DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Objections
Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: line 8, “itself” should be changed to –a single optical fiber—and line 9, “this device” to –the device--. Appropriate correction is required.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1 and 6-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sato, US Patent, US Patent No. 6,477,288.
Regarding claim 1, Sato teaches an optical line switching system comprising: an acquisition step of acquiring transmission path information indicating a configuration of a network that transmits an optical signal via a plurality of relay nodes and a transmission path of the optical signal transmitted by the network (see col. 7, line 60 to col. 8, line 22, col. 12 line 1+); and a determination step of determining arrangement of optical amplifiers in the network by grouping a plurality of optical fibers passing through the same relay node based on the transmission path information, and determining whether optical amplification is required in each of the relay nodes for each group of the optical fibers ( see Fig. 1A-1B; embodiment 1 in the specification, the above node arrangement enhances network reliability and reduces network cost by decreasing the number of system components that are required to implement the optical network protection schemes; particularly, the number of optical switches and optical amplifiers are minimized relative to the conventional system.
Regarding claim 6, Sato teaches an optical line switching system comprising: an acquire configured to acquire transmission path information indicating a configuration of a network that transmits an optical signal via a plurality of relay nodes and a transmission path of the optical signal transmitted by the network (see col. 7, line 60 to col. 8, line 22, col. 12 line 1+); and a determine configured to determine arrangement of optical amplifiers in the network by grouping a plurality of optical fibers passing through the same relay node based on the transmission path information, and to determine whether optical amplification is required in each of the relay nodes for each group of the optical fibers ( see Fig. 1A-1B; embodiment 1 in the specification, the above node arrangement enhances network reliability and reduces network cost by decreasing the number of system components that are required to implement the optical network protection schemes; particularly, the number of optical switches and optical amplifiers are minimized relative to the conventional system.
Regarding claim 7, Sato teaches an optical line switching system comprising: an acquire configured to acquire transmission path information indicating a configuration of a network that transmits an optical signal via a plurality of relay devices and a transmission path of the optical signal transmitted by the network (see col. 7, line 60 to col. 8, line 22, col. 12 line 1+); and a determine configured to determine arrangement of optical amplifiers in the network by grouping a plurality of optical fibers passing through this device itself or a plurality of optical fibers passing through the same relay device other than this device, based on the transmission path information, and to determine whether optical amplification is required in each of the relay devices for each group of the optical fibers ( see Fig. 1A-1B; embodiment 1 in the specification, the above node arrangement enhances network reliability and reduces network cost by decreasing the number of system components that are required to implement the optical network protection schemes; particularly, the number of optical switches and optical amplifiers are minimized relative to the conventional system.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 3-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The applicant teaches an optical amplifier arrangement method which includes setting up a transmission path information indicating a configuration of a network that transmits an optical signal via a plurality of relay nodes and a transmission path of the optical signal transmitted by the network, positioning optical amplifiers in the network by grouping a plurality of optical fibers passing through the same relay node based on the transmission path information, wherein when the number of optical fibers grouped in the relay node is M and the number of optical amplifiers per relay node of each group is N, transmission of the optical signal is simulated for possible patterns made by combinations of M and N values to determine the arrangement of the optical amplifiers. These limitations in conjunction with other limitations in the claims were not shown by the prior art of record.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Uehara, US Pub. 2001/0038482, disclose an optical transmission system having an optical surge suppression function.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL ST CYR whose telephone number is (571)272-2407. The examiner can normally be reached M to F 8:00-8:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael G Lee can be reached at 571-272-2398. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
DANIEL ST CYR
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2876
/DANIEL ST CYR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Prosecution Insights