Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/707,636

DATA CARRIERS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 06, 2024
Examiner
GRABOWSKI, KYLE ROBERT
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Thales Dis France SAS
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
647 granted / 1341 resolved
-3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1341 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION `This is a Non-Final Action in response to the RCE and claims filed 10/09/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ishida (WO/2021/182302) referenced via (US 2023/0144301). In respect to claims 1, 3, and 6-7, Ishida disclose a data carrier comprising: a carrier body 13; a printing layer 12 (colored matter formed of ink) (0248), and a marking layer 11, the printing layer 12 arranged on the top surface of the carrier body 13, and the printing layer 12 arranged above the marking layer 11 (Fig. 1); the marking layer 11 is configured to be impinged with electromagnetic radiation (laser) such that a marking element is generated (wherein a “security element” comprises at least a part of the printing layer and at least a part of the marking layer); both the marking layer 11 and the printing layer 12 may contain reactive elements such that reaction with the electromagnetic radiation (laser) occurs (0087-0088; 0097) forming the security element (Fig. 2). In respect to the amended subject matter, Ishida discloses that the security element is a combined alignment of the printing layer and the marking layer (which both may be irradiation generated) (0125-0130; Fig. 2). In respect to claim 2, Ishida discloses that the marking element may be formed as an opaque color reaction (0088). In respect to claim 4, Ishida discloses that the reacted element (printing layer) and the marking element (marking layer) are aligned with respect to one another in an alignment arrangement (Fig. 2). In respect to claim 5, Ishida discloses that the reactive element (printing layer) may be configured to modify propagation of the laser, and the reacted element may be a color-changed element (0104). In respect to claim 8, Ishida discloses that a grid (“viewing filter”) is formed by the reacted elements (printing layer) (Fig. 2). In respect to claims 9-10, Ishida discloses that the printing layer and marking layer may be configured such that the marking element and the reacted element are formed simultaneously with the same electromagnetic radiation (laser) (Fig. 4B). In respect to claim 11, Ishida discloses that the marking layer and printing layer are arranged at a distance from one another (Fig. 2), In respect to claim 12-15, Ishida discloses the claimed invention for the reasons stated above. Furthermore, intrinsically the marking element or printing layer must be provided before the other. In respect to claims 16 and 17, Ishida discloses that the data carrier may comprise e.g. a credit card (0199; Fig. 17a-17b). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/09/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant contends that Ishida does not disclose the added limitation to the independent claims. This is not persuasive. Ishida discloses that the “security element” is directly formed for a combined alignment of the printing layer and the marking layer. This is clearly seen in Fig. 2 and described in (0125-0130). The applicant argues vague alleged intentions of Ishida (which are not conceded by the Examiner) and fails to provide any distinction between the structure, or the structural function of Ishida and the present application. Ishida discloses the same “security element”: the printing layer is marked in alignment with the marking layer, thus producing a shifting image tilt effect, a ”security element” (Fig. 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE ROBERT GRABOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3518. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy, can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYLE R GRABOWSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jun 30, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Oct 09, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603020
DISPLAY STAND WITH CARDBOARD BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600160
PERSONALIZABLE SECURITY DOCUMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594488
Challenge Cribbage Game Device and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593820
Livestock Management System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582898
HANDSFREE DICE ROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month