Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/707,714

POUCH

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 06, 2024
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Oak International Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
746 granted / 1017 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1048
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§102
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is misdescriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a pouch” which is unclear how the structure recited defines a pouch. There is no recited structural relationship that cooperate with each other to form “a pouch.” Claim 1 recites “5” as a part of formula disclosed in lines 8-10, which renders the claim unclear and indefinite on what 5 is representing in the formula. Claim 1 recites “an engaging section,” which renders the claim unclear and indefinite the structure “the engaging section” is derived from in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by May (U.S. 2002/0064320). As for Claim 1, May discloses a pouch, comprising: with a slide fastener (114); and a slider (150) for opening and closing the slide fastener (see para [0027]), wherein the slide fastener has a recessed strip (130) on one side, and has a raised strip (131) opposing to the recessed strip on the other side (see Fig. 2), wherein the slider performs an engagement/disengagement between the recessed strip and the raised strip (see para [0027]), wherein the slider has a portion satisfying [5 < (a maximum width in at least a portion of the slider)/(an outer width at an engaging section when the recessed strip and the raised strip are in an engaging state )] (see para [0038-0040]), wherein a maximum width in the slider is 1.4 cm to 3 cm (see para [0038-0040]), and wherein a maximum length in the slider is 2 cm to 5 cm (see para [0038-0040]). Claim 2. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to claim 1, wherein the slide fastener is made of resin (see para [00028]), Claim 3. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to of claim 1, wherein, in the slider, a neighboring section (173/175) of a portion having the maximum width includes bumps (173/175 see Figs. 3-4). Claim 4. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to claim 1, wherein, in the slider, a neighboring section (173/175) of a portion having the maximum width is formed of a soft material or an elastic material (see para [00028]). Claim 5. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to of claim 1, wherein, in the slider, a neighboring section (173/175) of a portion having the maximum width is formed to be detachable from the slider (see Figs.3-4). Claim 6. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to claim 1, wherein, in the slider, a neighboring section (173/175) of a portion having the maximum width is fixed to the slider (see Figs. 3-4). Claim 7. (Currently Amended) The pouch according to claim 1, wherein, in the slider, a neighboring section (173/175) of a portion having the maximum width is provided with a unique character (173/175, see Figs. 3-4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Saad et al. (U.S. 2004/0234173) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 06, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599200
MAGNETIC BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595815
COUPLING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594873
Cable Binder for Vehicles, Cable-Binding Assembly, and Vehicle Lamp with the Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582203
Snap-Thru Grid Fastener For Mesh Fabrics
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577973
COLLAPSIBLE SPACER FOR SETTING GAP BETWEEN ADJACENT PANELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month