Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/706,849

EXOSKELETON

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 02, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2021 — EU 21206969.4 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, CAMTU TRAN
Art Unit
3786
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
541 granted / 858 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
882
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
72.4%
+32.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 858 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This Office Action is responding to applicant’s amendment filed on 5/2/2026. Claims 1-15 have been cancelled. Claims 16-29 are newly added. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 25 & 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 25 recites the limitation "said tilt plane" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant might have intended for claim 25 to depend from claim 18 instead? Applicant is invited to verify such potential dependency. Claim 28 recites the limitation "the different parts" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-17 and 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Asbeck (U.S. Patent No. 10,870,198). Regarding independent claim 16, Figures 1-5 discloses applicant’s claimed exoskeleton (100, 200) comprising: a rigid main body (140, column 2 lines 49-50), and a hip engagement member (502) for engagement of the rigid main body (140) with a hip of a person when wearing the supporting exoskeleton (100, 200), a first lower member (560) rotatably attached to the main body (140, 502) such that an axis of the rotation (pivot 241) of the first lower member (560) substantially coincides with an axis of a rotation of a left hip joint of said person, and comprising a left leg engagement member (504) for engagement with a left leg of said person, and a second lower member (561) rotatably attached to the main body (140) such that an axis of the rotation of the second lower member (561) substantially coincides with an axis of a rotation of a right hip joint of said person, and comprising a right leg engagement member (503) for engagement with a right leg of said person, a differential coupler (differential mechanism described in column 3 lines 40-65), adapted for, in an engagement mode of the differential coupler, differentially coupling the rotation of the first lower member (560) to the rotation of the second lower member (561), wherein the vertical elastic element (110, 111) of the supporting exoskeleton (100, 200) is coupled to an upper torso engagement member (12) for engagement with an upper part of a torso of said person, and fixedly coupled to the main body (140), wherein the differential coupler (differential coupler, column 3 lines 40-65) comprises a flexible shaft (vertical carbon fiber leaf springs and rigid element, column 3 lines 40-47), connected to first gears located at a left hip of the person and to second gears located at a right hip of the person (column 3 lines 40-47 describe pivots on either side of legs), wherein the first gears and the second gears are configured for generating a differential coupling between the first lower member (560) and the second lower member (561). Regarding independent claim 17, the Asbeck reference, presented above, discloses applicant’s claimed supporting exoskeleton according to claim 16, wherein the differential coupler (column 3 lines lines 44-54 describes the differential mechanism allows the movement between locked/stationary mode and walking/motion mode) is switchable to a disengagement mode, comprising disengaging the movement of the first lower member (560) and the movement of the second lower member (561). Regarding independent claim 28, the Asbeck reference, presented above, discloses applicant’s claimed method for making the supporting exoskeleton according to claim 16, comprising obtaining the different parts, and assembling said parts so as to form the supporting exoskeleton (see assembled exoskeleton in Figures 1-5). Regarding independent claim 29, the Asbeck reference, presented above, discloses applicant’s claimed us of the supporting exoskeleton according to claim 16 for lifting an object (see Figures 1-5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-24 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 25 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMTU TRAN NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4799. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rachael E Bredefeld can be reached at 571-270-5237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMTU T NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672974
HINGE ASSEMBLY FOR AN ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661270
EARBUD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653711
ADAPTIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL ORTHOSES AND METHODS FOR THEIR MANUFACTURE AND USE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653745
Method and Apparatus for Securing a Patient's Limb
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648824
CATHETER ORGANIZER FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.9%)
3y 7m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 858 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month