Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/704,133

Novel Lipids For Delivery Of Nucleic Acid Segments

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 26, 2021 — provisional 63/271,960 +1 more
Examiner
HASTINGS, ALISON AZAR
Art Unit
1627
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Astrazeneca AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
54 granted / 85 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 85 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for priority. The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 63/271,960, filed on 10/26/2021. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/01/2024 is being considered by the examiner. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper content of an abstract of the disclosure. In chemical patent abstracts for compounds or compositions, the general nature of the compound or composition should be given as well as its use, e.g., “The compounds are of the class of alkyl benzene sulfonyl ureas, useful as oral anti-diabetics.” Exemplification of a species could be illustrative of members of the class. For processes, the type of reaction, reagents and process conditions should be stated, generally illustrated by a single example unless variations are necessary. The use of the term GFP SimpleStep ELISA® Kit (page 39), which is a trade name or a mark used in commerce, has been noted in this application. The term should be accompanied by the generic terminology; furthermore the term should be capitalized wherever it appears or, where appropriate, include a proper symbol indicating use in commerce such as ™, SM , or ® following the term. Although the use of trade names and marks used in commerce (i.e., trademarks, service marks, certification marks, and collective marks) are permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner which might adversely affect their validity as commercial marks. Drawings Figure 14 is objected to because of the poor image resolution making the image difficult to understand. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. While the specification provides narrowed subcategories of lipid nanoparticles of formula (I) and lists specific examples such as compounds 1-5 (see table 1, pages 36-42) and eGFP mRNA, hEPO or Luciferase mRNA(page 39), the disclosure does not demonstrate possession of the full scope of the claimed subject matter. The use of a method of treating any diseases or disorder with modified mRNA delivered by the instant nanoparticles encompasses additional, undefined methods beyond those described. However, the specification does not provide sufficient details, representative examples, or common principles to support the breadth of such an open-ended genus. For example, details such as what mRNA to treat which diseases, what compounds of the instant formula can form lipid nanoparticles suitable for treating which diseases, dosage regimes and schedules are necessary details for treating diseases and disorders and these details are not included in the instant application. For example, there are several biological barriers that are challenging to overcome when treating disease such as neurological diseases, pregnancy-related diseases, retinal diseases that require specific nanoparticle development[Han et al., Predictive High-Throughput Platform for Dual Screening of mRNA Lipid Nanoparticle Blood–Brain Barrier Transfection and Crossing, Nano Lett. 2024 February 07; 24(5): 1477–1486]. As such, a persona of ordinary skill in the art would not reasonably conclude that Applicant was in possession of the entire scope of claim 28. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17, 23, 25, 27 are allowed. Conclusion Claim 28 is rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALISON AZAR HASTINGS whose telephone number is (703)756-4584. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 7:30am-5pm EST Friday 7:30-4pm EST (every other Friday off). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at (571) 270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.A.H./ Examiner, Art Unit 1627 /Kortney L. Klinkel/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728135
CANNABINOID CONCENTRATE AND ISOLATE, METHOD OF OBTAINING THE SAME AND USE THEREOF
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715894
TRIPTOLIDE CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12692273
p53 MODULATORS AND USES THEREOF
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661357
USE OF PYRIDO[1,2-A]PYRIMIDONE ANALOGUE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636370
Combination Therapy For Treatment Of Cancer
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.2%)
3y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 85 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month