Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/710,043

INJECTORS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR DUAL FUEL COMBUSTION

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
GANEY, STEVEN J
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Deyang Hou
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1133 granted / 1378 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1401
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1378 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that use the word “means” or “step” but are nonetheless not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph because the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure, materials, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “means to inject” in claims 32, 33 and 40, since sufficient structure is recited regarding the outward opening and inward opening needle valves. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are not being interpreted to cover only the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant intends to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to remove the structure, materials, or acts that performs the claimed function; or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) does/do not recite sufficient structure, materials, or acts to perform the claimed function. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim limitation “means to inject” in claim 24, line 21, invokes 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. However, the written description fails to disclose the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the entire claimed function and to clearly link the structure, material, or acts to the function. The disclosure is devoid of any structure that performs the function in the claim. The specification only recites on page 10, lines 1 and 2, “wherein, said fuel injector has means to inject different fuels at different thermal physical states independently and collectively” and suggests nothing else to provide structure to support the function. It is suggested that the language “wherein, said fuel injector has means to inject different fuels at different thermal physical states independently and collectively “ is deleted from claim 24 or point out where in the specification the structure to perform the function of “wherein, said fuel injector has means to inject different fuels at different thermal physical states independently and collectively” is disclosed. Therefore, the claim is indefinite and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Applicant may: (a) Amend the claim so that the claim limitation will no longer be interpreted as a limitation under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph; (b) Amend the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites what structure, material, or acts perform the entire claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (c) Amend the written description of the specification such that it clearly links the structure, material, or acts disclosed therein to the function recited in the claim, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If applicant is of the opinion that the written description of the specification already implicitly or inherently discloses the corresponding structure, material, or acts and clearly links them to the function so that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize what structure, material, or acts perform the claimed function, applicant should clarify the record by either: (a) Amending the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function and clearly links or associates the structure, material, or acts to the claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (b) Stating on the record what the corresponding structure, material, or acts, which are implicitly or inherently set forth in the written description of the specification, perform the claimed function. For more information, see 37 CFR 1.75(d) and MPEP §§ 608.01(o) and 2181. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 34 and 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2013/0047964 A1(Kim). As to claim 34, Kim ‘964 discloses a fuel injection method FIGS. 5 and 6 show two different versions of a bottom portion of fuel injector 12. FIG 5 showing a version in which the fuel injector has a concentric gas nozzle outlet set 90a and liquid fuel nozzle outlet set 96a; Figs. 1, 5; par, {0025]), which directly injects both liquid and gas fuel on-demand (A duel fuel system includes a plurality of fuel injectors that have a non-injection configuration, a liquid fuel injection configuration, a gaseous fuel Injection configuration and a combined fuel injection configuration; Figs. 1, 5; Abstract), wherein the injections of two types of fuels can be independently or simultaneously through the same nozzle tip (bottom 71a; the fuel injector has a concentric gas nozzle outlet set 90a and liquid fuel nozzle outlet set 96a; the respective gas n valve member 73 and liquid needle valve member 75 seat at different locations on the same tip component 71 of the injector body 70. Thus