Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/709,399

CONVEYING DEVICE FOR A PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
Nov 11, 2021 — DE 10 2021 129 322.7 +1 more
Examiner
ARANT, HARRY E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Khd Humboldt Wedag GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
283 granted / 579 resolved
-11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
88.6%
+48.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7-9 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by German Patent Publication DE169590C. Regarding claim 7, DE169590C discloses a device for conveying bulk material for a plant producing cement clinker (figs 1-3), wherein the plant for the production of cement clinker operates in a recirculation process the device comprising: a connection with the plant (via D4, ¶0008), in which a bulk material to be transported passes into the plant, wherein the connection comprises a gas supply for pressurizing the connection with a recirculation gas (via C5, ¶0010). Regarding claim 8, DE169590C further discloses wherein the device is a bucket elevator (B3-B7) which has a feeding device (C) at an outlet (fig 1), wherein the feeding device has a tapered cross-section (see annotated fig 1 below) at a transition to the plant compared to a mean cross-sectional area and on which a cone of the bulk material is formed during conveying of the bulk material, which empties into the transition (fig 1). PNG media_image1.png 364 382 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, DE169590C further discloses wherein the gas supply (via C5) is arranged such that the recirculation gas flows into the bulk material cone and expels trapped atmospheric air from the bulk material (fig 1). Regarding claim 12, DE169590C further discloses a gas supply configured to feed a freeboard space of individual buckets with recirculation gas (¶0010). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE169590C as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Keisuke et al. (Japanese Patent Publication JPH0581240U, “Keisuke”). Regarding claim 10, DE169590C discloses all previous claim limitations. However, DE169590C does not explicitly disclose a regulating device which regulates a speed of the bucket elevator as a function of a height of the cone of bulk material, wherein the speed of the bucket elevator decreases as the height of the bulk material cone increases and, conversely, the speed of the bucket elevator increases as the height of the bulk material cone decreases. Keisuke, however, discloses a regulating device which regulates a speed of the bucket elevator as a function of a height of a cone of bulk material (33), wherein the speed of the bucket elevator decreases as the height of the bulk material cone increases and, conversely, the speed of the bucket elevator increases as the height of the bulk material cone decreases (¶0023). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for DE169590C to provide the regulation of the speed of the clinker as taught by Keisuke in order to ensure the optimal amount of cement in the clinker. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DE169590C as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Wang (Chinese Patent Publication CN114192265A). Regarding claim 11, DE169590C discloses all previous claim limitations. However, DE169590C does not explicitly disclose a cross-sectional area of the tapered cross-section is configured to be adjusted from an outside by at least one sliding plate. Hu, however, discloses wherein a cross-sectional area of the tapered cross-section is configured to be adjusted from an outside (61, 62, 64 )by at least one sliding plate (66, page 4, lines 27-41). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for DE169590C to provide the sliding plate of Hu in order to provide optimal feed regulation through the clinker. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY E ARANT whose telephone number is (571)272-1105. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at (571)270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY E ARANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680765
LATENT HEAT STORAGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672260
HEAT DISSIPATION DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663218
SUSPENSION PYLON FOR AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE FITTED WITH A COUNTERFLOW COOLING EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653165
AQUATIC THERMAL REFUGIUM SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHODS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650270
PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL-COATED HEAT EXCHANGE TUBES
5y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+22.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month