Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/705,260

ELECTROPORATION THERAPY FOR TURBINATE REDUCTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 26, 2021 — provisional 63/271,825 +1 more
Examiner
GOOD, SAMANTHA M
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
319 granted / 469 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
501
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.7%
+35.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 469 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A: Figure 1 in the reply filed on May 29, 20206 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by DiSimone et al (2018/0296264). Referring to claim 1, DiSimone et al teaches an electroporation delivery device (paragraphs 0007 and 0058-0060) comprising: a shaft (520) (paragraph 0058; Figure 5); a balloon (510) attached to a distal end of the shaft (paragraph 0058; Figure 5); and one or more electrode spines (lines shown in Figure 5) attached to the balloon, each of the one or more electrode spines including one or more electrodes (530) (paragraphs 0045, 0058 and 0062; Figure 5). Referring to claim 2, DiSimone et al teaches wherein the balloon (510) is made of a porous material (paragraph 0061; Figure 5). Referring to claim 4, DiSimone et al teaches wherein the one or more electrodes includes at least four electrodes (530) (paragraphs 0045, 0058 and 0062; Figure 5). Referring to claim 5, DiSimone et al teaches wherein the balloon is an elliptical shape when inflated (Figure 5) Claims 1 and 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Stewart et al (2019/0030328). Referring to claim 1, Stewart et al teaches an electroporation delivery device (paragraphs 0057 and 0075) comprising: a shaft (22) (paragraph 0058; Figures 1 -4); a balloon (30) attached to a distal end of the shaft (paragraphs 0059; Figures 1-4); and one or more electrode spines (41) attached to the balloon (30), each of the one or more electrode spines including one or more electrodes (18) (paragraph 0064; Figures 1-4). Referring to claim 3, Stewart et al teaches the one or more electrode spines (41) includes four electrode spines (paragraph 0064; Figures 1-4). Referring to claim 4, DiSimone et al teaches wherein the one or more electrodes includes at least four electrodes (18) (paragraphs 0057 and 0064; Figure 4). Referring to claim 5, DiSimone et al teaches wherein the balloon is an elliptical shape when inflated (paragraphs 0060 and 0071; Figure 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMANTHA M GOOD whose telephone number is (571)270-7480. The examiner can normally be reached Mon to Wed, 7am to 3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at 571-272-1213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMANTHA M GOOD/Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /MICHAEL F PEFFLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678213
METHOD FOR MONITORING A HIGH RESISTANCE CONDITION AT AN ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR, ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR AND ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12642555
METHODS OF TREATING A VERTEBRAL BODY
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642571
MULTIPLEXED HAND SWITCHES FOR USE WITH ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATORS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636061
ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR AND SYSTEM
4y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636063
MOTION SENSING ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICES
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+11.1%)
5y 0m (~2y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month