both nozzle outlet sets 90 and 96 are defined by a single tip component 71; the fuel injector 12 can be controlled to inject gaseous fuel only, liquid fuel only, both gaseous and liquid fuel simultaneously; Figs. 1, 5; paragraphs [0025], [00351), and liquid fuel i, (via 72/92a; Figs. 4, 5) for controlling gas fuel injection actuations (A liquid control chamber 95 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via a pressure passage 72 and a 2-orifice 151, and a gaseous control chamber 92 is also fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via pressure passage 72 and a 2-orifice 154. High pressure passage 72 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57, and hence liquid fuel common rail 14, via internal passages within fuel injector 12; Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5; paragraph [0026]), enhancing cooling and sealing, and lubricating gas injection needle valves (73a; As best shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, fuel injector 12 includes a hydraulic lock seal 170 inhibit migration of gaseous fuel from gaseous nozzle chamber 91 into liquid nozzle chamber 93 along guide segment 74 of gaseous needle member 73. Hydraulic lock seal 170 includes an annular volume 171 that surrounds guide segment 174 of gaseous needle valve member 7 and a seal passage 172 that fluidly connects the annular volume 171 to liquid nozzle chamber 93, which is always fluidly connected to liquid fuel common rail 14 via liquid supply passage 98. The normally small pressure differential between the liquid fuel and the gaseous fuel inhibits gaseous fuel from migrating along guide segment 74, and also allows a small amount of liquid fuel into the guide clearance along guide segment 74 to maintain lubricity of gaseous needle valve member 73; Fig. 5; paragraph [0031]). As to claim 35, Kim discloses a fuel injection method, where the liquid fuel is diesel, the gas fuel is natural gas, see Fig. 1; paragraph [0032]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 36 and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2013/0047964 A1(Kim). As per claim 36, Kim discloses one type of fuel is diesel, another type of fuel is natural gas see Fig. 1; paragraph [0032]. Kim fails to disclose another type of fuel is hydrogen. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide another type of fuel is hydrogen, since it was within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use. The motivation for doing so would be reducing carbon emissions. See In re Leshin, 277 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). MPEP 2144.07. As per claim 37, Kim discloses one type of fuel is diesel, another type of fuel is natural gas see Fig. 1; paragraph [0032]. Kim fails to disclose one type of fuel is dimethyl ether, another type of fuel is hydrogen. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide one type of fuel is dimethyl ether, another type of fuel is hydrogen, since it was within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use. The motivation for doing so would be reducing NOx and carbon emissions. See In re Leshin, 277 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). MPEP 2144.07. Claim(s) 23, 26, 27 and 39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2017/0175693 A1(Hou et al) in view of US 2013/0047964 A1(Kim). As to claim 23, Hou discloses a fuel injector (A variable orifice fuel injector has an inward opening needle valve and an outward opening needle valve and has means to directly inject two types of fuels independently and collectively; Figs. 1-3; Abstract), comprising: a nozzle body (3; Fig. 3) comprising passages for fuels (a nozzle body (3) comprising passages for fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037], an inner cylindrical bore (307; Fig. 3) for receiving two longitudinally displaceable coaxial needle valves (1, 2; an inner cylindrical bore (307) for receiving two longitudinally displaceable coaxial needle valves (1, 2), one is outward opening needle valve (1) and another is inward opening needle valve (2); Fig. 3; paragraph [0037], at least one group of fuel injection outlets (301, 309; Fig. 3) in said nozzle body (at least one group of fuel injection outlets (301, 309) in the nozzle body; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), at least one spring (5, 5'; Fig. 3) which urges said needle valves into biased seating positions to block fuels (at least one spring (5, 5) which urges the needle valves (1,2) into biased seating positions to block fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), and a valve block (8; Fig. 3) to hold control valves (9, 10; Fig. 3) and having fuel inlets (top 801/803/805; 8-valve block which holds valves and fuel passages, 801-fuel passage to valve 9, 802 pressure passage to venting valve 10, 803-high pressure passage; 804-bottom of valve block 8, 805, 806-fuel passages; paragraph [0023] which can be connected to two pressured fuel reservoirs (12, 13, 15'; and a valve block (8) to hold control valves and having fuel inlets which can be connected to two pressured fuel reservoirs (12, 13); at least two control valves (9, 10) to