Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/704,820

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Priority
Oct 29, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021040006
Examiner
SCHEIBEL, ROBERT C
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
659 granted / 817 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 817 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 1 of [0056], “SSB #192” should be changed to “SSB #191”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al (US 2023/0422310) in view of Takano et al (US 2022/0345908). Regarding claim 7: Kim discloses a terminal comprising: a receiver (see communication unit 1410 of Figure 14, for example) that receives one reference signal in a first group among a plurality of reference signals that are transmitted using different resources respectively, time-division-multiplexed, and divided into a plurality of groups including the first group, a second group, and a third group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], which disclose multiple (LF) groups (group 1…Group LF) of reference signals (SSBs); as indicated in Figure 6, the SSBs within each group are time-division-multiplexed; as indicated in [0123], in one example, the number of groups (LF) may be 1, 2, or 4; in the case of 4, the groups include a first group, a second group, and a third group); and a processor (see controller 1430 of Figure 14, for example) that controls to receive one or more reference signals in the second group and one or more reference signals in the third group, based on reception of the one reference signal in the first group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], for example; in [0107], the UE may receive one of the SSBs through blind detection; further, based on this detected SSB, the UE may “identify the group index of the SSB, and identify frequency domains of the SSBs belonging to [FL-1] LF-1 different groups” and then “[t]he UE may receive the SSBs belonging to the LF-1 groups based on the identified frequency domain”; that is, based on the reception of the one reference signal in the first group, the UE receives one or more reference signals in at least the second and third groups). Kim is silent regarding the number of the plurality of reference signals, simply referring to this value as “L”. That is, Kim is silent regarding the limitation wherein a number of the plurality of reference signals is greater than 64. However, Takano discloses a similar system for transmitting SSBs (see Figure 5, for example). Takano further discloses that maximum L number (or number of SSBs/beams) may be larger than 64 to support higher frequency bands and the necessary narrower beams. See [0062], for example. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Kim to use a maximum of 128 of 256 SSBs as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. The rationale for doing so would have been to utilize higher frequency bands and cover a certain geographical area in an SSB burst with the required narrow beams used at this higher frequency as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. Regarding claim 9: Kim discloses a radio communication method for a terminal, comprising: receiving one reference signal in a first group among a plurality of reference signals that are transmitted using different resources respectively, time-division-multiplexed, and divided into a plurality of groups including the first group, a second group, and a third group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], which disclose multiple (LF) groups (group 1…Group LF) of reference signals (SSBs); as indicated in Figure 6, the SSBs within each group are time-division-multiplexed; as indicated in [0123], in one example, the number of groups (LF) may be 1, 2, or 4; in the case of 4, the groups include a first group, a second group, and a third group); and controlling to receive one or more reference signals in the second group and one or more reference signals in the third group, based on reception of the one reference signal in the first group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], for example; in [0107], the UE may receive one of the SSBs through blind detection; further, based on this detected SSB, the UE may “identify the group index of the SSB, and identify frequency domains of the SSBs belonging to [FL-1] LF-1 different groups” and then “[t]he UE may receive the SSBs belonging to the LF-1 groups based on the identified frequency domain”; that is, based on the reception of the one reference signal in the first group, the UE receives one or more reference signals in at least the second and third groups). Kim is silent regarding the number of the plurality of reference signals, simply referring to this value as “L”. That is, Kim is silent regarding the limitation wherein a number of the plurality of reference signals is greater than 64. However, Takano discloses a similar system for transmitting SSBs (see Figure 5, for example). Takano further discloses that maximum L number (or number of SSBs/beams) may be larger than 64 to support higher frequency bands and the necessary narrower beams. See [0062], for example. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Kim to use a maximum of 128 of 256 SSBs as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. The rationale for doing so would have been to utilize higher frequency bands and cover a certain geographical area in an SSB burst with the required narrow beams used at this higher frequency as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. Regarding claim 10: Kim discloses a base station comprising: a transmitter (see wireless communication unit 1510 of Figure 15, for example) that transmits one reference signal in a first group among a plurality of reference signals that are transmitted using different resources respectively, time-division-multiplexed, and divided into a plurality of groups including the first group, a second group, and a third group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], which disclose multiple (LF) groups (group 1…Group LF) of reference signals (SSBs); as indicated in Figure 6, the SSBs within each group are time-division-multiplexed; as indicated in [0123], in one example, the number of groups (LF) may be 1, 2, or 4; in the case of 4, the groups include a first group, a second group, and a third group); and a processor (see controller 1540 of Figure 15, for example) that controls to transmit one or more reference signals in the second group and one or more reference signals in the