (TB) measurement instance or a non-TB measurement instance (wherein the measurement configuration element includes a field indicating whether a trigger-based or non-trigger-based measurement instance is to be performed, (at least see claim 2, [0374] and [0376]); and perform the sensing measurement in at least one of the TB measurement instance or the non-TB measurement instance, wherein the sensing measurement element includes at least one of a parameter set for the TB measurement instance or a parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance based on the first information (at least see fig. 11, [0239] and claim 13). 11. (Canceled) Regarding claim 12, Huang discloses a second station (STA) for performing sensing measurement in a wireless LAN system, the second STA comprising: at least one transceiver; and at least one processor connected to the at least one transceiver transceiver (at least see claims 5 and 7), wherein the at least one processor is configured to: transmit, to a first STA through the at least one transceiver, a sensing measurement element including first information indicating at least one of a trigger-based (TB) measurement instance or a non-TB measurement instance; and perform the sensing measurement in at least one of the TB measurement instance or the non-TB measurement instance, wherein the sensing measurement element includes at least one of a parameter set for the TB measurement instance or a parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance based on the first information (at least see fig. 11, [0239] and claim 13). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Da Silva “Specification Framework for TGbf”, IEEE DRAFT; 11-21-0504-03-SPECIFICATION-FRAMEWORK-FOR-TGBF, IEEE-SA MENTOR, PISCATAWAY, NJ USA in view of Huang Huang et al US 20240248167 A1. Regarding claims 1, 10 and 12, Huang discloses a method of performing a sensing measurement by a first station (STA) in a wireless LAN system, the method comprising: receiving, from a second STA, a sensing measurement element (receiving, by a first device, a measurement configuration element from a second device, (at least see chapter 7.1.1, sensing measurement setup…) including first information indicating at least one of a trigger-based (TB) measurement instance or a non-TB measurement instance (wherein the measurement configuration element includes a field indicating whether a trigger-based or non-trigger-based measurement instance is to be performed, (at least see chapter 7.1.1, a WLAN sensing procedure may be comprised of multiple sensing measurement instances); and performing the sensing measurement in at least one of the TB measurement instance or the non-TB measurement instance (at least see motion 15, 20/1851r4, and chapter 7.1.4.2 TB sensing measurement instance, also see 7.1.4.3) Da Silva does not disclose the first STA receives, from a second STA, a sensing measurement element including first information indicating at least one of a trigger- based TB measurement instance or a non-TB measurement instance and the sensing measurement element includes at least one of a parameter set for the TB measurement instance or a parameter set for the non-TB measurement instance based on the first information, (at least see fig. 11, [0239] and claim 13). However, Huang teaches these missing limitations (see rejection for claims 1, 10 and 11, also see [0239], [0078], [0374] and claim 13. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Da Silva by incorporating the teachings of Huang, as this combination enables flexible, efficient, and interoperable sensing measurement configuration through explicit selection and standardized parameter exchange for both trigger-based and non-trigger-based measurement instances. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELAL A ALGAHAIM whose telephone number is (571)270-5227. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Trammell can be reached at 571-272-6712. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELAL A ALGAHAIM/SPE , Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12553735
SELECTIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL LOCALIZATION AND NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12504293
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 8676413
ARRANGEMENT FOR DETERMINING A FORCE ACTING ON A RUDDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 18, 2014
Patent 8660716
COMPARATIVE VERTICAL SITUATION DISPLAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 25, 2014
Patent 8655536
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUGMENTING A GUIDANCE SYSTEM WITH A PATH SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 18, 2014
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month