block or connect at least one type of fuel from high pressure fuel reservoirs (13, 12, 15 ) to low pressure fuel sink (15) to produce the lifting and closing forces o inward opening and outward opening needle valves (1, 2) through generating pressure differences in pressure control chambers (382, 125) Fig. 3; paragraphs [0037], [0041]), pressure control chambers (125, 382; Fig. 3) which can press and release needle valves (1, 2; Fig. 3) through connecting to pressurized and depressurized fuels (pressure control chambers (382, 125) which can press and release needle valves through connecting to pressurized and de-pressurized fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037], and the pressure control chambers for the tw1 needle valves are connected to the same fuel reservoir (12, 15'; Fig. 3) which contains fuel (Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), except to disclose the pressure control chambers for the two needle valves are connected to the same fuel reservoir which contains fuel with higher lubricity among the pressured fuel reservoirs, wherein liquid fuel with higher lubricity is used for controlling actuations and lubricating the needle valve for low lubricity fuel. Kim discloses pressure control chambers (92a, 95a; A liquid control chamber 95 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via a pressure passage 72 and a Z-orifice 151, and a gaseous control chamber 92 is also fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via pressure passage 72 and a Z-orifice 154. High pressure passage 72 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57, and hence liquid fuel common rail 14, via internal passages within fuel injector 12; Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5; paragraph [0026]) for two needle valves (73a, 75a); the respective gas needle valve member 73 and liquid needle valve member 75 seat at different locations on the same tip component the injector body 70. Thus, both nozzle outlet sets 90 and 96 are defined by a single tip component 71; Fig. 5; paragraph [0025] are connected to the same fuel reservoir (14; a gas pressure control device 20 that is operably coupled to control the pressure in gaseous fuel common rail 16, and also in control communication with a liquid pressure control device 22 operably coupled to control the pressure in liquid fuel common rail 14; Fig. 1; paragraph [0015]) which contains fuel (diesel) with higher lubricity (than natural gas among the pressured fuel reservoirs (14, 16); the present disclosure finds particular applicability in gaseous fuel engines that utilize a relatively large charge of natural gas that is ignited via compression ignition of a small charge of distillate diesel fuel originating from common rail 14; Fig. 1; paragraph [0032]), wherein liquid fuel (diesel) with higher lubricity is used for controlling actuations (via 95a; A liquid control chamber 95 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via a pressure passage 72 and a Z-orifice 151, and a gaseous control chamber 92 is a connected to liquid fuel inlet 57 via pressure passage 72 and a Z-orifice 154. High pressure passage 72 is fluidly connected to liquid fuel inl1 hence liquid fuel common rail 14, via internal passages within fuel injector 12; Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5; paragraph [0026]) and lubricating the needle valve for low lubricity fuel (gas needle valve 73a); As best shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, fuel injector 12 includes a hydraulic lock seal 170 to inhibit migration of gaseous fuel from gaseous nozzle chamber 91 into liquid nozzle chamber 93 along guide segment 74 of gaseous needle valve member 73. Hydraulic lock seal 170 includes an annular volume 171 that surrounds guide segment 174 of gaseous needle valve member 7 and a seal passage 172 that fluidly connects the annular volume 171 to liquid nozzle chamber 93, which is always fluidly connected to liquid fuel common rail 14 via liquid supply passage 98. The normally small pressure differential between the liquid fuel and the gaseous fuel inhibits gaseous fuel from migrating along guide segment 74;and also allows a small amount of liquid fuel into the guide clearance along guide segment 74 to maintain lubricity of gaseous needle valve member 73; Fig. 5; paragraph [0031]. I It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hou to provide the pressure control chambers for the two needle valves are connected to the same fuel reservoir which contains fuel with higher lubricity among the pressured fuel reservoirs, wherein liquid fuel with higher lubricity is used for controlling actuations and lubricating the needle valve for low lubricity fuel, as taught by Kim, in order to reduce the wear of the gas needle valve. As to claim 26, Hou discloses a fuel injector comprising all the featured elements of the instant invention, except wherein the fuel injector is u sed for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a major fuel, wherein the control chamber for a large needle valve, which is for blocking gas flow, is connected to a pressured liquid fuel source, and the