third group, which a terminal receives based on reception of the one reference signal in the first group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], for example; in [0107], the UE may receive one of the SSBs through blind detection; further, based on this detected SSB, the UE may “identify the group index of the SSB, and identify frequency domains of the SSBs belonging to [FL-1] LF-1 different groups” and then “[t]he UE may receive the SSBs belonging to the LF-1 groups based on the identified frequency domain”; that is, based on the reception of the one reference signal in the first group, the UE receives one or more reference signals in at least the second and third groups). Kim is silent regarding the number of the plurality of reference signals, simply referring to this value as “L”. That is, Kim is silent regarding the limitation wherein a number of the plurality of reference signals is greater than 64. However, Takano discloses a similar system for transmitting SSBs (see Figure 5, for example). Takano further discloses that maximum L number (or number of SSBs/beams) may be larger than 64 to support higher frequency bands and the necessary narrower beams. See [0062], for example. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Kim to use a maximum of 128 of 256 SSBs as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. The rationale for doing so would have been to utilize higher frequency bands and cover a certain geographical area in an SSB burst with the required narrow beams used at this higher frequency as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. Regarding claim 11: Kim discloses a system comprising a terminal and a base station (see the terminal/UE in Figure 14 and base station in Figure 15, for example), wherein the terminal comprises: a receiver (see communication unit 1410 of Figure 14, for example) that receives one reference signal in a first group among a plurality of reference signals that are transmitted using different resources respectively, time-division-multiplexed, and divided into a plurality of groups including the first group, a second group, and a third group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], which disclose multiple (LF) groups (group 1…Group LF) of reference signals (SSBs); as indicated in Figure 6, the SSBs within each group are time-division-multiplexed; as indicated in [0123], in one example, the number of groups (LF) may be 1, 2, or 4; in the case of 4, the groups include a first group, a second group, and a third group); and a processor (see controller 1430 of Figure 14, for example) that controls to receive one or more reference signals in the second group and one or more reference signals in the third group, based on reception of the one reference signal in the first group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], for example; in [0107], the UE may receive one of the SSBs through blind detection; further, based on this detected SSB, the UE may “identify the group index of the SSB, and identify frequency domains of the SSBs belonging to [FL-1] LF-1 different groups” and then “[t]he UE may receive the SSBs belonging to the LF-1 groups based on the identified frequency domain”; that is, based on the reception of the one reference signal in the first group, the UE receives one or more reference signals in at least the second and third groups), the base station comprises: a transmitter (see wireless communication unit 1510 of Figure 15, for example) that transmits the one reference signal in the first group (disclosed throughout; see Figures 6, 9A, and 9B and [0101]-[0107], for example; see [0106] and step 904 of Figure 9A, for example). Kim is silent regarding the number of the plurality of reference signals, simply referring to this value as “L”. That is, Kim is silent regarding the limitation wherein a number of the plurality of reference signals is greater than 64. However, Takano discloses a similar system for transmitting SSBs (see Figure 5, for example). Takano further discloses that maximum L number (or number of SSBs/beams) may be larger than 64 to support higher frequency bands and the necessary narrower beams. See [0062], for example. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Kim to use a maximum of 128 of 256 SSBs as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. The rationale for doing so would have been to utilize higher frequency bands and cover a certain geographical area in an SSB burst with the required narrow beams used at this higher frequency as suggested by Takano in [0052], for example. Regarding claim 8: Kim discloses the limitations that the plurality of groups correspond to a plurality of periods (disclosed throughout; see [0101] and Figure 6, for example, which indicates that each of the groups corresponds to a plurality of periods (such as the period during which SSB0 is transmitted, the period during which SSB1 is transmitted, etc.); as indicated in [0101], the SSBs are continuously mapped to these periods starting at time t1), and the receiver receives the plurality of groups in the plurality of periods, respectively (disclosed throughout; see Figure 9B, and [0107], which discloses that the UE’s receiver receives the SSBs in the plurality of groups and periods). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhang et al (US 2022/0338140) discloses a method for transmitting SSBs from a network to a terminal device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert C Scheibel whose telephone number is (571)272-3169. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan A Phillips can be reached at 571-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Robert C. Scheibel Primary Examiner Art Unit 2467 /Robert C Scheibel/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467 June 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 03, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745173
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733041
CLOUD-CENTRIC DESIGN FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) INFRASTRUCTURE-BASED POSITIONING
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12713340
BASE STATION AND TERMINAL APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713356
NEW MODE IN POWER SAVING MODE (PSM)'S ACTIVE TIME DURATION
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12701548
PRE-PAGING FOR DEEP COVERAGE SCENARIOS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 9m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 817 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month