Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/705,857

Steering system for a wheeled vehicle with at least two steerable wheels and method for controlling in particular the operation of such a steering system

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 04, 2025
Examiner
ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Trelleborg Carquefou
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
580 granted / 761 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
810
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-4 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites in part “… at least partially pre-filled with a gas, called filling gas…the steering casing is a sensor for determining the presence or the gas concentration of said filling gas inside the closed volume…” It is unclear the filling gas is, the specification does clearly define what filling gas is , it is special gas ? or air gas ? Same issue applied to claim 3, 4 and 9. Claims 2-4 and 9 will be examined as best understood. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 6-8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Sikora [DE 102012019427]. Regarding claim 1: Sikora shows a steering system (10) for a wheeled machine with at least two steered wheels, said steering system (10) comprising: a rack (12),a steering casing (14) disposed around the rack (12), at least one member (35) for driving the axial sliding movement of the rack (12) inside the steering casing (14),two steering tie rods (25, 25) having an end that is coupled to an end of the rack (12) by an articulated connection (see fig 2) and an opposite end that is couplable to one of the steered wheels of the machine ,two bellows (18, 46) each protecting an articulated connection (see fig 2) and each connecting a tie rod (25) to the steering casing (14), the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing (14) delimiting a volume (26) that is closed in such a way as to be tight at least with respect to air Wherein the closed volume (26) delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing is at least partially pre-filled with a gas (air), called filling gas wherein the steering system comprises a monitoring device (44), and in that this monitoring device (44) comprises at least one sensor for determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume (26) delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing (14), which is a sensor for determining the presence or the gas concentration of said filling gas inside the closed volume (26). wherein the steering system comprises, for the at least partial pre-filling of the volume (26) delimited by the bellows (18, 26) and the steering casing with filling gas, at least one closable gas intake orifice in communication with the volume, said gas intake orifice (58) being in the closed state when said volume is in the pre-filled state. Regarding claim 4: Sikora shows wherein the or at least one of the sensors (44) for determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume delimited by the bellows and the steering casing (14) is disposed at the steering casing (see [0008] and [0027]). Regarding claim 6: Sikora shows wherein the monitoring device (44) comprises a device for emitting an audible or luminous warning signal and a control unit said control unit being configured to acquire data supplied by the at least one sensor for determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume and to control the device for emitting an audible or luminous warning signal as a function of said data (see [0031]). Regarding claim 7: Sikora shows wherein the member (35) for driving the axial sliding movement of the rack (12) inside the steering casing (14) is a rotary member (35) in meshed engagement with the rack, and in that the steering system comprises at least one member for driving the rotation of the member (35) for driving the axial sliding movement of the rack inside the steering casing (14). Regarding claim 8: Sikora shows a method for controlling a steering system for a wheeled machine with at least two steered wheels, said steering system comprising a rack (12), a steering casing (14) disposed around the rack (12), a member (35) for driving the axial sliding movement of the rack (12) inside the steering casing (14), two steering tie rods (25, 25) having an end that is coupled to an end of the rack (12) by an articulated connection (see fig 2) and an opposite end that is couplable to one of the steered wheels of the machine, two bellows (18, 46) each protecting an articulated connection and each connecting a tie rod (25, 25) to the steering casing (14), the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing (14) delimiting a volume that is closed in such a way as to be tight at least with respect to air, wherein the steering system being as claimed claim 1, said method comprises at least a step of determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing (14). wherein, prior to the step of determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing, the method comprises a step of at least partially pre-filling (air) the volume (26) with at least one filling gas, and in that the step of determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume (26) delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing is a step of determining the presence or the gas concentration of said filling gas inside the closed volume (26). Regarding claim 10: Sikora shows wherein, the monitoring device (44) comprising a device for emitting an audible or luminous warning signal ([0031]) and a control unit, said method comprises a step of acquiring, by said control unit, data supplied by the sensor for determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume and a step of controlling the device for emitting an audible or luminous warning signal as a function of said data ([0031]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sikora [DE 102012019427] in view of [US Pub # 2010/0023221]. Regarding claim 5: Sikora wherein the or at least one of the sensors (44) for determining a parameter representative of the tightness, at least with respect to gases, of the closed volume delimited by the bellows (18, 46) and the steering casing (14) (see translation “If the pressure curve currently detected by the sensor differs by more than a predefined tolerance from the reference pressure curve, this indicates a leakage in the rack and pinion steering, which is indicated to the driver by a suitable warning signal, for example. Then the driver can examine the tightness of the rack and pinion steering in a specialist workshop and restore it if necessary”). Sikora does not explicitly disclose the sensor is an infrared measurement sensor. However Klein teaches that the sensor is infrared sensor (see [0025]). It would have been obvious to someone having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filling date to have replaced the sensor in Sikora reference with infrared sensor which offers the advantage of non- contact measurement, high sensitivity and remote detection capabilities. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 03/11/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant argument that the filling gas is not ambient air and it is a gas that is present in in the air. A gas is the ambient air is still considered a gas that is present in the air. In response to applicant argument that The prior art failed to teach closed volume delimited by the bellows and the steering casing is at least partially pre-filled with a gas, called filling gas. Moreover, there in no teaching or suggestion for the at least partial pre-filling of the volume delimited by the bellows and the steering casing with said filling gas, at least one closable gas intake orifice in communication with the volume, said gas intake orifice being in the closed state when said volume is in the pre-filled state Bellows in the prior art have air which is considered gas and closed volume delimited by the bellows (“…At one axial end is the pressure chamber 26 through the bellows 18 sealed…”) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. For example [US # 2020/0332870] shows steering system (100) with steering casing and elbows (212,212,) tie rods (1211, 1211) and sensor ([0063]). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZAKARIA ELAHMADI whose telephone number is (571)270-5324. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 10-6 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached on 571-270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAKARIA ELAHMADI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 04, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 11, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600191
An Off-road Vehicle and Suspension for Such Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602064
ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577087
OPERATOR CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578007
LINEAR DRIVE APPARATUS FOR CONVERTING A ROTATIONAL MOVEMENT INTO A LINEAR MOVEMENT AND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560227
BALL SCREW DRIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month