Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/709,411

ORAL CAVITY CLEANING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2021 — JP 2021-198432 +1 more
Examiner
RESTAINO, DANIELLE BERNADETTE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
7
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This office action is in response to the filing of the application on 05/10/2024. Since the initial filing, claim 4 has been amended; no claims have been added or canceled. Thus claims 1-4 are pending in the application. Claim Objections Claims 1-3 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 reads “the sectional area” and should be corrected to --a sectional area-- Claim 2 reads “the narrow portion is changed by using an external force.” This limitations should read --the narrow portion is configured to be changed by using an external force-- to avoid any possible interpretation that claim 2 is directed to a method of using a device instead of the device itself. Claim 3 reads “sectional areas” and should be corrected to --a sectional area” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chang et al. (WO 2016067170 A1). Regarding claim 1, Chang discloses an oral cavity washing device (oral irrigator device 10, FIG 1A) comprising: a device body (handle portion 12, FIG 1A) comprising a pump (delivery mechanism 20, FIG 1B) that discharges a washing liquid ([0049] “The oral irrigator device 10 in operation produces successive bursts of a liquid/air mixture”); and a nozzle (nozzle 16, FIG 1A) that is provided in the device body (Fig 1B shows the nozzle 16 extending down wards into the handle 12) and discharges the washing liquid discharged by the pump to an outside (FIG 1B shows the pump system and the liquid reservoir and FIG 9-11 show the liquid being displaced via the pump to an outside), wherein the nozzle comprises a narrow portion (see FIG 7A and 8A) in such a manner that the sectional area (see FIG 7A and 8A) thereof is set to be smaller than that of another portion of the nozzle (As seen in FIG 7A and 8A, the inner portion of the tip of the nozzle is tapered and a section of the top part of the narrow portion is smaller than a section of the bottom portion of the narrow portion), and that the sectional area thereof is variable (The variable portion that is set within the narrow portion of the nozzle allows the sectional area to become smaller or bigger depending on the location of the variable portion, the sectional area is then therefore variable. The “sectional area” is considered the amount of open space found within a given cross section of the nozzle (i.e. diameter of the interior channel of the nozzle minus the space taken up by the variable portion)). PNG media_image1.png 389 436 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Chang discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the sectional area of the narrow portion is changed by using an external force. [0060] “a rotation of band 92 (for example, in a clockwise direction), channel 32 is configured to be squeezed, narrowing its diameter. A rotation of band 92 in the opposite direction releases the pressure on channel 32, and the diameter of channel 32 is configured to become comparably larger.” As iterated by Chang in [0060], the device contains a band 92 that when turned by a user exerts a force upon the tip which in turn narrows the diameter (i.e. the narrow portion) to create a more intense flow of the washing liquid for the user. The user can then turn the band in the opposite direction and expand the diameter of the tip which then gives the user a less intense flow of the washing liquid. Regarding claim 4, Chang discloses the device of claim 1, wherein the narrow portion comprises a variable portion (flow regulator component 98, see FIG 7A and 8A) that varies the sectional area from outside the nozzle (The flow regulator component 98 is controlled using a band 92, [0061] FIG 4. The band moves the flow regulator component forward and backwards and increasing/decreasing the diameter of the nozzle within the tip of the nozzle. The band 92 sits upon the outer section of the nozzle; thus, the sectional area within the nozzle tip is variable from outside of the nozzle). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang et al. (WO 2016067170 A1) in view of Choi et al. (KR 20210050698 A). Regarding claim 3, An oral cavity washing device (oral irrigator device 10, FIG 1A) comprising: a device body (handle portion 12, FIG 1A) comprising a pump (delivery mechanism 20, FIG 1B) that discharges a washing liquid ([0049] “The oral irrigator device 10 in operation produces successive bursts of a liquid/air mixture”); and a nozzle (nozzle 16, FIG 1A) that is provided in the device body (Fig 1B shows the nozzle 16 extending down wards into the handle 12) and discharges the washing liquid discharged by the pump to an outside (FIG 1B shows the pump system and the liquid reservoir and FIG 9-11 show the liquid being displaces via the pump to an outside), Chang is silent on wherein the nozzle is divided into two divided nozzles, a selector is disposed between the two divided nozzles, the selector comprises a plurality of communication holes, sectional areas of the plurality of communication holes are different from each other, and the selector is configured in such a manner that one communication hole selected from the plurality of communication holes communicates with the two divided nozzles. However, Choi teaches of a flow control piping system that utilizes a control disk allowing the flow rate of the water to be adjusted by rotating the disk to a different hole with a diameter. Choi shows a nozzle (pipe 10, FIGS 5a-5b) is divided into two divided nozzles (pipes 10 and 10’, FIGS 5a-5b), a selector (central disk 30, FIGS 3-4) is disposed between the two divided nozzles, the selector comprises a plurality of communication holes (orifices 301, 302, 303, and 304, FIGS 3-4), sectional areas (orifice diameter, FIG 4) of the plurality of communication holes are different from each other ([0022] “The multi-flow control disk 30 according to the embodiment of the present invention may have four orifices 301, 302, 303, and 304 having different diameters”, FIGS 3-4), and the selector is configured in such a manner that one communication hole selected from the plurality of communication holes communicates with the two divided nozzles (Taught in [0027] the control disk is able to be rotated upon its central axis 32 without disconnecting the pipes from each other. The control disk is able to be rotated as to allow the orifices to change; i.e. the user can turn the control disk to switch from orifice 301 to orifice 302/303/304; thus, allowing the flow rate of the liquid to change due to the change of diameter of the orifices, FIGS 7a-7d). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date to modify the device of Chang to include the control disk taught by Choi. Instead of a squeeze device base 30 on the nozzle, the modification would replace the base 30 with the control disk taught by Choi. This combination would allow for the simple and steady transition from different velocities for the mouth washing liquid. As the velocity of the washing liquid is seen as the main contributor of getting rid of plaque and food build up, this combination would allow the user to hold a steady and consistent velocity instead of having to physically squeeze the nozzle. This would also allow the device to be easy to clean and utilize by the user. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Combs (US 20110226865 A1) teaches of an adjustable nozzle upon an oral washing device. The nozzle contains a passageway that can change in diameter as to allow the velocity of the washing fluid to increase or decrease as the user wishes. Balakrishnan (WO 2021032573 A1) teaches of an oral cleaning device with an adjustable mechanism. The inner cavity of the washing device contains a cylinder with multiple different inlet ports of different sizes as to allow the user to adjust the velocity of the fluid in the device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIELLE B RESTAINO whose telephone number is (571)272-8697. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Stanis can be reached at (571) 272-5139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIELLE B RESTAINO/Examiner, Art Unit 3785 /TIMOTHY A STANIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month