Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/708,386

Body-in-White with a Drive Battery

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 09, 2021 — DE 10 2021 005 515.2 +1 more
Examiner
SCHUSTER, ALMA DONGFENG
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
6 granted / 6 resolved
+48.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
10
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 6 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng et al. (CN 104443039 A) in further view of Kim et al. (KR 20230119445 A). Regarding claim 7, Cheng et al. teaches a body-in-white of a passenger car (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2), comprising: a frame structure (Cheng, “electric car frame structure”, Abstract, annotated in Fig. 2) which is peripherally closed and which delimits a receiving space (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) for receiving a drive battery having battery modules (Cheng, 5, Fig. 1); wherein the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) is formed by first cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) which are spaced apart from one another in a longitudinal direction of the passenger car (Cheng, Para. [0006-0008]) and by first side members (Cheng, 4, as shown in Fig. 2) which are spaced apart from one another in a transverse direction (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) of the passenger car (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2); second side members (Cheng, 1/2, as shown in Fig. 2) adjoining the frame structure (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) in the longitudinal direction (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) of the passenger car (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2); and third side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) and second cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) disposed in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2); wherein the third side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) connect (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) the first cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) to one another and wherein the second cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) connect (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) the first side members (Cheng, 4, Fig. 2) to one another; wherein the second side members (Cheng, 1/2. Fig. 2) adjoining (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2), as viewed in the longitudinal direction (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2), each have, in a connection region (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) to a respective first cross member (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) of the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2), a load path (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 13b) free of offset in the transverse direction (Cheng, Para. [0056]) is formed between the second side member (Cheng, 1/2, as shown in Figs. 2 and 13b) and the third side member (Cheng, as shown in Figs. 2 and 13b) disposed directly behind it in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Figs. 2 and 13b); wherein the third side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) and respective second side members (Cheng, 1/2, Fig. 2) of a front-end structure (Cheng, 1, annotated in Fig. 2, Para. [0047]) and/or second side members (Cheng, 1/2, Fig. 2) of a rear-end structure (Cheng, 2, annotated in Fig. 2, Para. [0047]), which are virtually connected in extension, are each directly connected to one another by a respective connecting element (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) bridging the respective first cross member (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) above. PNG media_image1.png 544 951 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 413 517 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 391 567 media_image3.png Greyscale However, Cheng et al. fails to teach at least a partial overlap with the corresponding third side member disposed within the receiving space such that, in an event of a collision-induced application of force in at least one of the second side members. However, Kim et al. teaches at least a partial overlap (Kim, as shown in Figs. 1 and 10) with the corresponding third side member disposed within the receiving space such that, in an event of a collision-induced application of force in at least one of the second side members. PNG media_image4.png 566 506 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 699 524 media_image5.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to construct the corresponding third side member as taught by Cheng et al. to incorporate a partial overlap as taught by Kim et al. with a reasonable expectation of success for the advantage to increase rigidity and alignment of the front and rear side members along the inner side frames. Regarding claim 8, Cheng et al. teaches the third side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) are disposed adjacent to second side members (Cheng, 1/2, Fig. 2) at least in a front region (Cheng, 1, as shown in Fig. 2) of the body-in-white and/or adjacent to second side members (Cheng, 1/2, Fig. 2) in a rear region (Cheng, 2, as shown in Fig. 2) of the body-in-white. Regarding claim 9, Cheng et al. teaches the third side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) are disposed in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) between the first cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) of the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2). Regarding claim 10, Cheng et al. teaches the second cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) are disposed in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) between the first side members (Cheng, 4, Fig. 2) of the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2). Regarding claim 11, Cheng et al. teaches one of the second cross members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) in the receiving space (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) consists of a plurality of partial elements (Cheng, annotated above in Fig. 2) wherein a total length of the plurality of partial elements (Cheng, as shown above in annotated Fig. 2) is smaller than a distance (Cheng, as shown in Fig. 2) between front (Cheng, 1, Fig. 2) and rear cross members (Cheng, 2, Fig. 2) or outer side members (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2) of the frame structure (Cheng, annotated in Fig. 2). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Patberg et al. (US 20140117716 A1) teaches a similar frame structure of a vehicle. Kawabe et al. (US 6905165 B2) teaches a floor structure with a plurality of cross members creating a grid pattern. Nakashima et al. (US 7540343 B2) teaches an underbody framework to storage batteries. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alma D Schuster whose telephone number is (571)272-8938. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 8:30am-6:30pm and Fri 7am-11am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy R Weisberg can be reached at (571)270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alma D. Schuster/Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741699
TAILGATE CABLE PRETENSIONER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741521
TAILGATE COVERING WITH MODULAR PADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12715522
UNDERBODY STRUCTURE FOR A VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703428
VEHICLE REAR FASCIA ASSEMBLY
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703441
ROAD VEHICLE WITH VARIABLE GEOMETRY AILERON
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 6 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month