Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/708,851

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY VALIDATING THE RESPONSE COMPLIANCE OF A PENETRANT TESTING LINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 09, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2021 — FR FR2112317 +1 more
Examiner
KO, TONY
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Safran S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
782 granted / 890 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§102
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 890 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “the door” (see claim 4) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a casing surrounding all the elements of the system” among other limitations. It appears, while “a casing” is part of the system and yet the claim reads such that the casing include itself. As such, it is unclear the scope of the claim is unclear renders the claim indefinite. In line 11, claim 1 recites “it”. It is unclear what the claim refers to. Clarification is needed to determine the scope of claim 1. In claim 3, applicant uses “preferential”, and it is unclear what the claim positively recites. That is, it is unclear whether the claimed embodiment employees such dimension. Regarding claim 5, “the main dimensions of each crack” lack antecedent basis. Claim 8 recites “the basis” which lack antecedent basis. Clarification is required. Claims 2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 are rejected because of their dependency upon rejected claims indicated in this section. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patents 10054552 and 5570431 are in related field of invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY KO whose telephone number is (571)272-1926. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY KO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878 TK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704603
LIGHT EMITTING ASSEMBLY, TIME OF FLIGHT CAMERA MODULE, AND MOBILE TERMINAL
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707732
MEMBER FOR SOLID-STATE IMAGE PICKUP DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SOLID-STATE IMAGE PICKUP DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699265
ONCOMING LIGHT REDUCTION USING DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699058
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING WAFERS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693389
LIGHT DETECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING PHOTOSENSOR
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+2.5%)
2y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 890 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month