Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/708,647

CONSTRUCTION MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
MCCORMACK, THOMAS S
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hd Hyundai Infracore Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 683 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 683 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 and 10-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1, 2, and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schuetzle (US Pub No. 2010/0038100), Stinar, Sr. (US Pat. No. 10,737,610), and Curtis (US Pub No. 2009/0172983). Regarding claim 1, Schuetzle teaches a construction machine (See Fig. 1 and abstract) comprising: a rear member provided at the rear of an engine room (See [0042] and Fig. 2); Schuetzle does not teach a support plate attached to the other surface of the rear member opposite to one surface facing the engine room; a multifunctional auxiliary brake light coupled to the support plate and extending in a left-right direction to express a selected one of a plurality of lighting or flashing patterns; a cable connected to the multifunctional auxiliary brake light through the through-hole of the rear member; a control device connected to the cable to control the multifunctional auxiliary brake light, and a through hole communicating with the engine room. Stinar teaches a support plate attached to the other surface of the rear member opposite to one surface facing the engine room (See abstract, Fig. 2, and Col. 4 lines 63-65 which teach back plate on the housing for mounting to a surface); a multifunctional auxiliary brake light coupled to the support plate and extending in a left-right direction to express a selected one of a plurality of lighting or flashing patterns (See abstract, Fig. 2, and Col. 4 lines 40-48, which teach a light signal housing with three lights extended lengthwise for signaling turns and braking.); a cable connected to the multifunctional auxiliary brake light (See Fig. 3-5 which shows wiring extending from the back panel of the light housing); and a control device connected to the cable to control the multifunctional auxiliary brake light (See Col. 2, lines 30-32, “The brake and turn signal light system is powered and operated through the VECU.” The VECU is a control unit.). One of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed would have been motivated to modify Schuetzle’s system to include Stinar’s teachings to ensure compliance and safety of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (49CFR571). Therefore, the invention as a whole would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made. Curtis teaches a through hole for a wire between the interior and exterior of the trailer which provides communicating with the room in the trailer (See [0100]). One of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed would have been motivated to modify Schuetzle’s system to include Curtis’s teachings to better ensure function of the system with a weatherproof and moisture proof setup. Therefore, the invention as a whole would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made. Regarding claim 2, Schuetzle does not teach the support plate is formed in a structure that seals the engine room. Curtis teaches to seal the edges (See abstract). It would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use the sealed edges taught in Curtis to keep the engine room protected from outside weather or water. Regarding claim 7, Schuetzle the rear member is an engine room cover (See Fig. 2 which shows the engine within the housing of the trailer. Therefore, the back enclosed trailer is the rear member cover). Regarding claim 8, Schetzle does not teach the support plate is formed to surround the entire multifunctional auxiliary brake light. Stinar teaches that the support plate is formed to surround the entire multifunctional auxiliary brake light (See abstract, Fig. 1-3, component 135 Col. 5, lines 16-24). Regarding claim 9, Schetzle does not teach a multifunctional auxiliary brake light. Stinar teaches a multifunctional auxiliary brake light with a lamp portion and a support plate (See abstract, Fig. 4, and Col. 4, lines 40-48). Stinar does not teach how they are fastened. Curtis teaches fastening with bolts (See [0054]). It would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to utilize bolts to fasten two components together in order to allow secure attachment and allow for easy removal in cases where one of the components needs replacement. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS S MCCORMACK whose telephone number is (571)272-0841. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Zimmerman can be reached at (571) 272-3059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS S MCCORMACK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2686
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602676
IMAGE-BASED USER POSE DETECTION FOR USER ACTION PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598202
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRIORITIZING LIMITED RESOURCES FOR SECURITY MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596189
METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING INFORMATION VIA A MOBILE BEACON
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588672
REPELLENCE SYSTEM AND REPELLENCE METHOD FOR REPELLING ANIMALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584938
MOTION-ACTIVATED SOUND PLAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 683 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month