Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/709,304

CHILD SAFETY SEAT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Examiner
ABRAHAM, TANIA
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 813 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
845
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 11-12, 17-19, and 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gaudreau (US 2012/0146369). Claim 1- Gaudreau discloses a child safety seat (12), comprising: a seat body (20) defining a seating space (shown in fig. 1-0); a seat belt (restraint harness 14) disposed on the front of the seat body (fig. 1) and on the rear of the seat body (fig. 3); and a first barrier (bottom load-limiter bar 62) disposed on the rear of the seat body (fig. 3); wherein the seat belt (14) abuts against the first barrier (62), and the first barrier is configured to receive stress due to impact force applied to the seat belt to prevent the seat body from being deformed (¶ [0005], the disclosure of the bar 62 functioning to dissipate energy by deforming meets the limitation directed to receiving stress and prevent the body 20 from deforming). Claim 2- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 1, wherein the seat body (20) comprises: a seat base (21) and a backrest (22), the seat base and the backrest enclose to define the seating space (fig. 1); the seat belt (14) is disposed on the front of the seat base and the backrest (fig. 1), and on the rear of the seat base and the backrest (fig. 3). Claim 4- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, wherein the first barrier (62) has a hardness greater than that of the seat base (at opposing ends 621, figs. 11-12, ¶ 44). Claim 3- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, wherein the first barrier (62) is disposed on the rear of the seat base (21) to enable the seat belt (14) to be spaced apart from the rear of the seat base (fig. 3). Claim 5- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, wherein the first barrier (62) has a shape of rod, and is at least partially embedded (via bar mount 622M) in the rear of the seat base (figs. 3, 5). Claim 6- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, wherein the seat belt (14) comprises a first connecting section (141, 142) and a second connecting section (162), wherein the first connecting section (141-142) has a first end (shown not designated, fig. 3) and a second end (shown best in figs. 1 & 13), the first end is disposed on the rear of the backrest and the second end is disposed on the front of the backrest; and wherein the second connecting section (162) passes around the seat base (shown best in figs. 1 & 3) and has a third end and a fourth end (shown, not designated), the third end is disposed on the front of the seat base (shown best in fig. 1), and the fourth end is connected to the first end (shown best in fig. 3). Claim 11- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, further comprising a second barrier (61) transversely disposed on the rear of the backrest (fig. 3) and configured to prevent the child safety seat from being deformed (¶ 62-63). Claim 12- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 11, wherein the rear of the backrest is provided with a first mounting rib (31) and a second mounting rib (32) disposed on two opposite sides thereof (figs. 2-3), and two ends (611, 612) of the second barrier (61) are fixed on the first mounting rib and the second mounting rib (¶ 43), respectively. Claim 17- Gaudreau discloses a child safety seat (12), comprising: a seat body (20) including a seat base (21) and a backrest (22) connected to each other to define a seating space (fig. 1); and a second barrier (61) fixed on the backrest (fig. 3) and configured to prevent the backrest from being deformed (¶ 62-63). Claim 18- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, wherein the second barrier (61) is transversely disposed on the rear of the backrest (fig. 3). Claim 19- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 17, wherein the rear of the backrest is provided with a first mounting rib (31) and a second mounting rib (32) disposed on two opposite sides thereof (figs. 2-3), and two ends (611, 612) of the second barrier (61) are fixed on the first mounting rib and the second mounting rib (¶ 43), respectively. Claim 23- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat according to claim 2, wherein the first barrier (62) is disposed on the rear of the backrest (fig. 3). Claim 24- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat according to claim 17, wherein the backrest (22) is provided with perforation holes (shown not designated) on both sides thereof (figs. 1 & 4 show that the body 20 includes lateral backrest bolsters that each have an opening), the perforation holes are configured to allow an on-board safety belt of a vehicle to transversely pass through the front of the backrest to fix the child safety seat to the vehicle (the backrest lateral openings shown are capable of functioning as vehicle seatbelt guides); wherein the second barrier (61) is arranged closer to the perforation holes (fig. 3 shows the bar 61 is closer to the lateral seatbelt openings relative to the backrest distal portion 22T), to prevent the on-board safety belt from causing the backrest to be deformed (¶ 62-63). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaudreau (US 2012/0146369) in view of Gaudreau (US 2012/0153690)- hereinafter Gaudreau-B. Claim 7- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 2, further comprising: a cradle retainer (90) configured to limit and fix the seat belt (14) to the rear of the backrest (fig. 3). Gaudreau does not explicitly teach the seat further comprising a limiting member configured to limit and fix the seat belt to the rear of the backrest; and a fixing rod fixed on the rear of the backrest, and having the limiting member pivotably connected thereto. Gaudreau-B discloses a child safety seat comprising a backrest and a seat belt; and a limiting member (lock actuator 77) configured to limit and fix the seat belt to the rear of the backrest (fig. 3A-B, ¶ 70-71); and a fixing rod (761) fixed on the rear of the backrest, and having the limiting member pivotably connected thereto (¶ 72-73). Gaudreau-B teaches the limiting member and fixing rod function to lock and release the position of the seat belt (14). