Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/706,123

TESTING ARTICLE FOR USE IN AN AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Priority
Nov 11, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021130065
Examiner
MERCADO, ALEXANDER A
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Philip Morris International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
426 granted / 614 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
646
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 614 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions The restriction/election requirement dated 7 April 2026 is withdrawn in its entirety Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 55 – 70 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 55, the claim recites “a non-aerosol-generating substrate”. It is unclear as to what conditions are occurring to the substrate such that the substrate can be considered “non-aerosol generating”, thus rendering the claim indefinite. For example, does the substrate not generate an aerosol when heated within a heating chamber? Does the substrate not generate an aerosol when at room temperature? Claims dependent upon a rejected claim are therefore rejected as well. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 55, 56, 59, 62, 63, 66 - 69 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Koyama et al. (WO 2021/020348). Regarding Claim 55, Koyama discloses a testing article (1) for insertion into a heating chamber (chamber in which 105 lies) of an aerosol-generating device (101) [0002], the testing article comprising: an elongate body configured to be received within the heating chamber of the aerosol-generating device (Figure 4); and a heatable substrate (10) configured to be received within the elongate body and to be heated when the testing article is located within the heating chamber of the aerosol- generating device [0002], wherein the heatable substrate is a non-aerosol-generating substrate (e.g. tobacco does not generate aerosol at room temperature). Regarding Claim 56, Koyama discloses the heatable substrate comprises a fibrous material [0012]. Regarding Claim 59, Koyama discloses comprising a substrate cavity configured to receive the heatable substrate (cavity in which 10 lies) (Figure 4), the substrate cavity being defined within the elongate body (Figure 4). Regarding Claim 62, Koyama discloses a cooling opening (in 14) configured to establish a fluid communication between the heatable substrate and an exterior of the testing article (Figure 4), the cooling opening being defined on the elongate body (Figure 4). Regarding Claim 63, Koyama discloses a heat insulating element (13b) circumscribing a portion of the elongate body (Figure 4). Regarding Claim 66, Koyama discloses a testing system comprising a testing article according to claim 55 (see rejection of Claim 55 above) and an aerosol-generating device (101), the aerosol-generating device comprising a heating chamber (chamber in which 105 lies) and a heating element (105) configured to externally heat a testing article received within the heating chamber [0002, 0012] (Figure 4). Regarding Claim 67, Koyama discloses a method of testing an aerosol-generating device (101) with a testing article according to claim 55 (see rejection of Claim 55 above), the method comprising the steps of: inserting the testing article into a heating chamber of the aerosol-generating device comprising a heating element (105) [0012]; and performing a testing cycle comprising: activating the heating element so as to heat the testing article received within the heating chamber [0020, 0072], and deactivating the heating element [0072]. Regarding Claim 68, Koyama discloses each testing cycle comprises drawing air through the testing article [0072]. Regarding Claim 69, Koyama discloses a plurality of testing cycles is performed [0072]. Conclusion As the claims are rejected under 112(b), a complete search and consideration of the claims was not possible. Upon applicant’s clarification of the claims, a comparison with the prior art will again be made. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER MERCADO whose telephone number is (571)270-7094. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9am - 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura Martin can be reached at (571) 272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALEXANDER A. MERCADO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 /ALEXANDER A MERCADO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742671
Improved Metering Systems & Methods
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742692
SPUTTERING THIN FILM SIX-DIMENSIONAL FORCE SENSOR ELASTOMER STRUCTURE BASED ON IMPROVED CROSS BEAM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741712
SADDLE-RIDE TYPE VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736445
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREPARING A GRINDING PATTERN FOR A METALLURGICAL SAMPLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730028
METHOD AND SYSTEM WITH MULTI-CONDUCTOR SENSORS FOR MOISTURE MONITORING OF STRUCTURES
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 614 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month