Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 01, 2026
Application No. 18/707,529

TONE MAPPING WITH CONFIGURABLE HDR AND SDR DIFFUSE WHITE LEVELS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2021 — EU 21306562.6 +1 more
Examiner
BLACKSTEN, SYDNEY LYNN
Art Unit
2674
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-62.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
17
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§103
81.7%
+41.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/03/2024 is being considered by the examiner. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. EP 213065.6, filed on 11/08/2021. Status of Claims Claims 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 16-17 are pending. Amendments Applicant submitted amendments on 05/03/2024. The Examiner acknowledges the amendment and has reviewed the claims accordingly. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because Claim 16 recites a “computer program comprising program code instructions for implementing the method according to claim 1.” Where the computer program comprising program code instructions can be interpreted as software per se. Therefore, the elements recited in Claim 16 are non-statutory. Similarly, computer programs claimed as computer listings per se, i.e., the descriptions or expressions of the programs are not physical “things.” They are neither computer components nor statutory processes, as they are not “acts” being performed. Such claimed computer programs do not define any structural or functional interrelationships between the computer program and other claimed elements of a computer which permit the computer program’s functionality to be realized. In contrast, a claimed non-statutory computer-readable medium encoded with computer program is a computer element which defines structural and functional relationships between the computer program and the rest of the computer which permit the computer program’s functionality to be realized, and is thus statutory. Accordingly, it is important to distinguish claims that define descriptive material per se from claims that define statutory inventions. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 17 are allowed. The following is an Examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1-5, 7-12, 14, and 17 are allowed since the closest prior arts are van der Vleuten et al. (European Patent Publication No. EP 3621307 A1, hereafter referred to as van der Vleuten) and International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) (NPL, Report ITU-R BT.2446-1 “Methods for conversion of high dynamic range content to standard dynamic range content and vice-versa,” March 2021, hereafter referred to as ITU-R). However, when looking at all the available prior arts, none teach wherein computing the first tone mapping curve comprises: obtaining an intermediate tone mapping curve from the high dynamic range data, wherein non-linear luminance values of the high dynamic range data smaller than a high dynamic range diffuse white are mapped into non-linear luminance values of the standard dynamic range data; rescaling abscissas of the intermediate tone mapping curve from a range of luminance values of the high dynamic range data between zero and the high dynamic range diffuse white to a range of luminance values of the high dynamic range data between zero and a maximum luminance value of the high dynamic range data: and,mapping ordinates of the intermediate tone mapping curve in a range of luminance values of the standard dynamic range data between zero and a value depending on a standard dynamic range diffuse white to obtain the first tone mapping curve: wherein the first tone mapping curve ends by a first point with an abscissa representative of the high dynamic range diffuse white and an ordinate representative of the standard dynamic range diffuse white, and completing the combined tone mapping curve with a second tone mapping curve for high standard dynamic range starting from the first point. The closest prior art, van der Vleuten teaches methods and apparatuses for coding high dynamic range images which can be compressed by applying functions to be co-communicated with the second dynamic range as metadata. van der Vleuten teaches mapping a high dynamic range (HDR) image to a lower dynamic range (SDR) image. The closest prior art, ITU-R, teaches methods for conversion of high dynamic range content to standard dynamic range content and vice-versa. ITU-R teaches mapping the “HDR Reference White” level to approximately 90% of the SDR signal to ensure similar brightness between tone-mapped HDR and native SDR content. ITU-R teaches applying a 1:1 tone mapping between HDR and SDR display light over most of the signal range and applying a compression function to the higher luminance level signals. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYDNEY L BLACKSTEN whose telephone number is (571)272-7651. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oneal Mistry can be reached at 313-446-4912. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SYDNEY L BLACKSTEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2674 /ONEAL R MISTRY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month