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the seat of Gaudreau with a limiting member and fixing rod, as taught by Gaudreau-B, in order to effectively lock and release the seat belt position along the backrest. Claim 10- Gaudreau and Gaudreau-B teach the child safety seat (12) according to claim 7, wherein Gaudreau teaches the backrest (22) is provided with a perforation hole (341) (fig. 4), the seat belt (14) passes around the front of the backrest (fig. 1) from the rear of the backrest (fig. 3) through the perforation hole (¶ 47), and the fixing rod (761) taught by Gaudreau-B is arranged opposite to the perforation hole (figs. 3A, 4A). Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaudreau (US 2012/0146369). Claim 14- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 11, wherein the second barrier (61) has a circular tubular structure. Gaudreau does not teach wherein the circular tubular structure has an outer diameter of 12 mm to 13 mm, and the circular tubular structure has a thickness of 1 mm to 1.6 mm. However, the specific dimensions of the second barrier tube are considered a matter of design choice since selecting a suitable diameter and thickness would yield the predictable result of disposing the barrier on the rear of the backrest and would not yield a structure or function that is patentably distinct from what is shown and taught by Gaudreau. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to select the claimed diameter and thickness for the second barrier since selecting suitable dimensions for a circular tubular structure functioning as a barrier involves only routine skill in the art. Claim(s) 15 and 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaudreau (US 2012/0146369) in view of Meeker (US 2007/0228788). Claim 15- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 11, wherein the backrest (22) is provided with lateral openings (shown not designated) on both sides thereof (figs. 1 & 4 show that the body 20 includes lateral backrest bolsters that each have an opening), the guide openings are configured to allow an on-board safety belt of a vehicle to transversely pass through the front of the backrest to fix the child safety seat to the vehicle (the backrest lateral openings shown are capable of functioning as vehicle seatbelt guides). Gaudreau does not teach the seat further comprising a clamping member disposed on the front of the backrest and configured to clamp and fix an on-board safety belt of a vehicle. Meeker discloses a child safety seat comprising: a seat body (12) and a seat belt (42); wherein the seat body backrest (18) is provided with lateral openings on both sides thereof (defining belt path 184), the lateral openings are configured to allow an on-board safety belt (156) of a vehicle to transversely pass through the front of the backrest to fix the child safety seat to the vehicle; and wherein a clamping member (186) disposed on the front of the backrest (fig. 1) and configured to clamp and fix an on-board safety belt (156) of a vehicle (figs. 14A-C). Meeker teaches providing the clamping member for preventing or minimizing side-to-side sliding of the child seat (¶ [0008]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the child seat of Gaudreau with a clamping member, as taught by Meeker, in order to further secure the child seat to the vehicle seat. Claim 22- Gaudreau discloses the child safety seat (12) according to claim 11, wherein the backrest (22) is provided with lateral openings (shown not designated) on both sides thereof (figs. 1 & 4 show that the body 20 includes lateral backrest bolsters that each have an opening), the guide openings are configured to allow an on-board safety belt of a vehicle to transversely pass through the front of the backrest to fix the child safety seat to the vehicle (the backrest lateral openings shown are capable of functioning as vehicle seatbelt guides). Gaudreau does not teach the child seat further comprising a clamping member disposed on a side of the backrest facing the seating space and configured to clamp and fix an on-board safety belt of a vehicle. Meeker discloses a child safety seat comprising: a seat body (12) and a seat belt (42); wherein the seat body backrest (18) is provided with lateral openings on both sides thereof (defining belt path 184), the lateral openings are configured to allow an on-board safety belt (156) of a vehicle to transversely pass through the front of the backrest to fix the child safety seat to the vehicle; and wherein a clamping member (186) disposed on a side of the backrest facing the seating space (fig. 1) and configured to clamp and fix an on-board safety belt (156) of a vehicle (figs. 14A-C). Meeker teaches providing the clamping member for preventing or minimizing side-to-side sliding of the child seat (¶ [0008]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the child seat of Gaudreau with a clamping member, as taught by Meeker, in order to further secure the child seat to the vehicle seat. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA ABRAHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-2635. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID DUNN can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.A./Examiner, Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600280
SEAT SUPPORT ELEMENT COMPRISING AN ADJUSTABLE REST ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599249
ANTI-ROLLOVER STRUCTURE, CARRYING DEVICE AND BABY CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594864
DRAW-IN BAR FOR HOLDING A COVER, COVER FASTENING SYSTEM AND VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594865
ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576757
VEHICLE SEAT, FOR AT LEAST TWO USERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month