Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/704,003

DIRECT-AXIS VOLTAGE BASED ANGULAR OFFSET CALIBRATION IN AN ELECTRIC MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Atieva, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 460 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 460 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Dixon et al. US publication no.: US 2021/0159830 A1. Regarding claim 1, Dixon et al. teach, A method comprising: measuring, for a permanent magnet motor having a rotor rotating at a speed, a direct-axis voltage in a rotor frame of reference (see figure 2 and figure 9, where the D-axis voltage is calculated), the speed being determined by an angular position sensor (position sensor 16, paragraphs 58 and 64); comparing the measured direct-axis voltage with a reference voltage (see figure 2 and paragraph 64, where the “target” voltage is set as 0 which corresponds to the reference voltage); determining, based on the comparing, an angle offset estimate of the angular position sensor; and iteratively adjusting the angle offset estimate until the measured direct-axis voltage substantially equals the reference voltage (see figures 2 and 9 and paragraphs 17 and 64, where it can be seen that the angle is adjusted until the D-axis voltage reaches the target voltage of 0 corresponding to the reference voltage). Regarding claims 2 and 11, Dixon et al. teach, the method of claim 1, wherein comparing the measured direct-axis voltage with the reference voltage includes comparing the measured direct-axis voltage with the reference voltage with a proportional integral controller (see paragraphs 19-20 and 64, where a closed loop PI controller is utilized). Regarding claims 3, 6, 12 and 15, Dixon et al. teach, The method of claim 2, wherein the reference voltage is zero volts (see paragraph 17 and 64 and figure 2, where target or reference voltage is zero). Regarding claims 4 and 13, Dixon et al. teach, The method of claim 2, wherein the proportional integral controller is configured to implement a regulator controller (see paragraphs 19-20 and 64, where a closed loop PI controller is utilized). Regarding claims 5 and 14, Dixon et al. teach, The method of claim 2, wherein the proportional integral controller is enabled in response to: an enable signal; and the speed being greater than or equal to a threshold speed (see paragraph 61, where the “minimum voltage” corresponds to greater than or equal to threshold speed). Regarding claim 7 and 16, Dixon et al. teach, The method of claim 1, further comprising generating torque with the permanent magnet motor based, at least in part, on the iteratively determined angle offset (see paragraphs 3-4). Regarding claims 8 and 17, Dixon et al. teach, The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the direct-axis voltage includes measuring the direct-axis voltage with the rotor freely spinning at the speed (see paragraphs 60-65, where the voltage is determined based on the rotation of the rotor at a speed). Regarding claim 9, A vehicle (see paragraph 2) comprising: a permanent magnet motor (motor 10, figure 9 and paragraph 43) including: a stator (stator 12, paragraph 43) a rotor (rotor 14, paragraph 45); and an angular position sensor (position sensor 16, paragraph 45); and a motor controller (controller 116, figure 1) configured to: measure, with the rotor rotating at a speed, a direct-axis voltage in a rotor frame of reference(see figure 2 and figure 9, where the D-axis voltage is calculated), the speed being determined by the angular position sensor; compare the measured direct-axis voltage with a reference voltage (see figure 2 and paragraph 64, where the “target” voltage is set as 0 which corresponds to the reference voltage); determine, based on the comparing, an angle offset estimate of the angular position sensor; and iteratively adjusting the angle offset estimate until the measured direct-axis voltage substantially equals the reference voltage (see figures 2 and 9 and paragraphs 17 and 64, where it can be seen that the angle is adjusted until the D-axis voltage reaches the target voltage of 0 corresponding to the reference voltage). Regarding claim 10, Dixon et al. teach, the vehicle of claim 9, wherein the direct-axis voltage is measured in the stator (see figure 1 and paragraphs 43 and 57). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603594
VOICE COIL MOTOR, METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING VOICE COIL MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603595
ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR SYSTEM, POSTION CONTROL SYSTEM, STAGE APPARATUS, LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, METHOD OF DETERMINING A MOTOR-DEPENDENT COMMUTATION MODEL FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603596
Power supply circuit in an inverter for driving an electrical machine, method of operating the power supply circuit and safety control device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592612
SYSTEM FOR DAMPING UNWANTED MOTOR MOVEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580456
ROTOR POWER TRANSFER CIRCUIT FOR ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 460 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month