nozzle body has two rows of orifices with one row of orifices is substantially larger than another lower row of orifices next to a nozzle tip, wherein when the large needle is seated, said larger orifices are substantially covered by said large needle valve. Kim discloses a fuel injector, which is used for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a major fuel (A duel fuel system includes a plurality of fuel injectors that have a non-injection configuration, a liquid fuel injection configuration, a gaseous fuel injection configuration and a combined fuel injection configuration; Figs. 1, 5; Abstract), wherein a control chamber (chamber holding springs adjacent 94a; liquid needle valve member 75 can move upward due to a hydraulic force on opening hydraulic surface 94 positioned in liquid nozzle chamber 93 against the action of its biasing spring to open the fluid connection between liquid nozzle chamber 93 and liquid nozzle outlet set 96 to facilitate a liquid fuel injection event; Fig. 5; paragraph (0027]) for a large needle valve (73a; F which is for blocking gas flow (liquid needle valve member 75a and gaseous needle valve member 73a move along common centerline 19 moving to open and close liquid nozzle outlet set 96a in gaseous nozzle outlet set 90a; Fig. 5; paragraph [0029]), is connected to a pressure liquid fuel source (14; Fig. 1 ), and a nozzle body (71a; Fig. 5) has two rows of orifices (90a, 96a; Fig. 5) with one row of orifices (90a; Fig. 5) is substantially larger than another lower row of orifices (96a; Fig. 5) next to a nozzle tip (bottom 71a; Fig. 5), wherein when the large needle is seated, said larger orifices are substantially covered by said large needle valve (Fig. 5). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hou to provide a fuel injector, which is used for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a major fuel, wherein the control chamber for a large needle valve, which is for blocking gas flow, is connected to a pressured liquid fuel source, and the nozzle body has two rows of orifices with one row of orifices is substantially larger than another lower row of orifices next to a nozzle tip, wherein when the large needle is seated, said larger orifices are substantially covered by said large needle valve, as taught by Kim, in order to burn the fuel more cleanly (see Kim, paragraph [0002]). As to claim 27, Hou discloses a fuel injector comprising all the featured elements of the instant invention, except a fuel injector, which is used for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a minor fuel, wherein the control chamber for a large needle valve, which is for blocking liquid, is connected to a pressured liquid fuel reservoir. Kim discloses a fuel injector, which is used for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a minor fuel (A duel fuel system includes a plurality of fuel injectors that have a non-Injection configuration, a liquid fuel injection configuration, a gaseous fuel injection configuration and a combined fuel injection configuration; Figs. 1, 5; Abstract), wherein a control chamber (chamber holding springs adjacent 94a; liquid needle valve member 75 can move upward due to a hydraulic force on opening hydraulic surface 94 positioned in liquid nozzle chamber 93 against the action of its biasing spring to open the fluid connection between liquid nozzle chamber 93 and liquid nozzle outlet set 96 to facilitate a liquid fuel injection event; Fig. 5; paragraph [0027]) for a large needle valve (73a; Fig. 5), which is for blocking liquid (liquid needle valve member 75a and gaseous needle valve member 73a move along common centerline 19 when moving to open and close liquid nozzle outlet set 96a in gaseous nozzle outlet set 90a; Fig. 5; paragraph [0029] connected to a pressured liquid fuel reservoir (14; Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hou to provide a fuel injector, which is used for gas-liquid dual fuel injections and gas is a minor fuel, wherein the control chamber for a large needle valve, which is for blocking liquid, is connected to a pressured liquid fuel reservoir, as taught by Kim, in order to burn the fuel more cleanly (see Kim, paragraph [0002]). As to claim 39, Hou, as modified by Kim, discloses a fuel injector of claim 23 and further discloses a nozzle body (3; Fig. 3) comprising passages for fuels (a nozzle body (3) comprising passages for fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), an inner cylindrical bore (307; Fig. 3) for receiving two longitudinally displaceable coaxial inward opening needle valves (1, 2; an inner cylindrical bore (307) for receiving two longitudinally displaceable coaxial needle valves (1, 2), one is outward opening needle valve (1) and another is inward opening needle valve (2); Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]) with an inner inward opening needle valve (1; Fig. 3) being held within an outer inward opening needle valve (2; Fig. 3), at least one group of fuel injection outlets (301, 309; Fig. 3) In the nozzle body (at least one group of fuel injection outlets (301, 309) in the nozzle body; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), at least one spring (5, 5'; Fig. 3) which urges the needle valves into biased seating positions to block fuels (at least one spring (5, 5) which urges the needle valves (1,2) into biased seating positions to block fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), and a valve block (8; Fig. 3) to hold control valves (9, 10; Fig: 3) and having fuel inlets (top 801/803/805; 8-valve block which holds valves and fuel passages, 801-fuel passage to valve 9, 802-pressure passage to venting valve 10, 803-high pressure passage; 804--bottom of valve block 8, 805, 806-fuel passages; Fig. 3; paragraph [0023]) which can be connected to two pressured fuel reservoirs (12, 13, 15'; and a valve block (8) to hold control valves and having fuel inlets which can be connected to two pressured fuel reservoirs (12, 13 ); at least two control valves (9, 10) to block or connect at least one type of fuel from high pressure fuel reservoirs (13, 12, 15 ) to low pressure fuel sink (15) to produce the lifting and closing forces on the inward opening and outward opening needle valves (1, 2) through generating pressure differences in pressure control chambers (382, 125); Fig. 3; paragraphs [0037], [0041]), pressure control chambers (125, 382; Fig. 3) which can press and release needle valves (1, 2; Fig. 3) through applying pressurized and de-pressurized fuels (pressure control chambers (382, 125) which can press and release needle valves through connecting to pressurized and de-pressurized fuels; Fig. 3; paragraph [0037]), and (ii) the inner inward opening. needle valve, which has an opening position by moving toward a nozzle body large end (top 3; Fig. 3) to inject fuel from at least one pressurized reservoir (12, 15'; Fig. 3) through one inner fuel injection outlet (301; Fig. 3) and a group of outer fuel injection outlets (309; the inward opening needle valve (2) has a cylindrical space to hold spring (5), the outward opening needle valve (1) and a clip (6), wherein the inward opening needle valve (2) is further comprising fuel passages (122), and a seal cap (7) to define the needle lift, and thrusting surfaces (203, 204) and pressure control chamber (382) to generating lifting force to lift the needle to inject fuel in multiple jets through fuel outlets (301, 309); Fig. 3; paragraph [004, and a biased (5'; Fig. 3) seating position to block fuel flow (Fig. 3), and (iii) the outer inward opening needle valve, which is fully contained in the nozzle body (Fig. 3), has an opening position by moving towards a nozzle body large end (top 3; Fig. 3) to connect at least one pressurized fuel reservoir (13; Fig. 3) and fuel injection outlets (309; Fig. 3) to inject fuel (Fig. 3; paragraph [0044]), has a biased (5'; Fig. 3) seating position with its sealing surface being in contact with a sealing surface (201; Fig. 3) of the nozzle body to block fuel flow, the sealing surface at a seating position is up stream of injection outlets (301, 309; Fig. 3), wherein lifting of the outer inward opening needle valve is independent of a position of the inner inward opening needle valve (A fuel injector according to any of above configurations, wherein it has means to inject one type of fuel through fuel injection outlets (301) by lifting the outward opening needle valve (1) and inject another type of fuel through multiple jet fuel outlets (309) by lifting the inward opening needle valve (2) independently, wherein the injections of two types of fuels can be independently or simultaneously; Fig. 3; paragraph [0046]); (iv) the outer inward opening needle valve has an inner se (bottom 2; Fig. 3) for the inner inward opening needle valve, the inner inward opening needle valve is fully contained in the outer inward opening needle valve (Fig. 3), wherein lifting of the inner inward opening needle valve is independent of a position of the outer inward opening needle valve (Fig. 3; paragraph [0046]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 25, 28-33, 38 and 40 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 24 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sczomak ‘424, Touchette ‘598, Wickstone ‘529 and Graham ‘385 disclose various types of liquid-gas dual fuel injectors. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J GANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4899. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN J. GANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /STEVEN J GANEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599929
POWDER SPRAYING SYSTEM, POWDER SPRAYING NOZZLE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599123
Method for Spreading Spraying Liquid onto Arable Agricultural Land
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594562
VARIABLE FLOW RATE HAND SHOWERS AND SHOWERHEADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588606
AERIAL ELECTROSTATIC SYSTEM FOR WEATHER MODIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582999
TWO-FLUID NOZZLE WITH AN ARCUATE OPENING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1378 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month