Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/708,786

Seat Device for a Vehicle

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 09, 2024
Priority
Jan 19, 2022 — DE 10 2022 101 143.7 +1 more
Examiner
ISLAM, SYED A
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
775 granted / 1147 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
86.8%
+46.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1147 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTFR 18/708,786 CTFR 83295 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Objections 07-05-06 Claim 21 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 11. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 07-34-05 AIA Claim 21 recites the limitation " the user " in line 3 . There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter 12-151-07 AIA 07-97 12-51-07 Claim s 11-20 are allowed. 13-03 AIA The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: There are many similarities and dissimilarities between applicant’s invention and the invention of Shu. However, Shu fails to disclose at least one trough element which is hard-shelled at least in sections and to which the padding unit is secured; and at least one spring unit arranged between the padding unit and the trough element, the spring unit having at least one spring element arranged between the padding unit and trough element, wherein the at least one spring element is secured releasably in or to the trough element and by which a spring force acting between the padding unit and trough element is adjustable, a force vector of said spring force running parallel or obliquely to a spring direction extending transversely with respect to the seat surface. No other prior art references in the record whether taken alone or in combination can solve these dissimilarities . Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” 07-39 AIA THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED A ISLAM whose telephone number is (571)272-7768. The examiner can normally be reached 10am-10pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SYED A ISLAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 Application/Control Number: 18/708,786 Page 2 Art Unit: 3636 Application/Control Number: 18/708,786 Page 3 Art Unit: 3636 Application/Control Number: 18/708,786 Page 4 Art Unit: 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 25, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679257
INFANT CAR SEAT ANCHORING ASSEMBLY WITH RETRACTABLE FOOT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673593
HEADREST STRUCTURE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667195
HEADREST
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668158
POWER SEAT FOR AUTOMOBILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662028
SEAT BACK PANEL, SEAT BACK FRAME AND VEHICLE SEAT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+22.6%)
2y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1147 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month