Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/704,323

SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR REDUCING NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO2) CONTENT IN FLUE GAS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Priority
Dec 29, 2021 — provisional 63/266,134 +2 more
Examiner
PREGLER, SHARON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Pentair, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
701 granted / 899 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
922
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I claims 1-14 in the reply filed on 9/8/26 is acknowledged. Claim Interpretations The phrases “top portion” and “bottom portion” are relative terms, however, are not indefinite when referring to the absorber column. However, the phrases are interpreted merely as “a top portion above the bottom portion” relative to the height of the tower. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Boo et al. US 2013/0259786. Regarding claim 1, Boo teaches a system for reducing nitrogen dioxide from flue gas comprising: A wash column designed to: receive the flue gas 30 containing the nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ([0010]); and treat the flue gas with a first water stream 60 entering through spray 120, the first water stream including an absorbing agent comprising thiosulfate salt reactant (sodium thiosulfate, [0021]). Regarding claim 2, Boo teaches wherein hot flue gas (from a combustion stage, ([0010]) is provided to the wash column at a first temperature, then transfers the heat to the cooler condensate, thus the first water stream is provided to the wash column at a second temperature, and wherein the first temperature is greater than the second temperature ([0006]-[0007],[0019], [0029]). Regarding claim 3, the first water stream is in fluid communication with a heat exchanger 140 that removes heat absorbed by the first water stream from the flue gas ([0140]). Regarding claim 4, the wash column further includes a top portion and a bottom portion (Figure 1), and wherein the top portion and the bottom portion are in fluid communication with a water stream recycling conduit 80 ([0019]). Regarding claim 5, the system comprises a control processing unit 230 with valves 190 (dosing mechanism) that supplies the water from chamber 180 and a valve 210 that supplies the thiosulfate salt (pH agent) to the water ([0022]). Regarding claims 6, the wash column includes an intercooler ([0016]) and a reaction section in the absorbing chamber 20 where the cooler actively cools the absorbing agent to allow condensation at the bottom of the chamber and the reaction near the top ([0016]-[0019]). Regarding claim 7, Boo teaches a second water stream directed to the condensing bottom section via line 40. Regarding claim 8, Boo teaches a system for reducing nitrogen dioxide from flue gas comprising: A wash column designed to: receive the flue gas 30 containing the nitrogen dioxide (NO2) ([0010]); and treat the flue gas with a first water stream 60 entering through spray 120, the first water stream including an absorbing agent comprising thiosulfate salt reactant (sodium thiosulfate, [0021]). The system comprises a control processing unit 230 with valves 190 (dosing mechanism) that supplies the water from chamber 180 and a valve 210 that supplies the thiosulfate salt (pH agent) to the water ([0022]). Regarding claim 9, the wash column is defined by a top portion and a bottom portion, and the inlet for the flue gas is coupled to the bottom portion of the wash column through line 30 and the water stream is provided to the top portion of the wash column through sprayer 120 (Figure 1). Regarding claims 10 and 11, the wash column further includes a top portion and a bottom portion (Figure 1), and wherein the top portion and the bottom portion are in fluid communication with a water stream recycling conduit 80 ([0019]), and the dosing mechanism (valves 110) is coupled to the water recycle stream ([0024]). Regarding claims 12 and 13, the system includes a gas discharge line 130 coupled to the wash columns and sensors that detect Nox concentrations, pH levels, and adsorbing agent concentrations ([0013]-[0018]). Control processing units adjust the amount of adsorbing agents, thus controls the valves that distribute the agent to the wash column ([0018]). Regarding claim 14, the system includes sensors that detect adsorbing agent concentrations ([0013]-[0018])control processing units adjust the amount of adsorbing agents, thus controls the valves that distribute the agent to the wash column ([0018]). Thus, an amount of thiosulfate salt is controlled to the reactor by the sensor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARON PREGLER whose telephone number is (571)270-5051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, In Suk Bullock can be reached at (571) 272-5954. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARON PREGLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723806
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS FROM RICH GAS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714958
COMPOSITE FOR AIR PURIFICATION, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND FILTER INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702947
MULTI-STAGE DIRECT CAPTURE OF CO2 FROM AIR
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702965
CARBON SORBENT-AZOBENZENE HYBRIDS FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND/OR USING SAID HYBRIDS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691402
A METHOD FOR REMOVING CO2 FROM A CO2-CONTAINING STREAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 7m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month