Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/705,368

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTRAOPERATIVE LIFETIME IMAGING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 28, 2021 — provisional 63/272,847 +2 more
Examiner
LI, JOHN DENNY
Art Unit
3798
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
THE GENERAL HOSPITAL Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
165 granted / 257 resolved
-5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+47.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
299
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 257 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1, 3, and 31 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claims 1, 3, and 31; “determining FLT data at any of the plurality of locations above a threshold indicative a presence of cancer cells” should be changed to “determining FLT data at any of the plurality of locations above a threshold indicative of a presence of cancer cells” for grammar. In claims 1, 3, and 31; “the claims recite generating a report indicating any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative the presence of the cancer cells” should be changed to “the claims recite generating a report indicating any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative of the presence of the cancer cells” for grammar. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3, and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 3, and 31, the claims recite generating a report indicating any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative the presence of the cancer cells. It is unclear how these any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative the presence of the cancer cells relate to the determined “any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative the presence of the cancer cells” set forth in the previous line. Are these the same locations? A subset of them? The Examiner recommends amending the claims to more clearly indicate the relationship between these indicated locations and the determined locations previously set forth. The Examiner apologies for delaying Allowance with this matter and attempted to contact the Applicant 7/14/2026 for an Examiner’s amendment to address this issue but believes this to be a relatively straightforward issue to fix. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-30 are allowed. Claims 1-4, 6-16, and 31 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art does not disclose nor reasonably suggest the limitations set forth in the independent claims. Specifically the prior art does not clearly and explicitly disclose acquiring fluorescence lifetime (FLT) data from tissue having received a fluorescent compound; processing the FLT data to determine a FLT signal at each of a plurality of locations across the tissue; determining FLT data at any of the plurality of locations above a threshold indicative a presence of cancer cells; and generating a report indicating any of the plurality of locations above the threshold as indicative the presence of cancer cells, wherein acquiring the FLT data includes acquiring fluorescence data cumulatively from the tissue beginning at a chosen time origin to an end point or to multiple time points in time or acquiring fluorescence data from the tissue at a sequence of consecutive time points starting from a chosen time origin to a chosen end point, wherein the FLT data is given by: yTD (t) = aoe-t/ where yTD (t) is time domain data as a function of time, t, between the chosen time origin and the chosen end point, a0 is a decay amplitude, which is related to fluorophore concentration, quantum yield, and experimental scaling constants, and T is a lifetime of a fluorophore applied to the tissue to elicit the FLT data and wherein the FLT data is given by: yQTD (t) = y(t')dt', where yQTD is the quasi time domain data as a function of time, t, from the chosen time origin to the end point or multiple points in time as set forth in the independent claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John Li whose telephone number is (313)446-4916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday; 5:30 AM to 3:30 PM Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pascal Bui-Pho can be reached at (571) 272-2714. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN D LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678065
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, CAPILLARY REFILL TIME DETERMINING SYSTEM AND CAPILLARY REFILL TIME DETERMINING METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678125
ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667429
METHOD FOR SYNCHRONIZING MOVEMENT CONTROL AND LOCATION RECOGNITION FOR MICRO-ROBOT BY USING BED-INTEGRATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657799
Apparatus and Process for Electromagnetic Imaging
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648752
NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR COMPLIANCE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.8%)
3y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 257 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month