Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/708,253

REFRIGERATOR OIL COMPOSITION AND MIXED COMPOSITION FOR REFRIGERATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 08, 2024
Examiner
VASISTH, VISHAL V
Art Unit
1771
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
966 granted / 1337 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1388
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1337 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicants’ submission filed on 12/8/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicants’ response filed 12/8/2025 amended claims 1 and 6, cancelled claim 4, and added new claims 11-15. Applicants’ amendments overcome the 35 USC 103 rejection over Kawahara from the office action mailed 9/8/2025; therefore, this rejection is withdrawn. New grounds of rejection necessitated by applicants’ amendments are set forth below. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 10/1/2025 and 11/25/2025 were filed after the mailing date of the final office action on 9/8/2025. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-3 and 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bujouves et al., US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0318023 (hereinafter referred to as Bujouves). Regarding claims 1-3 and 10-13, Bujouves discloses a refrigerating oil composition (as recited in claim 1) (see Abstract) comprising a hydrocarbon refrigerant, such as, pentane (hydrocarbon-based refrigerant as recited in claim 1 and reads on claim 11) (Para. [0011]) which is added up to 100 wt% of the refrigerating oil composition of an aromatic ester compound formed by reacting trimellitic or pyromellitic acids with monohydric alcohols having a linear or branched chain of 4 to 15 hydrocarbyl groups (as recited in claim 1/formula 1 and reads on claims 2-3 and 12-13) (Col. 14/L. 16-20 and Col. 15/L. 20-54) wherein the composition does not require a phosphors-based extreme pressure agent (as recited in claim 1) (see Examples), nor another base oil (as recited in claim 10) (see Abstract as the polyol ester base oil is an optional component) (Para. [0012]). Kawahara differs from claim 1 in that Kawahara does not include a specific embodiment comprising a hydrocarbon refrigerant and a trilmellitic-derived ester base oil as recited in claim 1. It is the position of the examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would immediately envisage the limitations of claim 1 based on the disclosure of Kawahara as discussed above. Regarding claims 6-9, see discussion above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bujouves in view of Osumi et al., US Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0123436 (hereinafter referred to as Osumi). Regarding claims 14-15, Bujouves discloses all the limitations discussed above but does not disclose the R1 groups being oleyl groups as recited in claims 14-15. Osumi discloses machine oil compositions (see Title) comprising aromatic ester base oils including those formed by reacting trimellitic and pyromellitic acid with alcohols having 1 to 18 carbon atoms (as recited in claims 14-15) (Para. [0011]) which can be used with a hydrocarbon refrigerant (Para. [0078]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the R groups of Osumi in the ester of Bujouves as it is a simple substitution of one known element for another in order to obtain predictable results. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments filed 12/8/2025 regarding claims 1-3 and 6-15 have been fully considered and are moot as the rejection from the previous office action has been withdrawn as discussed above. It is the position of the examiner that the prior art discussed above adequately reads on the claims as instantly recited. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL V VASISTH whose telephone number is (571)270-3716. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-4:30 and 7:00-10:00p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Prem Singh can be reached at 5712726381. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VISHAL V VASISTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 21, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600916
OPEN GEAR LUBRICANT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595433
ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590267
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING BIODIESEL AND PRODUCTS OBTAINED THEREFROM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584076
ENHANCED LUBRICANT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583024
METHOD FOR DISPOSAL OF PHOTOCURED WASTE BY PHOTOOXIDATION-CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS COUPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.3%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1337 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month