Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/709,989

MEDICAL SIMULATOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 17, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021042251
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tmsuk Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 765 resolved
-17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
797
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Newly submitted claims 7-11 directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: the claims recite the reaction and the motion that are reproduced by the robot body include a sudden motion and a sudden change in a condition of the patient that are generated irrespective of contents of the simulated medical action performed by the trainee, and a generation order and a generation interval of the reaction and the motion are selected randomly which is not addressed in the original claim set. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 7-11 withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698949
PERSONALIZED COMBAT SIMULATION EQUIPMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12646424
SURGICAL TRAINING MODEL INCLUDING A SIMULATED HUMAN PROSTATE AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640054
COMPUTATIONAL IN SILICO MODEL FOR PLACENTAL BARRIER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640058
SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING THORACIC CAGE AND LUMBAR SPINE REGION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633226
AUTOMATED CUSTOMIZATION VIRTUAL ECOSYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 8m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month