Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/710,032

OUTPUT POWER CONTROL FOR A BEAMFORMING TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
LIU, HARRY K
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
1186 granted / 1303 resolved
+39.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1303 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 9 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because a memory component to store one or more settings for the system processing module does not specify it is a ”non-transitory” type. Applicant needs to amend the claims by adding non-transitory in front of memory/computer readable storage medium in order to overcome the 101 rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 7-12 and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hormis (US-20230336237-A1). Regarding claims 1 and 10, Hormis discloses a method (see Fig. 8) and beamforming transmission system, the system comprising, one or more transmission elements (antenna 515, Fig. 5), the one or more transmission elements each comprising: a power amplifier (PA 535, Fig. 5); an antenna (antenna 515, Fig. 5) coupled to the power amplifier; and a power detector coupled to the antenna (power detector 565)( power detector 565 detects the power of the transmit signal amplified by PA 535, paragraph 0058); a power controller coupled to the power amplifier (Based upon the detected power, a gain controller controls the gain of LNA 510 and also controls the gain of PA 535 by controlling a PA driver 530, paragraph 0058); a system processing module (gain controller 570 and TX beam controller 560 combined) coupled to the one or more transmission elements, the system processing module further coupled to the power controller, the system processing module being arranged to instruct the power controller to control an output power of the power amplifier; wherein the system processing module is arranged to determine a desired beam scanning angle (TX beam controller 560 controls the steering of a TX antenna beam, paragraph 0058) of the one or more transmission elements and to obtain a present output power of the power amplifier from the power detector (gain controller 570 receives from power detector 565); and further wherein the system processing module is arranged to instruct the power controller to control the output power of the power amplifier based on both the desired beam scanning angle (TX beam controller 560) and the present output power of the power amplifier (gain controller 570). Regarding claims 2-3 and 11-12, Hormis discloses beamforming transmission system as claimed in claim 1/10, further comprising the system processing module being arranged to instruct the power controller to control the output power of the power amplifier based on one of at least a first operating point of the power amplifier and a second operating point of the power amplifier (signal relay chain includes a feedback path including the power detector 565 coupled to a gain controller 570. The power detector 565 receives a signal from the PA 535, and the signal may include the output of the PA 535. Based on the detected output, the gain controller 570 may adjust a gain of the PA driver 530 to the PA 535 and/or the LNA 510 to increase or maintain stability of signal transmission within the signal relay chain, paragraph 0061)(a feedback chain implies two operating points used to control and keep the power in control)( Some UEs 115 may be configured to employ operating modes, paragraph 0034)(such operating modes determines power consumption). Regarding claims 7-8 and 16-17, Hormis discloses wherein the power controller comprises a power mode controller coupled to the power amplifier and a bias current generator coupled to the power amplifier, both the power mode controller and the bias current generator being coupled to the system processing module; and wherein the system processing module is arranged to switch on or off the power amplifier based on operating points, the switch on or off being independent of at least one other power amplifier of the one or more transmission elements (refer to rejection of claims 2and 11, paragraph 0034, operating mode of half-deplex or full duplex or power conservation). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Hormis discloses beamforming transmission system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a memory component to store one or more settings for the system processing module to instruct the power controller to control the output power of the power amplifier based on both the desired beam scanning angle and the present output power of the power amplifier (see memory 250/code 255 in Fig. 2, paragraph 0048)(memory/memory 340 in Fig. 3, paragraph 0052). Regarding claim 18, Hormis discloses method as claimed in claim 10 further comprising storing one or more settings in a memory component of the beamforming transmission system, the one or more settings for instructing the power controller to control the output power of the power amplifier based on both the desired beam scanning angle and the present output power of the power amplifier (processor/memory 340, which may be used to control one or more of the beam controller 310 and the signal relay chain 315, Repeater 305 includes a signal relay chain 315 that amplifies a received signal from the RX antenna before it is re-transmitted by the TX antenna for better reception or retransmission of the signal, paragraph 0052)(signal relay chain and memory combined to control direction and power of transmission). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY K LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-1338. The examiner can normally be reached on every M-F 10 AM to 6:30 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please leave a voice message with application serial number and nature of call, a response within 24 hours can be expected during regular business days. Also, the Examiner’s supervisor Hodge, Robert W. can be reached at (571) 272-6496. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-270-2338. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY K LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645 Tel: (571) 270-1338 Fax: (571) 270-2338 Email: harry.liu@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596166
CONFIGURATION OF POSITIONING MODELS UTILIZING MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596170
REAL-TIME LOCATING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596198
METHOD FOR PROVIDING GNSS-RELEVANT ROUTE INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597687
PHASE SHIFTER, ANTENNA, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585024
IONOSPHERIC SCINTILLATION AND TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+5.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1303 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month