Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/709,606

IN-WHEEL MOTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 13, 2024
Examiner
SECK, AHMED F
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Isuzu Motors Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
63 granted / 94 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
130
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 94 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/13/2024 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin (US 20200391547A1) in view of Iino (JP2008109773A). Claim 1 Shin teaches: An in-wheel motor (1) of an outer rotor type including a stator (46) and a rotor (44), the in-wheel motor (1) comprising: a sensor (80) which detects a rotational state of the rotor (see para. 0054); an attachable/detachable member (72) which is attachable to and detachable from the rotor (44) and is provided with the sensor (80) on a surface facing an inner circumferential surface of the stator (46); PNG media_image1.png 496 838 media_image1.png Greyscale Shin does not expressly disclose: a positioning part that defines a positional relationship between the sensor and a magnet of the rotor such that a phase difference between the sensor and the magnet reaches a set value when the attachable/detachable member is attached to the rotor. Iino conversely discloses a structure for phase alignment between a sensor magnet and a rotor magnet (122) and rotor magnet (108). In particular, Iino discloses in paragraphs 0008-0009 providing a notch (106a) on an output shaft as a reference mark, and providing protrusion (121a) on a support member that engages with the notch. Iino also discloses in these paragraphs magnetizing the sensor magnet and rotor magnet with reference to engagement structures, and ensuring that, when assembled, the polarities of the sensor magnet and rotor magnet coincide. Thus, Iino teaches a mechanical engagement structure (notch and protrusion) that defines a positional relationship between the sensor magnet and the rotor magnet so that a predetermined phase relationship is achieved upon assembly. The engagement structure constitutes a positioning part that defines the relative phase between the sensor and rotor magnet during attachment. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to modify Shin’s attachable/detachable member to include the positioning structure taught by Iino. More specifically, a it would have been obvious to a PHOSITA during the time of the claimed invention to modify an in-wheel motor structure to comprise a positioning part that defines a positional relationship between the sensor and a magnet of the rotor such that a phase difference between the sensor and the magnet reaches a set value when the attachable/detachable member is attached to the rotor. It would be advantageous for Shin’s system to comprise of a positioning structure similar to that of Iino’s as precise phase alignment between the rotor magnet and sensor is inherently critical to correctly position the sensor in order to accurately detect rotor rotational stats. Furthermore, Iino recognizes that dimensional and assembly errors can cause phase differences and teaches a mechanical engagement structure to define the phase relationship upon assembly (para. 0008-0009). Claim 2/1 Shin as modified by Iino teaches: The in-wheel motor (1) according to claim 1, wherein: the positioning part includes: a fitted part (notch 106a; Iino) provided in each of the rotor (44) and the attachable/detachable member (72); and a fitting member (protrusion 121; Iino) which is attachable to and detachable from the rotor (44) and the attachable/detachable member (72) and is fitted into the fitted part (notch 106a; Iino). Claim 3/1 Shin as modified by Iino teaches: The in-wheel motor (1) according to claim 1, wherein the positioning part includes: a fitted part (notch 106a; Iino) provided in one of the rotor (44) and the attachable/detachable member (72); and a fitting part which is provided on a side of another one of the rotor (44) and the attachable/detachable member (72) and is fitted into the fitted part (notch 106a; Iino), the other one of the rotor (44) and the attachable/detachable member (72) not being the rotor (44) or the attachable/detachable member (72) in which the fitted part (notch 106a; Iino) is formed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED F SECK whose telephone number is (571)272-4638. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED F SECK/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /CHRISTOPHER M KOEHLER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603548
POWER TOOL INCLUDING CONFIGURABLE MOTOR STATOR WINDINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603557
ROTOR WITH DIFFERENT SECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592599
STATOR, ELECTRIC MOTOR, COMPRESSOR AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592596
RELUCTANCE ASSISTED AXIAL FLUX ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587062
Electric Motor Positioning Apparatus Including Rubber pot
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+16.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 94 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month